Quote:
Originally Posted by bvibert  I fail to see what the cuteness of the kid has to do with anything. If he was ugly would that mean the old guy could sue him all he wants???  |
I was just commenting on the title of the thread. It implies "cute boy -> innocent",
"grumpy old -> evil", jumping to conclusion. I cannot agree with the implication
that 7 years old kid is innocent by default.
This article has more info.
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_7807713
Reader comments of the article is informative too. Interestingly
there is a comment from a guy who claim to have sued by the same
lawyer for the act of his son.