View Single Post
Old May 13, 2008, 11:57 AM   #27 (permalink)
Trekchick
 
Trekchick's Avatar
Multi-tasking as usual
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack97 View Post
It's a hijack about going retro.....

Speaking of which;
F17; 103.8/66.6/89.2 for 175 length or greater, 104/64/92 for 168 length or less

Those dimension are approaching circa early 2000, all mountain and recreational slalom skis
I love the retro chatter. Fascinates me! As for the 168 at 104/64/92. Its pretty skinny for my quiver, but that ski freakin' Rocks!
__________________
Well-behaved women rarely make history ~
~ Laurel Thatcher Ulrich
Trekchick is offline   Reply With Quote