| | |
| | | |
| Friday, November 21, 2008 |            |  |
|
Welcome to the New England & Northeast Ski Forums - AlpineZone Forums. You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which only gives you limited access to view most discussions. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (private messages), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator. |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| View Poll Results: Do you love your boots? | |||
| Love em' |     | 24 | 72.73% |
| Hate em' |    | 4 | 12.12% |
| Eh, they're alright. |    | 5 | 15.15% |
| Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Dec 30, 2007, 5:34 PM
| #41 (permalink) | |
  Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: McAfee, NJ
Posts: 2,427
| Quote:
And yep, the claim is that there is a flex between the ball of the foot and the heel. I skied at Catamount today on hard pack and ice. Emphasis on hard pack and ice. I'm sure that the Nomads with their 88mm under-foot are not the ideal ride for these conditions, but they seemed to get up on edge easily enough, and how much of that is the ski and how much is the boot I'm not sure. More likely the combo of the two made for easier edging of the wider ski on the hard surface. I'm anxious to play the boot/ski/binding on some softer conditions soon.
__________________ Happy Trails | |
|  |
|
Dec 30, 2007, 5:34 PM
| |
 AlpineZone Supporter | |
|
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
