| | | |
| Wednesday, December 3, 2008 |
|
Welcome to the New England & Northeast Ski Forums - AlpineZone Forums. You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which only gives you limited access to view most discussions. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (private messages), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator. |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Poconos, PA
Posts: 167
| Camera Equipment??? Ok, basically I just want to know what everybody uses to take pictures whiles you're up on the slopes. Usually I just use my cell phone, which is 2 MP and takes pretty decent pictures. Which cameras are better weatherproof? Opinions? -Kevin
__________________ Snow, Ice, Wind, Heat, and Humidity; Experience the world. Ski what you can, hike and climb what you can't. Use the rubbers(cycle) for distance. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tricky... Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Rockaway Park, NY
Posts: 4,481
| Casio Elixim. Thin, Small, relatively inexpensive and takes good pictures. The orange case is good in the event you drop it in the snow.
__________________ ~Rich~ |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Ari Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Ashland, NH
Posts: 7,120
| I use a Canon A630 which while bulkier than your standard PNS has tons of awesome features and takes high quality photos. I have never seen good pictures from a cell phone camera. Cell phones have a long long way to go and it really doesn't matter how many MP cell phones offer if the pictures are grainy. MP is important if you want to crop and have good full sized pictures but quality is more important. Standard internet sizing for pics is around 800x600 and you need only slightly larger for desktop background sized. Even with cropping, not major reason for anything about 5 or 6 if you can get super quality. It is kind of like zoom with camcorders. Really good 3ccd camcorders usually start around 10x zoom which is really all you need without a tripod. Entry models are going over 30x which is just ridiculous because it is almost impossible to hold a camcorder steady at that high zoom without a good tripod.
__________________ -Steve TheSnowWay.com "Skiing is not a sport, it is a way of life." - Otto Schniebs 2 |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
| Cameras All my years as an active and competitive skier I knew nothing about cameras. However, within the last ten years I have been taking still photos on and off the slopes. This can be a distraction and not something I do regularly. If you are serious about skiing, leave the camera at home. I have a Canon Sure Shot WP SLR which has worked well for me. You definitely want a waterproof camera if you are going to try working in snowy conditions, but an ordinary single use can take good photos. Polaroids are a real trick since they don't develop well under 55 F. A few years ago I bought another Canon digital camera, the ZR 600 with 25X zoom which also has served me well for stills. So far I have not gone to video on snow. This camera, though, is not waterproof so I've only use it on clear sunny days. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Sundown: 11.30.08 Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Thomaston, CT
Posts: 22,491
| Welcome to the forums. I can't say I agree with this statement though. Why can't someone take pics/vid and still be serious about skiing? I know what you mean by it being a bit of a distraction, but I can usually take some vid or pics of people I'm skiing with without interrupting the flow of the day too much. Also, seeing yourself on video can actually significantly help your skiing as you can see what you need to work on. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
| Let's see. First of all, I've had video taken of me while racing, and I agree it may be helpful. It also can be rather embarrassing when it is shown before a group of people in a movie house while you are there. Second, the cameraman was there to take video and wasn't out for a day of free skiing. I find the cameras I carry heavy and not something I want bouncing around in my clothing. Futhermore, I wear very thin and tight clothing when I can. I have devised a case for my tripod which can be slung over my shoulder, but this only complicates my style. Boarding a lift with this equipment can be dangerous. I don't recommend it for the inexperienced. It's bad enough having poles to carry, but a tripod can ruin your day. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Hunter, NY
Posts: 7,020
| Quote:
Watch where you keep your camera.. If it's in the direct path of your clothing's breathability - it will get damp... Plastic bags are good - but suck if any moisture gets inside... I use a felt bag in an outside( but still water resistant) chest pocket... Or just keep it in a backpack..
__________________ sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooon | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Sundown: 11.30.08 Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Thomaston, CT
Posts: 22,491
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Hunter, NY
Posts: 7,020
| Quote:
Your serious about bumps so you don't need a tight fitting race suit..
__________________ sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooon | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Hunter, NY
Posts: 7,020
| Quote:
__________________ sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooon | |
| | |
| | ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |