Stenger and Quiros Ousted from Management of Jay Peak and Burke

I was referring to the universities in Metro Boston. The explosion in technology and pharmaceutical companies in the area has been driven by companies choosing to locate near Harvard, MIT etc. to grab the graduating talent. Throw in arguably the best healthcare in the country and you have a recipe for growth even with high taxes and cost of living.

GE as an example. Yes, they didn't like the tax changes in CT, but they chose MA over NY despite NY offering more money.

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/articl...vince-general-electric-to-pick-boston-over-ny

deadheadskier said:

I was referring to the universities in Metro Boston. The explosion in technology and pharmaceutical companies in the area has been driven by companies choosing to locate near Harvard, MIT etc. to grab the graduating talent. Throw in arguably the best healthcare in the country and you have a recipe for growth even with high taxes and cost of living.

Click to expand...

Yes, there's no doubt Metro Boston (Cambridge especially) is a booming hub for biotech, and biotech startups. The biggest in America in fact.

But what you don't realize is that Massachusetts gives them extremely juicy tax incentives at a whopping > $1 BILLION per year, as well as grants, and even most-favored-nation financing to locate & stay there. Because these companies actually aren't paying the "high taxes" you speak of, they can thus attract talent with high compensation they otherwise couldn't offer and offset the relatively high cost of living . You take away those huge tax incentives, grants, and favorable financing, and all the other things you mention really dont matter much.

BenedictGomez said:

Yes, there's no doubt Metro Boston (Cambridge especially) is a booming hub for biotech, and biotech startups. The biggest in America in fact.

Click to expand...

My company moved a ton of our R&D jobs from NJ to that area of MA (granted we also merged with a company several years ago that already had a big research presence in that area of MA which probably made the decision even easier for us).

I am aware of the tax incentives BG. All I said was taxes aren't the only driving factor in what drives growth.

Where are you getting > $1 Billion in tax incentives a year? I'm seeing 25 million in local property tax relief and up to $120 Million in various state benefits.

I know that my employer actively places it's offices where it expects to find the best technology talent. In the USA that means Boston, Chicago, Seattle, and the Bay Area. The tech business is booming and finding an educated workforce is important.

mbedle said:

Where are you getting > $1 Billion in tax incentives a year? I'm seeing 25 million in local property tax relief and up to $120 Million in various state benefits.

Click to expand...

In toto.


EDIT: Oops, I see that I wrote "per year", which is obviously wrong.

http://vtdigger.org/2016/05/27/181089/



[h=1]State: SEC Receiver must maintain water system at Jay Peak[/h]May. 27, 2016, 12:01 pm by Anne Galloway 12 Comments









The SEC-appointed receiver told homeowners at the subdivision that Jay Peak could no longer maintain the water system at non cost. Photo courtesy of Steve Baker

Editor’s note: This story has been updated with new information based on a letter from Michael Goldberg to Jay Peak Subdivision II on May 26.
For 50 years, second homeowners at a Jay Peak Resort subdivision have had access to free water, but that perk will likely be another casualty of the EB-5 scandal.
Michael Goldberg, the court-appointed Securities and Exchange Commission receiver who is running Jay Peak Resort, told more than 30 homeowners last week that the resort could no longer afford to maintain a water system for them at no cost.
The state says the system must be inspected because tests have shown elevated levels of manganese, a naturally occurring mineral. The cost of cleaning and repairs could be as much as $150,000, Goldberg says.
In a letter to residents, Goldberg said ownership of the water system would be transferred to a homeowners association and residents would need to pay for the maintenance themselves. He gave the residents less than two weeks to find an alternative. In an interview, Goldberg said that he wanted to put residents on notice right away because of potential public health effects, and in retrospect he said the letter was “too harsh.”
“I have no problem giving them more time, I have no problem fixing it, but they have to pay for the maintenance,” Goldberg said. “We’re not a charity where we can afford to incur costs for a bunch of second homeowners at the expense of victims, employees and contractors. We wanted them to know they have to step up and take responsibility. The days of free water, unfortunately, are over. We can’t afford to do that.”
Goldberg said the water system maintenance issue “is purely a money issue.”
“We will not cut off the water, but we put them on notice so that they drink the water voluntarily,” Goldberg said. “I don’t know what the health effects are.”
The financial situation at Jay Peak is “dire,” Goldberg says, and he is trying to identify cost savings in order to stabilize the resort in the aftermath of a massive alleged fraud perpetrated by former owners Ariel Quiros and Bill Stenger.
“I need every dollar to keep this asset open,” Goldberg said. “I am making this decision so we don’t have to shut down the resort. If that happened, home values would collapse. It’s in [residents’] interest to keep the hotel open; it’s in the investors’ interest to keep it open, it’s in employees’ interest to keep it open and it’s in the state’s interest. I need to make the hard decisions.”
The U.S. District Court of South Florida wrested control of the resort away from the Quiros and Stenger on April 13, a day after the SEC filed a lawsuit alleging that the two men had misused $200 million in EB-5 immigrant investor funds. Of that amount, Quiros is accused of stealing $55 million for the purchase of Jay Peak and Burke Mountain resorts and a condo at Trump Tower among other expenditures. As a result of the fraud, 700 investors may not be fully repaid, contractors are owed about $6 million for construction projects, and expensive maintenance projects, including the repair of a tram line, have been deferred.
Steve Baker, one of the second homeowners, says there is “no money to run our well system because it’s in Trump Tower.” Baker says their situation is “trivial” compared with the $2 million owed to DEW Construction, but he said Goldberg’s office jumped the gun and “got the whole neighborhood on the war path” because they think he’s going cut off water to the subdivision.
“I’m not try to paint Goldberg as a bad guy,” Baker said. “But it’s a knee jerk response. It’s an expense, and they’re trying to shed expense very quickly.”
“I think if Goldberg wanted to strike a different tone, we’d all be willing to pay a water fee,” he added. “Or he could pay for legal fees to remove the restrictive covenants so we can drill our own wells.”
Baker says residents are prohibited from drilling their own wells because of a deed restriction and consequently must rely on the resort for water. Under local and state laws, Jay Peak has no alternative except to continue to maintain the system, according to state officials.
The resort owns the subdivision and the water system, according to Ellen Parr Doering, the deputy chief of the state’s water quality division for the Department of Environmental Conservation. Jay Peak holds the state permit for the water system, which is not easily transferrable to another entity, Parr Doering says, and if the resort wants to charge fees for maintaining the tank and piping system, it must obtain approval from the Department of Public Service.
“In the past, Jay Peak operated and maintained the water system for free,” Parr Doering says. “That’s why we have this complication. That’s not typically how it happens. I’m not surprised some of these things have come up. These sorts of handshake deals are a thing of the past.”
In a letter to Goldberg sent on Wednesday, the Department of Environmental Conservation said the receiver must continue maintaining the water system or risk penalty assessments.
The issue has come up before. In 2013, Baker says Bill Stenger, the former CEO of Jay Peak, asked residents to pay $17,000 a year for improvements that he said had been made to the system.
Baker says the system at one point was leaking 16,000 gallons a day (“that’s a small brook”) in one homeowners lawn, and his own yard was declared a wetland in part because of a water system leak.
Baker suggested at an October 2014 meeting that Jay Peak had to go through the Department of Public Service to set water rates. In response, he says Stenger told residents that their deeds stipulated that they form an association and pay for our own water.
“We were saying ‘you want us to pay for a system you don’t maintain?’” Baker recalled.
Baker said none of the residents had seen the requirement in their deeds or closing packages. “He said, then go back and sue your attorneys for missing it at the closing,” Baker recalled. Thirty people hired independent attorneys for the closings and “no one found [the requirement] anywhere.”
Residents subsequently didn’t hear anything about paying for water until Goldberg contacted them last week, Baker says.
On Thursday, Goldberg sent another letter to homeowners, telling them that they drink the water at their own risk. In addition, he urged them to form a homeowners association and reiterated that the resort cannot incur costs related to maintenance and repairs to the water system. Internal memos show that attorneys for the receiver expect the homeowners to pay for the costs up front, rather than billing for reimbursement.

Hmm, yes home owners should pay into a water system they use. That said, another crazy law structure in VT for their options. Unreal.

"Federal Judge Orders a Preliminary Injunction Against Quiros"

http://vtdigger.org/2016/05/31/federal-judge-orders-preliminary-injunction-against-quiros/

halfpintvt said:

"Federal Judge Orders a Preliminary Injunction Against Quiros"

http://vtdigger.org/2016/05/31/federal-judge-orders-preliminary-injunction-against-quiros/

Click to expand...

This quote was particularly interesting:

Meanwhile, the overall value of the Jay Peak Resort is significantly lower than an appraisal obtained by Quiros last year, according to the SEC. Quiros maintains Jay Peak is worth close to $87 million, while an economist for the federal regulator estimates the value at $41.6 million, and the SEC says the resort owes $60 million to investors and third parties. Other liabilities include a $7.7 million wastewater treatment facility was never built.

A spreadsheet showing resort income versus revenue as of February 2016 showed a $6.2 million net income loss for the 2015-2016 ski season, SEC documents show. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization were in the red by about $900,000.

Click to expand...

thetrailboss said:

This quote was particularly interesting:

Click to expand...

So overall Jay is worth $41.6 mil - $67.7 mil of outstanding debt or negative $26.1 mil, add to that, the fact that it looses about $1 mil a year. It will be interesting to see which mountain (Burke or Jay) is easier to sell. This does not even touch on Jay's issues with water for property owners, waste water system, erosion that have all been in the news lately. Seems like the former Jay operators were good at sweeping things under the rug.

burski said:

So overall Jay is worth $41.6 mil - $67.7 mil of outstanding debt or negative $26.1 mil, add to that, the fact that it looses about $1 mil a year. It will be interesting to see which mountain (Burke or Jay) is easier to sell. This does not even touch on Jay's issues with water for property owners, waste water system, erosion that have all been in the news lately. Seems like the former Jay operators were good at sweeping things under the rug.

Click to expand...

Yes, I am just learning about all those issues now. Holy crap.

thetrailboss said:

http://digital.vpr.net/post/foreign...&mc_cid=9abd972d84&mc_eid=62e7045b13#stream/0

Click to expand...

It was interesting to note that they actually have extra job created from some of the earlier Jay Peak projects.

mbedle said:

It was interesting to note that they actually have extra job created from some of the earlier Jay Peak projects.

Click to expand...

It seems as if everything was working fine at first but then they began to run behind with their revenue (hence the start of the Ponzi scheme).

thetrailboss said:

It seems as if everything was working fine at first but then they began to run behind with their revenue (hence the start of the Ponzi scheme).

Click to expand...

Yep, built too much too fast. Almost unfolding infrastructure-wise as Kingdom-Tele forecast.

Jay Peak lost > $6M last season?

Yeah, so much for that theory that the waterpark and ice rink are ginormous cash cows that shield Jay Peak from bad seasons.



<----- Still skeptical about the claimed waterparknomics

Court approves Jay Peak Tram repairs.

https://jaypeakreceivership.com/wp-...and-for-Approval-of-Passenger-Tramway-1-1.pdf

halfpintvt said:

Court approves Jay Peak Tram repairs.

https://jaypeakreceivership.com/wp-...and-for-Approval-of-Passenger-Tramway-1-1.pdf

Click to expand...

But in the meantime...
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/...tate-orders-jay-peak-tram-shut-down/85299034/