| | | |
| Wednesday, December 3, 2008 |
|
Welcome to the New England & Northeast Ski Forums - AlpineZone Forums. You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which only gives you limited access to view most discussions. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (private messages), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator. |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: PA
Posts: 96
| Which bump run would you rather ski? Option one http://www.flickr.com/photos/charles...51439/sizes/o/ Option two http://www.flickr.com/photos/skibumn...80274/sizes/l/ I would take option two if I was going to ski one of these runs a couple times but if I was going to lap one of them all day I'd chose one. How bout you? These are not my pictures. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Goose Stompin' Time! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cromwell, CT
Posts: 754
| Option 1. I don't like turns in my bump runs, it gives you opportunities to avoid people and to get out of other people's way, and for lapping purposes there's more variety. Although I do like the pitch in option 2 better.
__________________ 2008-09 Killington: 11/2, 11/20, 11/22, 11/23 (4 total) Sundown: 11/29, 11/30 (2 total) Overall: 6 |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Western Mass
Posts: 663
| I would choose the second run. It looks more interesting to me, especially along the sides & in the adjoining trees. The first run looks like fun but I'm not one to lap a bump run all day. I like variety so that's why I would want to ski both runs but I find the second one more interesting overall.
__________________ Jeff |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| it's sweeter up here...pure Vermont Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Waitsfield,Vt
Posts: 2,548
| Anyone know where is the first one wasshot? The second pic looks like Tower 3 Chute at JH
__________________ www.firstlightphotographics.com " Some failure in life is inevitable. It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you live so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all -- in which case, you fail by default," You know your a Vermont woodchuck if ya hear someone mention NSynch and your thinking it's where your dirty dishes are. Okay...that did happen to me but they were really piling up and was thinking they needed some attention. Last edited by ski_resort_observer; Aug 28, 2008 at 8:42 AM. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: The Warming Earth
Posts: 3,440
| I like this question. I’m going to say #1 although both look like a lot of fun. From the pics 1 looks much longer then 2. I could pick a different line each time and pound them out top to bottom. #2 has bumps on it, but I’m not sure I’d call it a bump run in the same sense #1 is. Besides the trees you also have the chock to skiers right. I’m thinking if you want to ski it as a bump run you’re skiing left as you’re going down hill. Both look great, but the question is about skiing bumps so #1 for me. Last edited by highpeaksdrifter; Aug 28, 2008 at 7:23 AM. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| The Bush Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Mattituck, NY
Posts: 4,558
| Quote:
__________________ Dave 35 Days 07/08 Season 6 Days 08/09 Season | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Finger Lakes Region
Posts: 1,214
| Cool question....Being I really don't like "bump runs" I'd pick 2 simply because it's more of a "steep" (which is my fav) than a zipper bump run. Pick #1 would cook my legs too quickly and I'd start to flop around like a fish out of water.
__________________ YOU WANNA SEE BIG AIR KID, PULL MY FINGER "OLD GUYS RULE" |
| | |
| | ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |