| | | |
| Friday, July 4, 2008 |
|
Welcome to the New England & Northeast Ski Forums - AlpineZone Forums. You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which only gives you limited access to view most discussions. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (private messages), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator. |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Finger Lakes Region
Posts: 762
| Holly crap---a lot of mumble jumble in this thread---here's my .02 simply put..... Buy him something that is in the "all mountain cruiser" catagory. You can't go wrong, I promise. These types of skis are just what the claim to be---good at everything. You can ski bumps, groomers, hard-n-soft snow, trees, steeps etc. As for height, weight vs. length of ski, well, that's all crap. Just look at World Cup skiers. You've have some seriously big/strong dudes rippin it on 160's, why, well because of how stiff the ski is torsionally. That's what will allow someone who's bigger ski a shorter ski. I'm 6'4", 250 lbs and ski 178's (nordica top-fuel) thats 123-78-108 w/r18. I've skied the nordica world cup doberman slalom ski at 155. Very, very, very stable but you needed to be on edge at all times---not the type of skiing I like to do. Anyway, hope that helps. Remeber, just look for all-mountain cruiser/expert catagory and you'll be good.
__________________ YOU WANNA SEE BIG AIR KID, PULL MY FINGER "OLD GUYS RULE" |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,149
| damn that was fun. I don't get a chance to talk physical mechanics all the time. It's mostly electro mechanics and statistical analysis..... Yeah, they got the big boys on short skis, but thats for slalom events. IIRC they will start enforcing a minimum length rule along with sidecut restrictions for that event. For the GS and down hill events they have them longer. |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Finger Lakes Region
Posts: 762
| Quote:
Yes, for GS & DH the skis are much longer because you want them flat and not on edge. Speed baby---it's all about the speed
__________________ YOU WANNA SEE BIG AIR KID, PULL MY FINGER "OLD GUYS RULE" | |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Finger Lakes Region
Posts: 762
| Quote:
__________________ YOU WANNA SEE BIG AIR KID, PULL MY FINGER "OLD GUYS RULE" | |
| | |
| | #46 (permalink) | |
| I'm with psycho --> | Quote:
Anytime you're game I am. It's good to have someone to bounce ideas off of when you're figuring this stuff out.
__________________ Making sanity obsolete since 1982... | |
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) |
| | Back to dork conversation: Marc, how about forward and backwards motion of the skier? (Skiing too far in the backseat or too far forward) If I get way in the backseat my CM is going to be way further back then a skier of the same weight but different height. Thus causing me to have more torque on the ski. Also, when leaning forward, it will make it easier to over-flex the ski. (Though that probably means you would need a stiffer, not longer ski)
__________________ -Austin |
| | |
| | #48 (permalink) | |
| Mad River Glen - 2/8/08 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |