• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

2011 K2 Aftershocks w/bindings on Demo Tracks

KKCT

New member
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
4
Points
1
Location
CT
I found a great deal on these Aftershocks, the problem is they say that the bindings are mounted on 'demo tracks'. Does anyone know if the demo tracks will effect the performance of the skis and/or bindings? From everything that I've read, the Aftershocks are great skis. If the binding on the demo track are crap, I don't want to have drill more holes into my new skis to mount the bindings normally.

Any feedback would be greaty appreciated.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,456
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
If they mean a demo binding setup they mean that the bindings are a "shop" binding that can be adjusted to any boot size. In terms of performance, it is middle of the road for a binding. Nothing special. The biggest problem is that if someone likes your skis when you are in the lodge they can adjust the bindings with a screwdriver and take off.
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
They will be fine. They do lift you up a little more than you might on a regular binding, but are fully functional and safe. I just bought a pair of demos myself.
 

KKCT

New member
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
4
Points
1
Location
CT
If they mean a demo binding setup they mean that the bindings are a "shop" binding that can be adjusted to any boot size. In terms of performance, it is middle of the road for a binding. Nothing special. The biggest problem is that if someone likes your skis when you are in the lodge they can adjust the bindings with a screwdriver and take off.

The bindings are Marker MX12s. Mounted on the demo rails. The bindings themselves seem pretty decent, I am just worried about the demo rails.
 

Hawkshot99

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
4,489
Points
36
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
It is the exact same heal and toe for the bindings. the difference is the part that goes between the heel and toe. On the consumer model there is a solid piece connecting them, and you need to remove the entire binding from the ski to adjust them. On the demo, they slide onto the same track, just have a screw system that allows quick adjustment. You can ski the demo system no problem as a everyday ski.
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,220
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
It is the exact same heal and toe for the bindings. the difference is the part that goes between the heel and toe. On the consumer model there is a solid piece connecting them, and you need to remove the entire binding from the ski to adjust them. On the demo, they slide onto the same track, just have a screw system that allows quick adjustment. You can ski the demo system no problem as a everyday ski.

I had an older pair of Atomic B5 Metrons with demo bindings on them that I skied for a couple of seasons (until I ripped a good chunk of edge out of the one day courtesy of a rock :smash: ) when I got a new pair, also B5 metrons in the same length, this time with non demo bindings, the only difference in them was the "regular" pair were a few ounces lighter. Performance wise/durability wise, absolutely no difference between them
 

KKCT

New member
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
4
Points
1
Location
CT
:-D
I had an older pair of Atomic B5 Metrons with demo bindings on them that I skied for a couple of seasons (until I ripped a good chunk of edge out of the one day courtesy of a rock :smash: ) when I got a new pair, also B5 metrons in the same length, this time with non demo bindings, the only difference in them was the "regular" pair were a few ounces lighter. Performance wise/durability wise, absolutely no difference between them

Great...that makes me feel better about my purchase. :-D

Has anyone skied the K2 Aftershocks? I've never skied a ski that's so wide underfoot (86). Was wondering how it handles on groomers?
 
Last edited:

Hawkshot99

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
4,489
Points
36
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
:-D

Great...that makes me feel better about my purchase. :-D

Has anyone skied the K2 Aftershocks? I've never skied a ski that's so wide underfoot (86). Was wondering how it handles on groomers?

I am not a huge fan of the Aftershocks(not a huge fan of the non-twin tip K2 skis) but they handle very good on hard pack. They have a sheet of metal in them to stiffen up so there is little chatter, and when you lay them over they hold a very good edge. Dont be afraid of the 86mm waist width. They will handle just fine.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,182
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
It is the exact same heal and toe for the bindings. the difference is the part that goes between the heel and toe. On the consumer model there is a solid piece connecting them, and you need to remove the entire binding from the ski to adjust them. On the demo, they slide onto the same track, just have a screw system that allows quick adjustment. You can ski the demo system no problem as a everyday ski.

Okay, I'll bite.

This begs the question, WHY not make all binding system demo ski type for the significantly increased convenience? I'm guessing there must be SOME justification and/or benefit of having the solid connection, my best guess is, increased stability.
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,220
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
Okay, I'll bite.

This begs the question, WHY not make all binding system demo ski type for the significantly increased convenience? I'm guessing there must be SOME justification and/or benefit of having the solid connection, my best guess is, increased stability.

Weight is a issue too. Most manufacturers for most models for the general public want their skis to be as light as possible for ease of most consumers. Demo bindings are heavier than non demo bindings
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,456
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
:-D

Great...that makes me feel better about my purchase. :-D

Has anyone skied the K2 Aftershocks? I've never skied a ski that's so wide underfoot (86). Was wondering how it handles on groomers?

Glad to hear! Enjoy!
 

Hawkshot99

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
4,489
Points
36
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
Okay, I'll bite.

This begs the question, WHY not make all binding system demo ski type for the significantly increased convenience? I'm guessing there must be SOME justification and/or benefit of having the solid connection, my best guess is, increased stability.

Weight is a issue too. Most manufacturers for most models for the general public want their skis to be as light as possible for ease of most consumers. Demo bindings are heavier than non demo bindings

Yup. The demo version weighs a tad more. Dont know the exact amount, as I have never weighed them.
 
Top