• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Vail to buy Stowe?

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
They've always been sandwiched in between Stowe to the north and its lofty reputation and Killington to the south
From a business perspective, touting your place as more "natural" and "least crowded" means that you have lost the race.

I think that Sugarbush will be fine, but I don't think that a business as usual attitude is going to work. If I were Win, I'd be talking to ski areas out west that have had to go head to head with Vail. I'd be looking to form alliances. I'd be thinking long and hard about what my customer base is going to look like and how to go after them. He needs to be proactive about this.

They probably don't have the money, but folding Sugarbush into the Peak Resorts portfolio would make a lot of sense. Having Hunter and Sugarbush on the same pass would appeal to a LOT of New Yorkers. And you've also got the Boston crowd covered with the New Hampshire resorts. But maybe since they already have Mount Snow it would be diminishing returns for Peak.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,337
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
From a business perspective, touting your place as more "natural" and "least crowded" means that you have lost the race.

I think that Sugarbush will be fine, but I don't think that a business as usual attitude is going to work. If I were Win, I'd be talking to ski areas out west that have had to go head to head with Vail. I'd be looking to form alliances. I'd be thinking long and hard about what my customer base is going to look like and how to go after them. He needs to be proactive about this.

In sum, I'd be making a serious pitch to join the Mountain Collective in Stowe's place.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
In sum, I'd be making a serious pitch to join the Mountain Collective in Stowe's place.
I think the Mountain Collective makes a lot of sense, but it's really only attractive to people that are going to make a trip out west. There are a whole lot of eastern skiers that won't be doing that. So I think that it's a partial answer, but more is needed.
 

rtjcbrown

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
160
Points
16
What is that long angled building with no label? Just above Mill House/General Store
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,414
Points
113
Location
NJ
What's the date on that plan? It doesn't even look like it matches anything they've built recently so I'm thinking it isn't the current Master Plan.
 

Jcb890

Active member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
1,741
Points
38
Location
Central MA
I think the Mountain Collective makes a lot of sense, but it's really only attractive to people that are going to make a trip out west. There are a whole lot of eastern skiers that won't be doing that. So I think that it's a partial answer, but more is needed.
I looked at the Mountain Collective, but it didn't really make enough sense. Unless you planned a trip to at least 2 of the resorts, it doesn't seem to help all that much since it is only 2 passes for each mountain. Whistler and Stowe will now be coming off of the Mountain Collective as well.

If it provided 3-4 or 5 tickets to each mountain like the MAX Pass does, it would make more sense to me.
 

Jcb890

Active member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
1,741
Points
38
Location
Central MA
I don't know Win, but I would wager a lager sum of money that I've read more CEO statements than 99% of posters on this board (regretfully, as they're almost universally painfully boring), and after you've read a few thousand statements like that, you get pretty good at quickly discerning their motivation, their hidden (they erroneously think well) agenda, and at reading between the lines. So you're right, I dont know the guy, but I'd stake my life on his being worried by Vail/Stowe after reading his open letter.
Perhaps maybe not fear, but he's at least worried or concerned, which is proven by the simple fact that they put out a letter like this at all.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,127
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
That said, their pass offerings have responded to pressure by becoming so fragmented.

I think they're about to get even fragmentier'. ;)

That definitely looks much more natural and less crowded. :smile:

I'm genuinely loathing this "ski megalopolis" craze that's taking over.

Ten or Fifteen years from now, I see myself frequenting the Plattekills and the Mad River Glens of the world far more often (Smuggs too, on the odd-chance Smuggs is still Smuggs).
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,414
Points
113
Location
NJ
I looked at the Mountain Collective, but it didn't really make enough sense. Unless you planned a trip to at least 2 of the resorts, it doesn't seem to help all that much since it is only 2 passes for each mountain. Whistler and Stowe will now be coming off of the Mountain Collective as well.

If it provided 3-4 or 5 tickets to each mountain like the MAX Pass does, it would make more sense to me.

I'm not a big fan of the Mountain Collective structure either, although I believe it does give you 50% off single day tickets at the participating resorts once you use the 2 included ones. So you could theoretically visit only 1 resort on the list and use the pass for 6 days (2 "free" + 4 50% off) and that could cover the cost of the pass.

I do like the way MAX does it better though.
 

benski

Active member
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
1,114
Points
36
Location
Binghamton NY
What's the date on that plan? It doesn't even look like it matches anything they've built recently so I'm thinking it isn't the current Master Plan.

I think its from around when the gate house was built. Its a perfect copy of the pre Castlerock pub addiction Gate House so likely the hight of the real estate bubble. I think after 2008 this was thrown out. The rice/gad/whatever area is 2 huge building as opposed to the I think 5-7 smaller building. Those big building could not have been built at the cautiousness they have taken recently.
 

slatham

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
2,412
Points
83
Location
LI/Bromley
I think they're about to get even fragmentier'. ;)



I'm genuinely loathing this "ski megalopolis" craze that's taking over.

Ten or Fifteen years from now, I see myself frequenting the Plattekills and the Mad River Glens of the world far more often (Smuggs too, on the odd-chance Smuggs is still Smuggs).

And Magic? Magic will still be Magic......
 

raisingarizona

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,054
Points
83
Not to turn this into another Sugarbush thread, but you have to admit that Win is indeed concerned. They've always been sandwiched in between Stowe to the north and its lofty reputation and Killington to the south and its reputation. Stowe was just sold to a HUGE ski resort player. And I've read that Killington's Base Area expansion was finally approved....whether it happens or not we have yet to see. So once again Sugarbush has to try to distinguish itself from these two.

And for the record I like Win. Always have. He's done a great job. But let's understand that it is a tough business and competition is fierce.

With the right marketing I would think that that should be pretty easy. Well maybe not easy but possible.
 

snoseek

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
6,260
Points
113
Location
NH
4000 acres of skiable terrain? Come on now!?! That's not very truthful.


Haha yeah that a big ol stretch for sure. As far as the east goes its sitting on a HUGE chunk of skiable property but 4000 acres is ridiculous.

I imagine Sugarbush will do fine in the end. It will be the goto place in Northern VT if you want a large diverse mtn without dealing with ridiculous amounts of people. It would make sense for them to hook on with MC for sure. In the long run if they keep the same prices people may come back after dealing with the shitshow that will become Stowe.
 

Jcb890

Active member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
1,741
Points
38
Location
Central MA
I'm not a big fan of the Mountain Collective structure either, although I believe it does give you 50% off single day tickets at the participating resorts once you use the 2 included ones. So you could theoretically visit only 1 resort on the list and use the pass for 6 days (2 "free" + 4 50% off) and that could cover the cost of the pass.

I do like the way MAX does it better though.
I don't think its a terrible deal, I just felt like we'd get more bang for our buck using the MAX Pass.

How much was the MC Pass?
Does anyone have any info or stats on how well it sold?
 
Top