Ski New England - New England Hiking - New England Inns, Bed & Breakfasts and Hotels
Ski New England - New England Hiking - New England Inns, Bed & Breakfasts and Hotels
Ski New England - New England Hiking - New England Inns, Bed & Breakfasts and Hotels
Ski New England - New England Hiking - New England Inns, Bed & Breakfasts and Hotels
 Saturday, July 5, 2008
Northeast Skiing, Hiking, Lodging, Outdoor GearSkiingNortheast Skiing, Hiking, Lodging, Outdoor GearHikingNortheast Skiing, Hiking, Lodging, Outdoor GearLodgingNortheast Skiing, Hiking, Lodging, Outdoor GearGearNortheast Skiing, Hiking, Lodging, Outdoor GearForumsNortheast Skiing, Hiking, Lodging, Outdoor GearNewsNortheast Skiing, Hiking, Lodging, Outdoor Gear
Ski New England - New England Hiking - New England Inns, Bed & Breakfasts and Hotels


Welcome to the New England & Northeast Ski Forums - AlpineZone Forums.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which only gives you limited access to view most discussions. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (private messages), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact the administrator.

How Fat can an East Coast skier go?


I'd be quite surprised if the difference you felt between those skis had anything to do with that 3mm. You're talkin about less than one-tenth of an ...

Go Back   New England & Northeast Ski Forums - AlpineZone Forums > Other Forums > Gear and Equipment Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Nov 1, 2005, 9:24 AM   #21 (permalink)
ctenidae
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,540
I'd be quite surprised if the difference you felt between those skis had anything to do with that 3mm. You're talkin about less than one-tenth of an inch! JMHO

Sure, part of the diff was probably going from a less-than-high quality ski to a nice ski, plus the (seemingly) foot wide nose on the Heads, but it sure felt different. Among other sensations was a noticeable difference in the overall width.

Either way, the Heads are wider, and they skied better. Correlation may not equal causation, but I'm going with it.
ctenidae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2005, 9:24 AM
 
AlpineZone Supporter

Old Nov 10, 2005, 1:54 PM   #22 (permalink)
molecan
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boston, MA - Glen, NH
Posts: 114
Well,

I picked up a pair of 183 Volkl Gotama's over the summer, and they are 105mm waist, but with the severe upturn on the tail, look like they will actually ski much shorter.
I also was given a pair of (beater) 180 Explosiv's w/a 95mm waist.
The explosiv's were a friends _only_ ski for a season or two, mounted tele. They were used in all conditions, but when snow permitted, almost 100% off-piste.

I'm likely to try the explosiv as a day to day ski, and the Gotama I'd like be on as often as possible.

My day-to-day groomer ski was the Bandit X (70mm), which for my size is near useless in any deep snow, and after 30-40 days are feeling pretty dead.

I had a pair of 180 Atomic Beta Carv 9.11 (67mm?) I got a few years ago, which I will never ski again. Worst ski (IMO) I've ever owned.


I've never owned a ski w/more than 70mm waist before, so like the switch a few years back to a sub 200cm ski, w/sidecut, this will be an interesting test.
molecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2005, 2:53 PM   #23 (permalink)
Vano
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by molecan
Well,

I picked up a pair of 183 Volkl Gotama's over the summer, and they are 105mm waist, but with the severe upturn on the tail, look like they will actually ski much shorter.
I also was given a pair of (beater) 180 Explosiv's w/a 95mm waist.
The Explosivs may be ok in the east, but definitely not ideal. I skied them once, and even though they were very 'carvy' for such a wide ski 95mm under foot is still 95mm under foot. I haven't tried the Gotamas but i have heard that they are very versatile for such a wide ski.
Vano is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   New England & Northeast Ski Forums - AlpineZone Forums > Other Forums > Gear and Equipment Forum

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Humor: Are you a Real Skier or an Expert Skier? billski Northeast Skiing and Snowboarding Forum 34 Oct 5, 2007 11:11 AM
Bring the Chocodiles back to the East Coast! BeanoNYC Miscellaneous Discussions 1 Apr 22, 2005 9:35 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6

Ski Gear | Snowboard Gear | Cycling Gear | Camping/Hiking Gear | Ski & Snowboard Racks | Gear Outlet | Men's Clothing | Women's Clothing | Kids' Clothing

Alpine Skis | Ski Colorado | Ski Vermont
Sugarbush / Mad River Glen Message Boards | Whiteface / Gore Message Boards | Hourly Outdoor Gear Deals
Skiing | Hiking | Lodging | Gear | Message Board | News | Search | Site Map | RSS

 Advertising | Link to Us | Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1998 - 2008 AlpineZone. All Rights Reserved.