• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Cannon Mountain...thoughts

AdironRider

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
3,487
Points
63
Let's explore this. What would really change at Cannon under a lease (that hasn't changed already)? And there are a lot of private resorts that are very pro freedom and heritage of skiers (Jay, Bush, Smuggs, etc), even more so than Cannon. The Meullers scare me, though. But on the flip side, Okemo has a few established bump runs. I mean, hell, Cannon friggin grooms Paulie's now!

While I havent been a passholder for 4 years now at Cannon, I have a tough time believing that Cannon is offering a similar product to the Okemo, Snow, Sunapees etc.

Now a similar offering to Jay or the Bush now? I can see the comparisons to Jay, but the Bush seemed to be more of the destination type place the last couple times I was there with the condos etc theyve built at the base. Jay seems to be going this route as well.

On snow product? Maybe Cannon is there already, but I have a tough time believing they are giving the larger private resorts in NE a run for their money either in this regard.

If it went private I see a large investment in a complete overhaul of the snowmaking system. They have it pretty good with allllll that water right at the base, but I seem to recall the pipe/guns/etc being pretty old and dated when I was a passholder, and havent seen or heard much in the way of upgrades there.

Cannon, under private ownership, could be the gem of the Northeast in terms of pure skiing product with a commitment to snowmaking like some of the big dogs.
 

Puck it

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
9,681
Points
48
Location
Franconia, NH
Why would they right now with it turning a profit? They could get a higher lease price, but Lynch will never do this. Look what he isndoing do the Mueller's at Sunapee.
 

tjf67

New member
Joined
Sep 26, 2006
Messages
2,218
Points
0
Location
L.P.
Just to be clear, the proposal would be for Cannon to be privately operated, not privately owned.

Hey, how r those cuts you made skiing? Its that time of the year. Did they blow out yet? The dacks are going down faster than a whore at a Navy port.
 

riverc0il

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
13,039
Points
0
Location
Ashland, NH
Website
www.thesnowway.com
While I havent been a passholder for 4 years now at Cannon, I have a tough time believing that Cannon is offering a similar product to the Okemo, Snow, Sunapees etc.

Now a similar offering to Jay or the Bush now? I can see the comparisons to Jay, but the Bush seemed to be more of the destination type place the last couple times I was there with the condos etc theyve built at the base. Jay seems to be going this route as well.
I never made any such comparisons regarding the product. My comparisons to Jay, Bush, etc. were in regards to the spirit of the operations. Not many other places in the country offer the type of snow making and grooming of the Meullers and Mount Snow. I'd still compare Cannon a superior mountain to them all but their improvements in snow making and grooming are not in the same league as the big players in the man made categories.
 

threecy

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
1,930
Points
0
Website
www.franklinsites.com
Why would they right now with it turning a profit?
If you look at the past half century of media coverage, it's a similar model - in the good snow years, Cannon is a 'moneymaker'...when fickle New England winters return, it quickly builds up losses. It's not nearly as hard to show a 'profit' at a ski area that doesn't have private sector debt or real estate taxes.


They could get a higher lease price, but Lynch will never do this. Look what he isndoing do the Mueller's at Sunapee.
Lynch has never had as little power as he will have from 2011 to 2013.

Hey, how r those cuts you made skiing? Its that time of the year. Did they blow out yet? The dacks are going down faster than a whore at a Navy port.
?
 

AdironRider

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
3,487
Points
63
Just to be clear, the proposal would be for Cannon to be privately operated, not privately owned.

Yeah just mistyped ... whatever. When a decades long lease is in question, there really isnt much difference.
 

UVSHTSTRM

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
879
Points
0
would hate to see Cannon turned into the way most resorts are now..

What way is that? It's got lifts, lodges, a tram, wide trails, groomed to death, the interstate (which most don't have)? Trying to figure out what you mean, maybe you mean culture? of course you can go to Stowe, Sugarbush, Sugarloaf, Saddleback, Jay, Whiteface, Killington, etc and find a through and through skiing/local culture.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,340
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
I saw this on a truck at Bretton Woods a couple weeks ago...kind of weird seeing he was at Bretton Woods:

215619_10150161967509667_744459666_6705010_4649965_n.jpg
 

threecy

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
1,930
Points
0
Website
www.franklinsites.com
While Gov Lynch was against Sunapee's expansion it was the local community that was dead set against.the land swap

Had family in the area whilst that was all going down...the local community was definitely *not* all against it. Many welcomed the new jobs, tax revenue, and potential increases in property value.
 

St. Bear

New member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
2,946
Points
0
Location
Washington, NJ
Website
twitter.com
I think most of you are thinking too much like skiiers.

According to my contact in the Statehouse, Cannon is viewed as unprofitable, not modern, not a friendly ski destination for families, and a massive hole in the state park system.

They're not concerned with what the quality of ski will be like after they lease it out, or if there will be more snowmaking or groomed trails.
 

ski_resort_observer

Active member
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
3,423
Points
38
Location
Waitsfield,Vt
Website
www.firstlightphotographics.com
Had family in the area whilst that was all going down...the local community was definitely *not* all against it. Many welcomed the new jobs, tax revenue, and potential increases in property value.

Many didn't want the increased traffic and increased property taxes, which were already pretty high. The Town of Goshen voted down the expansion. My best friend who has been a builder in Newbury for 40 years was all for it but when I worked with him on his projects many people I talked to wanted it to stay the same size. Many locals felt that they had lost access when it went from your standard state park to a private lease. Building a bunch of condos will increase traffic but won't add very many jobs.

Like most other resort developements, those who will benefit financially are for it, those that don't are against it. This time, the latter won out.

If they voted to go for a private lease, I wonder if the Muellers will be interested. Personally, I don't see how someone could make any money unless you expand the real estate at the bottom of the Mitt and seemlessly connect the two ski hills. That's going to take a bunch of capital up front. Is nearby Loon or WV profitable? Is there some financial benefits to leasing from the state of NH vs normal private ownership?
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
27,921
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I think most of you are thinking too much like skiiers.

According to my contact in the Statehouse, Cannon is viewed as unprofitable, not modern, not a friendly ski destination for families, and a massive hole in the state park system.

They're not concerned with what the quality of ski will be like after they lease it out, or if there will be more snowmaking or groomed trails.

I guess I'd like to see the true numbers over the past 5 years. Your contact says Cannon is a money pit. Sikskier says it's been profitable.

I've always been emphatically against the lease as a 'skier'. The deals at Cannon for state residents are far better than those at Sunapee.

However, I guess I can't make a true informed opinion without seeing the balance sheets.
 
Top