• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Who actually has the Most Powerful Snowmaking System?

canobie#1

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
424
Points
16
Stratton is so overlooked. They have almost all their trails up by Christmas.
 

Madroch

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
1,490
Points
0
Location
ct
Can't believe I'm saying this but okemo has been pretty aggressive the last couple of falls.. They do well considering altitude issues... Must have some firepower...
 

catskills

Active member
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
1,345
Points
38
If you got the guns and you don't take them out of the barn until the middle of December what good is it?
 

Highway Star

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
2,921
Points
36
There is a big variation on how rugged certain trails are. If you've never hiked or poached on thin cover, you really don't know.
 

doublediamond

Active member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
452
Points
28
If you got the guns and you don't take them out of the barn until the middle of December what good is it?

Uh...

1. Lower cost snowmaking
2. Lower risk snowmaking
3. Limited skier base early season

You can have just as profitable if not more profitable operations if you wait a bit. A benefit is you canoffer cheaper passes and tickets. Face it, not many people actually ski early season. The limited WRODs and limited lifts fool us with their crowds/lines. Spread those folks out over a fully open mountain and the ski area suddenly is a ghost town.

Sure you can use a WROD as a marketing tool and you can make money couple of ski areas have had success on this front. But many ski areas don't bother. Stowe has an increadibky powerful system and they don't bother to open until around Thanksgiving ever year. The HKDs and SnowLogic are altering the math with much cheaper snowmaking costs.
 

Tin

Active member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
2,996
Points
38
Location
ZooMass Slamherst
We've seen your shitty poach job on DF. It definitely doesn't make you an expert on the topic



back%20seat.png
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,213
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
I think the reality is that today, verses a decade ago or so, with the widespread implementation of low e air/water guns and also more and more fanguns in use, let alone lots more actual data about snowmaking efficiency and also a better understanding of how much snow a resort typically needs on a trail over the course of a season to meet their operational goals, that it's not so easy to figure out who really has the most powerful snowmaking system. Hence the use of the term "smart snowmaking" as a bit of a buzz phrase in the industry now.

In the past you could base it on how much compressed air a resort had available or how much water they can pump per minute, or possibly how many guns they can run simultaneously. Nowadays, that's not such a clear cut thing as to what stat is the true sign of "the most powerful" system.

More and more though it seems like the biggest rate limiting factor these days is how much water can a resort pump per minute, as many systems that use a large percentage of low e guns seem to max out on water use before air use, in the past it was often the reverse of that, so that shift needs to be factored into the "most powerful" equation for sure.

In reality, there are a bunch of resorts out there, depending on how they look at their data, could have their marketing departments spin a stat to make it seem like they're the "most powerful" - as long as ample amounts of snow are being produced, both to open terrain, build bases and then in the dreaded post thaw recovery times let the marketing folks lay claim to their "most" superlatives as we're all out on the hill enjoying the product!
 

Highway Star

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
2,921
Points
36
Again - "most powerful" - by definition, only means one thing. How much POWER does the snowmaking system have available in the water pumping and air compressor systems. PERIOD.
 

MEtoVTSkier

Active member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
1,234
Points
38
Location
Aroostook County, ME
Most "volume" of SNOW in a given amount of time, amount of air or water doesn't matter... who can make the MOST amount of snow in a given amount of time.
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,721
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
Its all relative. For example, SR can push over 9000 GPM of water at peak production. BUt when they try to make on both the East and West ends at once, that push is significantly reduced due to pushing in two directions simultaneously. They have not fnished it, but they are working to build another pump base out of Jordan to A: boost the overall water pump by 50% and B: to allow for 100% pump capacity when making on both ends. Now, a smaller area like Crotched can push its max water all the time because they don't need to push miles just to get the water to the next trail pod/peak. Killington is hampered by the same dynamic I'm sure as SR when trying to make over on Bear or Skyeship base and out of the K1 base at the same time. Luckily, for the world cup race, Killington is usually concentrated to areas out of the general K1 base and can have 100% of their water push being fully utilized in production at that time.
 

steamboat1

New member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
6,613
Points
0
Location
Brooklyn,NY/Pittsford,VT.
I'm pretty sure snowmaking on the K-1 side is completely independent from snowmaking at Bear/Skye Peak. Separate compressors & separate water sources. K-1 side uses compressors located halfway up Snowshed & Snowshed Pond as the water source. Bear/Skye Peak uses compressors on the side of the Bear parking lot & the pond also located there as the water source. Running both at the same time should have no effect on the other. Except energy costs of course.
 

Highway Star

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
2,921
Points
36
I'm pretty sure snowmaking on the K-1 side is completely independent from snowmaking at Bear/Skye Peak. Separate compressors & separate water sources. K-1 side uses compressors located halfway up Snowshed & Snowshed Pond as the water source. Bear/Skye Peak uses compressors on the side of the Bear parking lot & the pond also located there as the water source. Running both at the same time should have no effect on the other. Except energy costs of course.

Killington can pump it's full air and water capacity anywhere on the mountian (minus losses). There are several pumphouses mid mountain.
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,721
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
Killington can pump it's full air and water capacity anywhere on the mountian (minus losses). There are several pumphouses mid mountain.

Same is true at SR with mid mountain pumps. If steamboat1's post is correct, then Killington cannot push full flow if only making on the K1 side at the time. I doubt this is true.
 
Top