I read about that the other day. The article said that type of release clause would probably become common in season pass agreements now.
...i.e., be careful what you sign.
A snowboarder suffered a serious injury at MC, requiring surgeries, weeks in hospital, and rehab. Some months later he filed suit. The following season he obtained a season pass there, which contained a release from liability for past injuries (as distinguished from releasing future claims). The trial court dismissed the lawsuit, and a court of appeals recently upheld that dismissal.
Here's a link to the decision (Dearnley v Mountain Creek): http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a5517-10.pdf
So if he'd gotten a pass somewhere else, his case could have proceeded.
I read about that the other day. The article said that type of release clause would probably become common in season pass agreements now.
Wow, that's interesting.
I'm a little surprised that he was allowed to ride at a place where he had a law suit pending. However, it worked toward the good of the resort in this case, eh?
Building a quiver is just foreplay for snowgasms
Or that soon after he sued, he signed a release containing this language: "I...RELEASE AND GIVE UP ANY AND ALL CLAIMS AND RIGHTS THAT I MAY NOW HAVE AGAINST MOUNTAIN CREEK RESORT, INC....THIS RELEASE APPLIES TO CLAIMS RESULTING FROM ANYTHING WHICH HAS HAPPENED UP TO NOW."
Seems fairly clear.
if i was suing a place, i wouldnt have the nerve to continue to go there
I'm assuming he didn't read the form before signing it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)