| | | |
| Tuesday, October 14, 2008 |
|
Welcome to the New England & Northeast Ski Forums - AlpineZone Forums. You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which only gives you limited access to view most discussions. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (private messages), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator. |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
| Buying Advice Hi all. Glad to be back here now that winter is upon us..... I am long overdue for new skis but have some questions. The choices available are a little overwhelming (as are the prices!). One of the pair my local ski shop recommended was the 06/07 Atomic Izor Premium Skis. How much should I be spending for a decent pair of skis ($$ is a factor)? Is this a good choice of ski? What size is right for me? I have boots that seem OK but they are about 10 years old. Do I need new boots too? FYI - I have been skiing for about 12 years and mostly in PA with the occasional trip to Vermont. I ski on mostly everything, except moguls. I'm 5'8" and weigh 165. Any advice would be welcomed..... |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Marlborough, Massachusetts
Posts: 165
| The Izor skis got pretty good reviews in the past. They're fairly narrow (low-70mm range) underfoot, which basically means that you're not going to be getting much (any) help in deep snow. Then again, since you ski mainly in Pennsylvania -- there isn't much need for float in the deep stuff. Atomic's are known for having incredible edge hold, although just about everything holds adequately well these days if the edges are kept sharp. Atomic's are also known for being S-T-I-F-F. Some people like stiff; some don't. Boots... You don't need new ones; i.e., your old ones will work just fine. If your old ones fit well, then I'd use them for the time being.
__________________ Arc \'em or park \'em |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Mt. Greylock Outing Club Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lexington, Mass.
Posts: 3,036
| Quote:
p.s., I get my butt kicked when I take these into the bumps. They launch me out of the bumps and wear me out. But I can cruise all day. | |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 312
| With regards to you boots, their vintage will not be a problem as long as they've been stored correctly. Boots that are exposed to high temperatures (i.e. hot attic that just boils in summer) can just disintegrate. The plastic shell just doesn't take the heat well. I've seen that happen to a friend, right on the slope. His ski, all of the sudden got away from him. Boot's sole in the binding, the rest of the San Marco still on his leg. It was very funny. It could have been much worse, I guess.
__________________ Live for today |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
| Thanks for the feedback. What about the size? One person mentioned 168s, which was my initial thoughts too. But the salesman suggested 159s, which seems small. Not sure if some of that advice was based on the fact that they only had this ski in that size! I'm 165lbs and consider myself an upper intermediate skier. Would love to progress to a point where I feel more comfortable on the steep black/double blacks. I generally prefer big S turns at moderate speeds. Any thoughts? |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: LI, NY
Posts: 1,462
| I've been skiing the Metons for 5yrs and love em...yes, they are stiff and heavy, but they do not get tossed in crud and death cookies, they blast through everything!! I demo'd all sorts of sizes and ended up falling for the 157cm (i'm 5'10" 180ish) that size and my skiing style just fit,,,,I prefer bumps and shorter fall line turns
__________________ updownupdownupdownupdown |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Multi-tasking as usual Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,430
| I demo'd the izors(more than one model) and found them to be somewhat uninspiring compared to the Volkl Superspeeds, and the Nordica Nitrous. My advice is this............. Get thee to a good boot guy, and get a good boot. Yes 10 years is a bit long in the tooth for your old foot friends. Once you get good boots, demo demo demo. Don't get stuck with a brand, because they all have good properties depending on what you're looking for in a ski. If you want energy and pop, go for a volkl or Elan if you want creamy smooth, go for Nordica or Blizzard If you want damp and stable, then Atomic or Rossi may be the ski for you. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| You're now FAR away from #128 Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: maine
Posts: 1,167
| .... Skinner..my $.01..... Several boots out there will fit nicely!..a lot more shapely shells out there today than 10+yrs ago. Liners...there are some good ones, but you have to find them..., that are worth refilling...imh($.01)o... You name what kind of performance you want in a ski...and it's out there! $.01 Last edited by bigbog; Nov 20, 2007 at 5:20 PM. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Mt. Greylock Outing Club Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lexington, Mass.
Posts: 3,036
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Cold Spring, NY
Posts: 564
| Great fitting boots on bad skis beat poor fitting boots on great skis any day. Boots first, but go to a pro. "The Pro Ski and Ride" at Hunter, "Green Mountain Orthotics" at Stratton, or the resident AZ bootfitter are all real pros. |
| | |
| | ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |