• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Vail Purchases Okemo, Sunapee, Crested Butte, and Stevens Pass

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,412
Points
113
Location
NJ
These aren't Whaleback sized hills. Perhaps the best way to compare would be by terrain acreage and not number of resorts--then we could get a better deal of whether it really is a monopoly or not.

Interesting idea. In Colorado, Vail owns about 1/3 of the skiable acreage. Not even close to a monopoly. The purchase of Crested Butte only increased their acreage ownership in Colorado from 31% to 33%.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,331
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Interesting idea. In Colorado, Vail owns about 1/3 of the skiable acreage. Not even close to a monopoly. The purchase of Crested Butte only increased their acreage ownership in Colorado from 31% to 33%.

Again, the issue is the amount of marketshare that Vail controls in Colorado (as in skier days). Not acreage.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,412
Points
113
Location
NJ
Again, the issue is the amount of marketshare that Vail controls in Colorado (as in skier days). Not acreage.

In terms of market-share, it looks like the Vail resorts (pre-Crested Butte) had about 40% of the state's ski visits (rough number based on using reported visits from Vail's resorts vs the combined total for the Colorado Ski Country USA member resorts which essentially account for most of the non-Vail ones). Still not a monopoly.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,120
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Not all Colorado acreage is equal; I think it's pretty clear a company like Vail would rather own a "Denver accessible ski area", which I'd define as: Arapahoe Basin, Beaver Creek, Breckenridge, Copper Mountain, Keystone, Loveland, Vail, and Winter Park). They've got 1/2 of those locked-up.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,412
Points
113
Location
NJ
So if I bought an Okemo pass early "before the price went up" how do I go about getting my money back for the difference between that price and the Epic pass?

Ask Okemo's Season Pass Office? Although I suspect the answer right now would be that they can't do anything until the deal officially closes.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,412
Points
113
Location
NJ
Not all Colorado acreage is equal; I think it's pretty clear a company like Vail would rather own a "Denver accessible ski area", which I'd define as: Arapahoe Basin, Beaver Creek, Breckenridge, Copper Mountain, Keystone, Loveland, Vail, and Winter Park). They've got 1/2 of those locked-up.

True...but they can't lock up any more of them without getting into anti-trust territory again. After they bought Keystone, Breck, and A-Basin, the DOJ forced them to sell A-Basin. So I wouldn't expect them to be able to buy Copper, Winter Park, Loveland or A-Basin even if they wanted to.
 

spiderpig

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2012
Messages
270
Points
18
Location
Ridgefield, CT
Ask Okemo's Season Pass Office? Although I suspect the answer right now would be that they can't do anything until the deal officially closes.

I suspect since they're a publicly traded company that Vail is not in the business of giving away money.
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,805
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
As for being cheaper to fly to the Alps, that may be true (although I doubt it) if you have no bags to bring with you. I'm not a fan of going on a ski vacation without bringing a bag or two.
So you haven't flown to Europe!

"A bag" is typically FREE! Now if you can't your skis in "a bag", then perhaps that's indeed hopeless for you.

(I have no idea whether it's "cheaper" to fly to Europe, not knowing what to compare it to)
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
So you haven't flown to Europe!

"A bag" is typically FREE! Now if you can't your skis in "a bag", then perhaps that's indeed hopeless for you.

I've been to Europe numerous times. As a matter of fact, I was just pricing a ticket to Montenegro today. As an Italian citizen, I can assure you that I know a thing or two about flying to Europe.

You said:

t is cheaper to fly across the Atlantic than the Mississippi if you know where to look i.e. Norwegian. and then hop on Easyjet or RyanAir


Let's give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you are only bringing one checked bag. The cheapest ticket from Boston to London (seven night stay) for all of February is $486 on WOW Air. (Departing February 26th.) This includes one checked bag and no carry-on bag other than a briefcase or purse. With skis, the price goes to $612. That just gets you to London, mind you - but your plan has you transfer to Easyjet or Ryanair. If we use Easyjet for our example, you will pay another $137 USD for a flight to Zurich. If you have skis, your Easyjet ticket goes to $235.

So... using the absolute cheapest date for the entire month of February, the cheapest you can get to the Alps using your system - if you bring one checked bag, but no carry-on and no skis - is $623. If you want to avoid renting skis, the price goes to $847.

If you can't get to the Rockies for less than that, you are an absolute moron. Just the fact that you expected me to believe that a bag is free on a LCC across the Atlantic makes you a moron. Even Delta and other legacy carriers are now charging for a checked bag across the Atlantic. Compare that to Southwest offering up to two free bags here in the United States.

And let's not forget the downside to connecting to Ryanair or Easyjet. If your flight into London is delayed, they aren't going to care since your trip is not booked on a single ticket. And the layovers are almost always longer when you cobble together two separate tickets.

Before you spout off, you really ought to know what you are talking about.
 
Last edited:

djd66

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Messages
836
Points
63
I've been to Europe numerous times. As a matter of fact, I was just pricing a ticket to Montenegro today. As an Italian citizen, I can assure you that I know a thing or two about flying to Europe.

You said:



Let's give you the benefit of the doubt and say that you are only bringing one checked bag. The cheapest ticket from Boston to London (seven night stay) for all of February is $486 on WOW Air. (Departing February 26th.) This includes one checked bag and no carry-on bag other than a briefcase or purse. With skis, the price goes to $612. That just gets you to London, mind you - but your plan has you transfer to Easyjet or Ryanair. If we use Easyjet for our example, you will pay another $137 USD for a flight to Zurich. If you have skis, your Easyjet ticket goes to $235.

So... using the absolute cheapest date for the entire month of February, the cheapest you can get to the Alps using your system - if you bring one checked bag, but no carry-on and no skis - is $623. If you want to avoid renting skis, the price goes to $847.

If you can't get to the Rockies for less than that, you are an absolute moron. Just the fact that you expected me to believe that a bag is free on a LCC across the Atlantic makes you a moron. Even Delta and other legacy carriers are now charging for a checked bag across the Atlantic. Compare that to Southwest offering up to two free bags here in the United States.

And let's not forget the downside to connecting to Ryanair or Easyjet. If your flight into London is delayed, they aren't going to care since your trip is not booked on a single ticket. And the layovers almost always longer when you cobble together two separate tickets.

Before you spout off, you really ought to know what you are talking about.

Skiing in Europe is cheaper than skiing in Colorado = Fake News. FYI - United Direct to Denver is $350
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Skiing in Europe is cheaper than skiing in Colorado = Fake News. FYI - United Direct to Denver is $350

That being said, most people probably overestimate the cost of skiing in Europe.

Of course the Epic pass helps keep the cost of skiing out west down quite a bit, which is something that abc completely overlooked.
 

farlep99

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
266
Points
18
Location
VT
Skiingin Europe is cheaper than skiing in Colorado = Fake News. FYI - United Directto Denver is $350

Not quite fake news because skiing in Europe depends on alot of things. Where in Europe? There are lots of places there. Switzerland= expensive. France, ditto. Dolomites- can be, but there are some good cheap options. Austria- lots of cheap options (this is where I’m most familiar with). Also exchange rate- a year or two ago the dollar and euro were basically even money. That was a great deal for dollar holders. That absolutely made the cost of skiing (i.e.lift tickets) much cheaper than most U.S. options and generally speaking far more terrain for the money.

A lot has changed in just the last few years. Used to be you could fly Lufthansa, Austrian,or Swiss airlines & skis went for free. I believe they’ve all stopped that now. And fares were generally in the $500-600 range rt (from NYC this isn’t ancient history, I’m talking 2012-2016 time frame. But past few years it seems fares are closer to $800ish & then you have to find a way to pay for skis if you’re going to bring them. Otherwise rent, which is pricey for multiple days. So yeah, Colorado is probably cheaper now, and it is especially so if you have Epic or Ikon. But a few years-ago you probably could’ve gotten a Euro trip cheaper, or at least very close to the cost of CO. And in a couple years it could change again. Or not.
 

JimG.

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
11,988
Points
113
Location
Hopewell Jct., NY
So, how long before European resorts start buying up US ski resorts to offer multi ski area passes to compete with IKON, Epic, etc.?
 

mister moose

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
1,086
Points
48
I fail to see how this is a bad thing for consumers.

1) Eastern price increase down the road
2) $18 hamburgers and $20 parking.
3) Unbundled marked up everything.
4) Big day ticket rates scare off new entrants and last minute skiers

The cheap pass is the hook, not the entire product.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
1) Eastern price increase down the road
2) $18 hamburgers and $20 parking.
3) Unbundled marked up everything.
4) Big day ticket rates scare off new entrants and last minute skiers

The cheap pass is the hook, not the entire product.

I hear what you are saying, but this ignores that skiers have a choice. They don't have to go to a Vail resort. You can, for example, ski Burke and get food and lift tickets at half the price or less. But... this allows countless skiers who buy the Epic Pass to save a LOT of money, both on their local hill and on trips out west.

I understand that you may not like the model, but having another option out there that saves certain people lots of money is indeed consumer friendly.

This may change, but setting speculation aside, this is a good thing for consumers at this moment in time.
 
Top