• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Former Passholders Ask Court for Class Action Certification Against Killington

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,738
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
The suit between former "Lifetime Passholders" and Killington continues...the four plaintiffs have asked the Judge for certification as a class so that they can represent the other 1,239 members of the class. They claim that the resort was wrong in cancelling their passes.

The article.
 

riverc0il

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
13,039
Points
0
Location
Ashland, NH
Website
www.thesnowway.com
I still have yet to see an argument that indicates these folks are entitled to continued Lifetime Passholders given way the sale of the resort was handled. This one is getting filed under "groundless law suits against the industry that drive prices up" IMO.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,722
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
The only real way to tell is how the pass was marketed in the first place. If it was a lifetime pass to what was it then, Ski LTD, then I side with Powdr. If it was a lifetime pass to 'Killington Ski Resort' then I side with the pass holders.

There really is no precedent that I can think of that matches this. The closest thing would be golf courses. In this day in age the iniation fees for premier golf courses is a larger sum than the yearly dues over the course of many many years. Golf Courses change hands all the time, but when a new owner arrives, members don't need to re-up the huge initiation.

I know one thing is for certain, if I owned one of those passes, I would be certain when I bought it that ownership transfers were covered very clearly. Haven't read enough to know if that was the case or not.
 

hiroto

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
514
Points
16
Location
Newton, MA
The only real way to tell is how the pass was marketed in the first place. If it was a lifetime pass to what was it then, Ski LTD, then I side with Powdr. If it was a lifetime pass to 'Killington Ski Resort' then I side with the pass holders.

There really is no precedent that I can think of that matches this. ...

But isn't Killington itself the precedent? ASC bought Killington from Ski LTD and from the fact those people are complaining NOW implies that ASC did honor those passes when they bought Killington.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,738
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
But isn't Killington itself the precedent? ASC bought Killington from Ski LTD and from the fact those people are complaining NOW implies that ASC did honor those passes when they bought Killington.

ASC bought S-K-I's stock and its liabilities, including the Lifetime Passholders. When ASC sold Killington, Ltd. to SP Lands, they did it in an asset sale so that SP Lands did not have the liability.
 

bvibert

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
30,394
Points
38
Location
Torrington, CT
I still have yet to see an argument that indicates these folks are entitled to continued Lifetime Passholders given way the sale of the resort was handled. This one is getting filed under "groundless law suits against the industry that drive prices up" IMO.

I don't know the exact details, but this is the way it seems to me too.
 

dmc

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
14,275
Points
0
They don't stand a chance... It's pathetic at this point...
 

ski_resort_observer

Active member
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
3,423
Points
38
Location
Waitsfield,Vt
Website
www.firstlightphotographics.com
The lifetime passes, my father-in-law bought two back in 1962 for $1000 each, were issued by the Shelburne Corp long before Ski Ltd or ASC existed. After the couple who sued Powdr 6 months ago and lost miserably Powdr has threatned to countersue to recoup legal costs. The Vermont Attorney General wants no part of this sham.

Powdr is offering to honor the passes for two seasons.
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,541
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
However this works out legally, it seems that the new owners could have found a compromise that wasn't such a source of negative public relations.


If anything this past year or so, it seems that Powdr DOESN'T have any problem with negative publicity ;)

- no more lifetime passes
- delayed opening
- no hiking before opening
- not running Skyeship Base or Pico most midweeks
- early closing
- No BYOB for Bear Mtn Mogul Challenge

.....and probably a couple of others that I'm forgetting off the top of my head :rolleyes:
 

skiadikt

Active member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
1,081
Points
38
If anything this past year or so, it seems that Powdr DOESN'T have any problem with negative publicity ;)

- no more lifetime passes
- delayed opening
- no hiking before opening
- not running Skyeship Base or Pico most midweeks
- early closing
- No BYOB for Bear Mtn Mogul Challenge

.....and probably a couple of others that I'm forgetting off the top of my head :rolleyes:

you can add:

-no discount tickets for ski clubs
-outrageously high prices for the kiddie programs

they've essentially killed off the bmmc. it was the biggest dud i ever saw. in the old daze (even last year), the place was like woodstock.

i agree the suit is a waste of everyone's time but these guys are absolutely clueless and have done themselves no favors. there isn't one ski board i get on where the general vibe isn't anti-powdr. these guys have pretty much trashed whatever there was worthwhile of the k brand. nevertheless it's been a great season despite all the crap but then almost 300" will do that.
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,541
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
And as skiadikt mentioned, this in a banner snow year. Can you imagine the backlash if it had been a crappy snow year?

To some extent I bet that a few of the Powdr folks running Killington wish that it was a crappy snow year. Then they wouldn't have had the delayed opening flack and/or the "early" closing flack and they could have stuck with their original April 13th shut the place down plans.
 
Top