• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Jay Peak and I are not BFFs.

Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
161
Points
16
Location
The Hinterlands
As a hardcore Jay skier here are my thoughts on this thread in random order:

-Jay sucks for intermediate skiers;
-Jay is not great for groomers, Stateside is OK and that's about it;
-Jay glades are awesome. Anyone who says Jay is not top three out east for glades is either trolling, jealous or delusional;
-Jay is awesome for the variety of unmarked terrain - my own ski map of Jay has 78 official runs and 42 unmarked glades;
-Jay is awesome for slackcountry opportunities;
-Jay is awesome for kids;
-The tram is slow and inefficient but the top cannot handle that many skiers anyway. Waiting for the tram to ski Vermonter or Northway is something I will never understand. Otherwise, ski the tram very early or very late. As fun as some of the runs off the ridge are, none is worth a 40 minutes wait;
- Outside of a few Saturday and windhold days, there are no line-ups at Jay. Hence I fail to see the need for high-speed lifts. Even on a busy Saturday, you can ski most glades without seeing anyone else. That's what slow lifts will do for you. I love slow lifts;
- Arguably best snow and longest season out east (not counting having one run open over an extended period of time);

Quoted for truth. It is a mountain that grows on you, and what grows on you are the quirks, the weather, the screwy trail map, the community, the passion, the snow, the view, the trees, the wind and where do I stop? It is a mountain that rewards the creative, the resilient and the adventurous and, yes, it does take some getting used to.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,182
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Stowe glades "better" than Jay? How do you define that?

I'm not getting that either.

Only advantage I see is the stuff off Sterling Pond via Stowe or Smuggs is pretty great, but that's slackcountry and not within the borders and I'm not sure we're counting that? Though if we did, then a Jay skier could likely point to the similar run to the road off Timbuckto.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
27,971
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I'm not getting that either.

Only advantage I see is the stuff off Sterling Pond via Stowe or Smuggs is pretty great, but that's slackcountry and not within the borders and I'm not sure we're counting that? Though if we did, then a Jay skier could likely point to the similar run to the road off Timbuckto.

I would say that area is an added bonus along with the hundreds of acres skiers left of Chin Clip.

I think what MMW is referring to is that pretty much the entire Mansfield side of the mountain and much of Spruce has essentially developed glades between every trail that at many ski areas would be on the map. On Upper Mansfield, really the only area that hasn't been cut much is between Liftline and Starr. There are some lines in there, but I've found they don't open up much except for in big snow years. Between every other trail though, it's pretty much wide open. Same thing at MRG with all the glades between their marked trails.

Jay's glades are fantastic, but I'll take Mansfield.
 

polski

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
758
Points
0
Location
NE MA
Website
twitter.com
- Outside of a few Saturday and windhold days, there are no line-ups at Jay. Hence I fail to see the need for high-speed lifts. Even on a busy Saturday, you can ski most glades without seeing anyone else. That's what slow lifts will do for you. I love slow lifts;
Hear hear. And even for someone who skis groomers not glades, more high-speed lifts would mean a lot traffic on the slopes, not necessarily a more enjoyable experience. I hit Jay after a 2-foot dump in Feb 2013 and had a blast but mid-afternoon the second day there was one run near the top, I forget which, that we were taking to a glades entrance and it was like a six-lane superhighway with a LOT of people bombing very fast and a lot of the surface scraped off despite all the new snow. We got to the near-solitude of the glades and were like, WHOA, what was THAT??? A distinctly sour note on an otherwise great trip. Then again my own bias is towards a place like MRG with one fixed-grip single chair to the top, capacity 500 skiers per hour.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
more high-speed lifts would mean a lot traffic on the slopes, not necessarily a more enjoyable experience.

This is a big myth. The reality is that capacity can be controlled with a high speed lift. Aspen, for example, has some low-capacity high speed lifts. And keep in mind that while the cable is running faster, there are fewer chairs on that cable.

Here is why Jay would benefit from more high speed lifts. Jay is cold and windy. A skier is coldest when riding the lift. Jay would be a much more appealing place to ski if you could minimize the amount of time you are on the lift itself. They could do this while keeping capacity exactly the same. Of course, the downside is that, if capacity is the same but the lift ride itself is shorter, lines would increase somewhat. So I can see both sides of the coin.
 

fbrissette

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
1,672
Points
48
Location
Montreal/Jay Peak
This is a big myth. The reality is that capacity can be controlled with a high speed lift. Aspen, for example, has some low-capacity high speed lifts. And keep in mind that while the cable is running faster, there are fewer chairs on that cable.

Here is why Jay would benefit from more high speed lifts. Jay is cold and windy. A skier is coldest when riding the lift. Jay would be a much more appealing place to ski if you could minimize the amount of time you are on the lift itself. They could do this while keeping capacity exactly the same. Of course, the downside is that, if capacity is the same but the lift ride itself is shorter, lines would increase somewhat. So I can see both sides of the coin.

The main reason for high-speed chair (which are more expensive) is to increase capacity. While it is true that they could capacity the same it would be en economic non-sense.
 

SIKSKIER

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
3,667
Points
0
Location
Bedford and Franconia NH
Please Note: The Tramside Carpet is closed for the season, the Flyer Quad is closed for midweek operations but is slated to spin this coming Friday.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
While it is true that they could capacity the same it would be en economic non-sense.

Since Jay Peak has gone the resort route, there is some economic sense to be had by elevating the customer's experience on the mountain. It helps to sell hotel rooms. On the other hand, it's certainly possible that they don't need help and that the rooms are selling just fine.
 

dlague

Active member
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Messages
8,792
Points
36
Location
CS, Colorado
As a hardcore Jay skier here are my thoughts on this thread in random order:

-Jay sucks for intermediate skiers;
-Jay is not great for groomers, Stateside is OK and that's about it;
-Jay glades are awesome. Anyone who says Jay is not top three out east for glades is either trolling, jealous or delusional;
-Jay is awesome for the variety of unmarked terrain - my own ski map of Jay has 78 official runs and 42 unmarked glades;
-Jay is awesome for slackcountry opportunities;
-Jay is awesome for kids;
-The tram is slow and inefficient but the top cannot handle that many skiers anyway. Waiting for the tram to ski Vermonter or Northway is something I will never understand. Otherwise, ski the tram very early or very late. As fun as some of the runs off the ridge are, none is worth a 40 minutes wait;
- Outside of a few Saturday and windhold days, there are no line-ups at Jay. Hence I fail to see the need for high-speed lifts. Even on a busy Saturday, you can ski most glades without seeing anyone else. That's what slow lifts will do for you. I love slow lifts;
- Arguably best snow and longest season out east (not counting having one run open over an extended period of time);

To ride the tram for Vermonter or Northway - it is a take it once in a day type of deal. However, Valhalla, Green Beret, Face Chutes and Tuckermans and the various runs that you can make out of those runs are worth the trip. Not heavily traveled, and when there is snow up there it can be very fun! Early and late season the tram is useless otherwise.

As for intermediates, I totally disagree. There are intermediate runs off every chair. In addition, there are intermediate glades all over the place for those starting out in the woods. Even some of the black rated trails are very skiable by intermediates such as The Jet and Derrick Hot Shot.

Groomers, we had to ski them this past Sunday since the glades were firm in the morning and all the intermediates like Angles Wiggle, Hells Crossing, non flat sections of Northway skied really nice, the runs off The Jet chair were awesome JFK skied really well, Goat Run and GMB, Ullrs and Wedelmaster all skied great. If you are skiing a trail and are one and done then maybe there is some credence to your statement otherwise there is plenty to keep most people busy and I did not mention others.

I agree with everything else!
 

fbrissette

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
1,672
Points
48
Location
Montreal/Jay Peak
As for intermediates, I totally disagree. There are intermediate runs off every chair. In addition, there are intermediate glades all over the place for those starting out in the woods. Even some of the black rated trails are very skiable by intermediates such as The Jet and Derrick Hot Shot.

Directly off the Bonnie and Flyer, you have access to a grand total of 4 intermediate runs (Northway, Ulr's, Alligator Alley and Goat run. Four and that's it. All four are extremely traveled and the latter is an ice-fest pretty much year-round. There are some interesting intermediate terrain on the lower mountain (flash, racer, lower goat, but you are pretty much stuck with the above four run to get there ALL the time. These four runs also act as collectors so you get lots of advanced skiers and beginners on them. Other resorts have entire pods totally dedicated to intermediate skiers with lots of options and where no expert will ever show up (Stowe for example has 2 chairs serving pretty much only intermediate terrain with something like 25 runs).

Much of stateside is advanced intermediate (a bit intimidating for the true intermediate skier), and Montrealer takes you straight back to the Northway.

Intermediate skiers can have fun at Jay, but there are much much better resorts for them.
 

dlague

Active member
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Messages
8,792
Points
36
Location
CS, Colorado
Directly off the Bonnie and Flyer, you have access to a grand total of 4 intermediate runs (Northway, Ulr's, Alligator Alley and Goat run. Four and that's it. All four are extremely traveled and the latter is an ice-fest pretty much year-round. There are some interesting intermediate terrain on the lower mountain (flash, racer, lower goat, but you are pretty much stuck with the above four run to get there ALL the time. These four runs also act as collectors so you get lots of advanced skiers and beginners on them. Other resorts have entire pods totally dedicated to intermediate skiers with lots of options and where no expert will ever show up (Stowe for example has 2 chairs serving pretty much only intermediate terrain with something like 25 runs).

Much of stateside is advanced intermediate (a bit intimidating for the true intermediate skier), and Montrealer takes you straight back to the Northway.

Intermediate skiers can have fun at Jay, but there are much much better resorts for them.

I will give you that but we cherry pick our days and have not experience tough conditions three trips there. Before advance terrain was available to my wife she still liked it! Now she definitely has more options so the experience is better for sure!


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,182
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
it was like a six-lane superhighway with a LOT of people bombing very fast and a lot of the surface scraped off despite all the new snow. We got to the near-solitude of the glades and were like, WHOA, what was THAT??? A distinctly sour note on an otherwise great trip.

That was most likely Goat Run, which even this past Saturday, deep into the ski season with low attendance, felt like the Grand Central Parkway. I imagine it would/could be scary for a low-level intermediate or even true intermediate skier.

The main reason for high-speed chair (which are more expensive) is to increase capacity. While it is true that they could capacity the same it would be en economic non-sense.

True, but he's not wrong. Some places use the "over-capacity" issue as an excuse (SEE: Smuggler's Notch) not to have to invest millions in new lift(s).
 

MadMadWorld

Active member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
4,082
Points
38
Location
Leominster, MA
I'm not getting that either.

Only advantage I see is the stuff off Sterling Pond via Stowe or Smuggs is pretty great, but that's slackcountry and not within the borders and I'm not sure we're counting that? Though if we did, then a Jay skier could likely point to the similar run to the road off Timbuckto.

If we are not talking about slack country then that makes my case against Jay even better. Throw out West Bowl and the stuff in between it and BP. Throw out Big Jay, and everything beyond Timbuktu. What your left with is the ridge....this puts it in the top 5 discussion by itself. The rest of the glades on the map are pretty blah that lack any real character. No super steep gnar chutes with no way out rock bands. The trees are all neatly spaced as if someone measured the space between each one. All the glades allow skiers to easily link turns without any serious challenge. That is why Stowe is better. And the Mansfield backcountry is far superior to BJ and West Bowl.
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,863
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
No super steep gnar chutes with no way out rock bands. The trees are all neatly spaced as if someone measured the space between each one. All the glades allow skiers to easily link turns without any serious challenge. That is why Stowe is better.
That's what I was getting at as to the definition of "better"!

Perhaps to you more gnar is "better". But to many others, Jay's marked glades provides better progression without having to commit to unknown rock bands!
 
Top