May 6, 2008, 10:17 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
| Sugarbush
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,187
| Quote:
Originally Posted by mondeo Which brings me to my final statement about Apple: if not for the common misperception of Linux as a non-user friendly, text driven operating system, I don't think Apple would sell any computers, whatsoever. Linux is now at the point where a basic user (web browsing, email, general productivity, multimedia,) would probably be more than happy with a Linux system. Any further beyond that, and it begins to be a pain, but that's the point where you start getting compatibility issues in Mac, too. Games, things like TV tuner cards, and other non-standard but still fairly common applications, etc. So in the end, I don't see the benefit of Apple over a Linux system other than a few Apple-developed programs, and Linux is free.
FWIW, I built my new computer last December, and ran until mid-March with Linux only. It does work, even with printer and file sharing with Windows computers on the same network; never tried linking it with my XBox (as a media server,) but from what I know, it does work. | I use Linux exclusively at home. Both Windows and Mac are the dark side. Mac OS might be less buggy, but Mac might be even more into DRM and vendor lock-in than Microsoft. Linux works and is free, both in terms of freedom and cost. I have no interest in someone else controlling my computer.
__________________ -Kenny |
| |