• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Looks what is back for 2015

Puck it

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
9,681
Points
48
Location
Franconia, NH
One of the most loved and classic all-mountain skis of all time, The Monster, is back, with a newly revamped design. Left-to-right: The Monster 108, Monster 98, Monster 88 and Monster 83.

I hope they do the old one's justice. I may go back to Head skis if they are.
Head_1.jpg
 

gmcunni

Active member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
11,500
Points
38
Location
CO Front Range
look nice.. i'm not a fan of the more "graphic" graphics. i think i owned a pair of head skis back in the 80s
 

Puck it

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
9,681
Points
48
Location
Franconia, NH
The Monster 88 was an unbeatable ski. This could be the replacement for my Hell and Backs.


A review from the SIA

Last season Head debuted their use of Graphene materials in their line of women’s Joy skis. This year they combined an old name with that same new technology. Meet the 2016 Head Monster 98. A beast of a ski with a lighter weight and friendly touch. The Monster 98 joins a new line including 83, 88 and 108mm widths. Head has geared this ski for true all mountain use. It is light enough for the backcountry, versatile enough for the sidecountry and fast enough to rip the groomers. It features an Allride Rocker ERA 3.0, and a structured UHM C base. Basically, it has a great all mountain rocker and a durable base with an awesome tune. The topsheet has a high gloss and the yellow logo pops like a neon lamp in the snow. Tip and tail protectors are included with skin tabs on the tail for easy and secure uphill travel.At 6’1″ 180lbs, I tested the 184cm length. They also come in a 163, 170, and 177cm with dimensions of 135/98/120 and a radius of 21.3m at the 177cm length. Although I prefer a longer ski, the 177cm would also work for me in tight turning conditions but on this test I stuck to more open terrain near the American Flyer lift at Copper Mountain in Colorado. There was about 3 inches of fresh snow that day and conditions were sunny and soft.My first reaction to the ski was that it handled the groomers like a much narrower ski. While it didn’t turn incredibly short, it held on to a turn very well. Releasing the heels was was relatively easy, but this ski wants the full arch. It handled speed impeccably and the rockered tip made turn initiation and transition smooth yet aggressive. The performance in bumps was reliable and predictable but only a bit stiff. It handled crud and chop very well, providing a stable and trusty turn. Although marketed as a light weight , tourable setup, I didn’t find the Monster to be impressively light but it wasn’t heavy either. If you spend most of your time in the resort and maybe do a few hike-to terrain runs off the top of the lift, this would be the ski for you. I’m not sure if it would be suitable for a multi day hut-to-hut trip. This is an excellent option for skiers who want the performance of a frontside ski with a freeride/backcountry twist or for those want to replace their REV series skis with the next new thing.​
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,331
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Sick!!!!!!! So excited!!! Still have the Monster 76 and 102's and use them. You just made my day!
 

keyser soze

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2008
Messages
282
Points
18
I've got the Fischer Ranger 88s and am loving them. They are not he ones with the nicer graphics, but they are light and nimble and hold an edge great. I haven't had them on crud yet, but maybe this weekend///////
 

〽❄❅

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
474
Points
16
Location
Philadelphia
^ The Monster 88 didn't fare so well in Ski mag buyers guide 88mm to 98mm mixed snow East category. Only got higher ratings in "stability at speed", "hard snow integrity" and "crud performance". Lowest score of the group in "playfulness" and "quickness / bumps".

Ski mag didn't include the Monster 98 and 108 in their 98mm to 108mm mixed snow West group where they ranked Nordica's Enforcer best in test.
 

St. Bear

New member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
2,946
Points
0
Location
Washington, NJ
Website
twitter.com
〽❄❅;912268 said:
^ The Monster 88 didn't fare so well in Ski mag buyers guide 88mm to 98mm mixed snow East category. Only got higher ratings in "stability at speed", "hard snow integrity" and "crud performance". Lowest score of the group in "playfulness" and "quickness / bumps".

I didn't ski the original, but isn't that exactly what they were known for? Hard charging, damp, expert oriented skis?
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,331
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
〽❄❅;912268 said:
^ The Monster 88 didn't fare so well in Ski mag buyers guide 88mm to 98mm mixed snow East category. Only got higher ratings in "stability at speed", "hard snow integrity" and "crud performance". Lowest score of the group in "playfulness" and "quickness / bumps".

Ski mag didn't include the Monster 98 and 108 in their 98mm to 108mm mixed snow West group where they ranked Nordica's Enforcer best in test.

That does not surprise me. Head skis are generally damp.
 

Puck it

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
9,681
Points
48
Location
Franconia, NH
You really think so? I love the Palmers, they've treated me very well, but I think they're somewhat soft. I skied Blizzard Bonafides in CO and they were what I imagine stiff damp skis to be, and I hated them. Maybe I'm just too fat.
They are made in the Head factory and have the double metal like the old monsters. That is why I bought them.
 

〽❄❅

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
474
Points
16
Location
Philadelphia
I didn't ski the original, but isn't that exactly what they were known for? Hard charging, damp, expert oriented skis?
Idk anything about the original, but noticed the allot of guys on the forums getting excited about the reissue. While I don't like chattery and sketchy on icy hard-pack, at my < less then 150lbs weigh class, hard charging and damp sounds like it won't be a ski i'd want to be on when venturing off the groom into the trees and bumps. I could see it being great on skied off to no snow hard-pack icy'ish days, but i'm not looking for a groomer zoomer with some fresh soft snow capabilities. Will likely pass on this one. Especially without a demo day or two on it.
 
Top