• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Vail Purchases Okemo, Sunapee, Crested Butte, and Stevens Pass

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,128
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
I hate to break it to you BG, but PLENTY of "rich" people drive Suburban's and/or full sized Escalades.

Have you ever been in a Suburban? I only wonder because it's odd to compare it to an Escalade, which yes, plenty of "rich" people drive.
 

MommaBear

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
710
Points
18
Location
CT
I hate to break it to you BG, but PLENTY of "rich" people drive Suburban's and/or full sized Escalades. Here's why.... Rich people often have kids. And often 2,3, or 4+ kids. Kids take up space, and especially when it comes to sports, have stuff, which also takes up space.

Suburban's and Escalades have a ton of room behind the 3rd row of seats. Far more than a Cayenne has (my wife drives an Audi Q7 which is the same platform as the Cayenne is on, and I can 100% tell you that when the 3rd row of seats is in use, there's not much more room for more than 3 or 4 medium sized boot bags behind the 3rd row) Suburban's and Escalades are superior size wise for hauling a bunch of gear, or in non ski season say a good chunk of a kids soccer or lacrosse or softball team around one's home town.

Plus, if you haven't been in one recently, they're nicely appointed. And for a "rich" person often a 3rd or maybe 4th car

Sent from my XT1254 using AlpineZone mobile app


Exactly why we had a Suburban - 3 kids plus multiple friends, ski gear, baseball gear, lacrosse gear, camping gear. Tons of space for kids and gear. My husband will be happy to find out we are "rich"! :beer:
 

sull1102

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2010
Messages
737
Points
18
Location
Boston, MA
To give you an idea, that Suburban is for rich people nowadays. It starts at $50,200...a new BMW X5 starts at $57,200... Land Rover Discovery $52,100... the numbers are no longer that far apart and yes those are the base base base model numbers that you will never ever see on the dealer lots, gotta have at least some options these days. A "middle class" suv nowadays would be more along the lines of the Explorer coming in at $32,140 and yes that is a very different vehicle capability wise and class wise the Explorer is a solid size down being a jumbo sized crossover.
 

WWF-VT

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
2,598
Points
48
Location
MA & Fayston, VT
Mass and Boston are two very different things, otherwise you stated my very point perfectly. The drive to Stowe is much more difficult than many other options. Boston as a city has good options 90 minutes away and very very good options under 3 hours away. Stowe you are pushing over 4 hours, not many are doing that every weekend. Look at season passes, people that own condos and townhouses etc etc, there are FAR more CT and NY folks than MA overall and Eastern MA even more so.

Sent from my Pixel using AlpineZone mobile app

FWIW I live just outside Boston and my trip to Sugarbush averages 3:15 and Stowe is about the same drive time for me. 80% of the non-resident owners at my condo complex are from MA. Sugarbush and Stowe are an easy drive on 89 through NH and VT.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,415
Points
113
Location
NJ
FWIW I live just outside Boston and my trip to Sugarbush averages 3:15 and Stowe is about the same drive time for me. 80% of the non-resident owners at my condo complex are from MA. Sugarbush and Stowe are an easy drive on 89 through NH and VT.

Yea...I'm a bit confused why he argued that the drive to Stowe is "much more difficult" and "over 4 hours". Google maps also shows around what you're stating from Boston to Stowe along with the majority of the drive being on interstates.

I'd also agree that the majority of the condo owners in my complex at Sugarbush are from MA. I don't see why we'd have a huge number of MA people in SB but further north you'd have less from MA and more from NY. That makes little logical sense.

Sure people from Boston also have a lot of choices in NH and ME that are as far or even closer than Stowe, but that doesn't mean they're not going to Stowe.
 

sull1102

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2010
Messages
737
Points
18
Location
Boston, MA
220 miles to Stowe vs 150 to Loon from the South Shore area is a big difference. Also if you arent factoring traffic on a Friday night and all the loveliness that comes with it you certainly should. I was never saying no one from Boston goes to Stowe, felt it was pretty clear I was saying more people go to NH and ME than go to Stowe, really not that crazy of an idea seeing as basically the entire industry east of the Connecticut River survives on the Boston market alone and always has.

Sent from my Pixel using AlpineZone mobile app
 

gregnye

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2012
Messages
377
Points
18
One last thing before I stop ranting about Vail

I really hate the feel of most of Vail Resorts Websites. They are just so corporate and have no personality. In particular the one for Vail, Breckenridge and Keystone.

What I look for in a ski website is not just a list of the trails open, but a summary of the conditions produced by some sort of spokesperson or weatherman. While some resorts are overly enthusiastic (Killington) or straight up lie (Cannon) about conditions, it is better than having no write up at all.

I never could find a condition writeup on most of Vails websites, except for A-basin. I guess they just expect you to come anyway and they couldn't be bothered to hire someone to write something other than a number of how much snow they got. And no, I don't want to follow them on facebook to see the conditions.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,415
Points
113
Location
NJ
Vail can't actually increase the total number of super rich can they?

Sure. They have warehouses full of super-rich people that they're stock-piling. Then when they buy another mountain they drop off loads of them at the Chevy dealers closest to the mountain to buy all the Suburbans and release them on their merry way.
 

Harvey

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
1,269
Points
83
Location
North River, NY
Website
nyskiblog.com
^^LOL'd for real.

I am so totally uninterested in these East/West conglomerate ski passes. Cheap to buy and expensive to implement and use.

Agree. I saw a bunch skiers this year, who weren't chasing the best snow, because it wasn't on their pass.
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,810
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
Agree. I saw a bunch skiers this year, who weren't chasing the best snow, because it wasn't on their pass.
Define "best". Then define "best snow".

People have different likes. And cost is one of them. Within a geographic region, there're multiple mountains having similar snow pattern. The one on "their pass" gets the same snow as the one that are not. Unless you've only got an Epic pass that is (for last year).
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,764
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
Sure. They have warehouses full of super-rich people that they're stock-piling. Then when they buy another mountain they drop off loads of them at the Chevy dealers closest to the mountain to buy all the Suburbans and release them on their merry way.

OMG - that was the best post yet.... lol
 
Top