• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Theory for warm winter - Was it the Sunami?

Abubob

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
3,531
Points
63
Location
Alexandria, NH
Website
tee.pub
Henry Margusity's Sunami theory:

http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/meteomadness/heavy-thunderstorms-why-so-warm/62999

I may be nuts but I been trying to figure out why this winter was so warm and why the spring is now just amazingly warm. I stumbled upon something that may or may not be relevant. Below is an image of the Pacific Ocean's temperature anomalies and the debris field from the tsunami that hit a year ago. Notice how the two match up almost perfectly. The theory is that the debris floating in the Pacific caused a large area of warm water in the north Pacific, understanding that the ocean and atmosphere are coupled so if one changes the other changes; i.e. La Nina and El Nino's as perfect examples. So, if that area of the Pacific is warmed it will cause a natural boundary for storms to develop along. The last 90-day storm tracks show many of the Pacific storms developed right along that zone. In regards to the jet stream, instead of getting the typical split flow during the La Nina we had a roaring zonal flow across the north Pacific which basically did not allow the jet to buckle across the eastern part of the country and disrupted any blocking. So that's my theory. Maybe it's nonsense but it seems to have some merit.

590x553_03201425_severe2.png
 

WinnChill

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
921
Points
0
Wow, never heard that one. The warm pool in the Pacific started forming about a full year before the earthquake/tsunami, so my initial reaction is it had nothing to do with the debris field. Even then, the warm pool is contrasted by the significant cold pool in the Gulf of Alaska--hence their unusually stormy/cold winter.
 

speden

Active member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
913
Points
28
Interesting theory, but hard to imagine the relatively small amount of debris having such a major effect.

Reminds me of the old proverb:

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the message was lost.
For want of a message the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.
 

Abubob

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
3,531
Points
63
Location
Alexandria, NH
Website
tee.pub
Wow, never heard that one. The warm pool in the Pacific started forming about a full year before the earthquake/tsunami, so my initial reaction is it had nothing to do with the debris field. Even then, the warm pool is contrasted by the significant cold pool in the Gulf of Alaska--hence their unusually stormy/cold winter.

It took months for the debris to spread that far. If the debris didn't cause the anomalous high temps what did?
 

WinnChill

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
921
Points
0
It took months for the debris to spread that far. If the debris didn't cause the anomalous high temps what did?

These cold/warm pools get sloshed around amid other large scale temperature shifts, mainly due to shifting ocean currents and large scale upper air patterns. More noteworthy was/is the anomolous colder water in the Gulf of Alaska that helped anchor a strong vortex over Alaska--that in turn forced ridging over part of the US and disrupted the storm track. What was already a marginal storm pattern for us due to La Nina was knocked off a little more due to that. There are a lot of moving parts and configurations that affect seasonal patterns--one cannot pin seasonal anomalies on just one thing.
 

Abubob

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
3,531
Points
63
Location
Alexandria, NH
Website
tee.pub
Its all fairly unprecedented is it not? I don't think you can discount the factor the debris had. Anything floating on the surface would increase evaporation and many things over a vast area must have an effect. Still, what you say about the cold water and vortex is true and the debris field by itself didn't cause the pattern change. Could it be that these three occurrences together ended changing the overall pattern more than what would be expected? More data is needed to see if Henry's theory is viable. It will be interesting to see if more information is available in time.
 

WinnChill

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
921
Points
0
Its all fairly unprecedented is it not? I don't think you can discount the factor the debris had. Anything floating on the surface would increase evaporation and many things over a vast area must have an effect. Still, what you say about the cold water and vortex is true and the debris field by itself didn't cause the pattern change. Could it be that these three occurrences together ended changing the overall pattern more than what would be expected? More data is needed to see if Henry's theory is viable. It will be interesting to see if more information is available in time.

Not really. Just going back a little ways, March 2001, for example, had very similar ocean temps in that region. I'm sure there are other years, I just can't remember all of them. If his theory has merit, great--I just don't believe debris can affect ocean temperatures on that large of a scale.
 

Cannonball

New member
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
3,669
Points
0
Location
This user has been deleted
The tsunami debris is <25million tons. The Pacific Garbage Patch is ~100million tons. One why to judge the climatological effects of the tsunami debris would be in comparison to the much longer term trends of the garbage patch and Pacific weather patterns.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,127
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
The most amazing thing about the global heat map, is that the ONLY warm place in the ENTIRE friggin' world much of this winter was the eastern 1/2 of America.

Everywhere else experienced generally below normal temps, thus I'm going with the highly scientific hypothesis of Murphy's Law.
 

jaja111

New member
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
489
Points
0
Location
Spencerport, NY
apparently the change in when DST is the cause

542712_192926517488573_100003136782558_309083_857808528_n.jpg

When I saw this I felt so compelled to immediately drive to Arkansas, find Connie, and slowly choke the f-in life out of her while I explained that this, THIS is the punishment for stealing my oxygen.
 

legalskier

New member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
3,052
Points
0

Here's something else that floated across the Pacific-

Japanese fishing boat linked to earthquake, tsunami spotted off B.C. coast
Published On Sat Mar 24 2012
VANCOUVER—A 54-meter-long fishing vessel linked to last year’s devastating earthquake and tsunami in Japan has been spotted adrift off the British Columbia coast. *** As much as five million tonnes of debris were swept into the ocean last March when a massive magnitude-9 earthquake and resulting tsunami struck Japan.

Story: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...earthquake-tsunami-spotted-off-b-c-coast?bn=1
 
Top