• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Chair falls from lift at Attitash

Edd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
6,715
Points
113
Location
Newmarket, NH
Having breakfast now at a joint a few miles from Attitash. Rumor is the man who was dropped from the lift was having drinks that same night at the Red Parka.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,391
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Sure, it turns out he's okay, but I'm sure the "mental trauma" is unbearable.

Are you suggesting that damages should only be awarded commensurate with physical injury?

I certainly think degree of injury should play the biggest factor, but if negligence is proven, that should be worth a fuck ton too. Not only to benefit the plaintiff, but to discourage Vail from cutting corners in the future.

The other factor to consider is you never know how the damage to his body from this event might result in unknown physical quality of life issues in the future. I say this from experience. I dislocated my shoulder in a skiing accident when I was 18. After the original recovery, I was fine until about aged 40. Now that shoulder is destined for surgery and I have to constantly do PT (lately self administered as I've done it enough with a therapist to know what I'm doing) and occasionally get cortisone shots. Two orthos have both said it is because of the dislocation when I was young. Hopefully this guy doesn't have similar problems.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,623
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Are you suggesting that damages should only be awarded commensurate with physical injury?

No, but the degree of physical injury is highly deterministic in terms of the level of real-world payouts. So the fact this guy appears to be 100% okay (AFAWK), will most likely hurt the sum of money the ensuing lawsuit (which we all assume's coming) will extract from Vail.
 

2Planker

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
1,665
Points
113
Location
MWV, NH
No, but the degree of physical injury is highly deterministic in terms of the level of real-world payouts. So the fact this guy appears to be 100% okay (AFAWK), will most likely hurt the sum of money the ensuing lawsuit (which we all assume's coming) will extract from Vail.
also depends on how it affects his future quality of life.....
Any personnel injury aka Ambulance Chaser would drool over this one....
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,722
Points
83
Are you suggesting that damages should only be awarded commensurate with physical injury?

I certainly think degree of injury should play the biggest factor, but if negligence is proven, that should be worth a fuck ton too. Not only to benefit the plaintiff, but to discourage Vail from cutting corners in the future.

The other factor to consider is you never know how the damage to his body from this event might result in unknown physical quality of life issues in the future. I say this from experience. I dislocated my shoulder in a skiing accident when I was 18. After the original recovery, I was fine until about aged 40. Now that shoulder is destined for surgery and I have to constantly do PT (lately self administered as I've done it enough with a therapist to know what I'm doing) and occasionally get cortisone shots. Two orthos have both said it is because of the dislocation when I was young. Hopefully this guy doesn't have similar problems.
That is not the case when the defendants conduct is merely negligent. Negligence, or a failure of ordinary care, entitles the victim to compensatory damages which are limited to their loss. If the conduct is reckless then the defendant can be liable for punitive damages.
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,722
Points
83
also depends on how it affects his future quality of life.....
Any personnel injury aka Ambulance Chaser would drool over this one....
You are right in that its an easy liability case but I think you're overestimating the value. If the victim isnt really hurt, the case isnt worth that much.
 

2Planker

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
1,665
Points
113
Location
MWV, NH
You are right in that its an easy liability case but I think you're overestimating the value. If the victim isnt really hurt, the case isnt worth that much.
I'm not estimating any $$$$$
Just know 2 attorneys who are making the rounds following up the case.....
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,391
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
One thing that made me realize that payouts often aren't what you might expect was a horrific event that happened to my grandmother. She was getting a crown at the dentist with that molding paste that goes in a tray to make an impression. It obviously wasn't intentional, but the dentist broke the mold when removing it and a piece went down her throat and ultimately perforated her bowel. She spent the last 4 years of her life with a colostomy bag because it was feared she wouldn't survive the reversal at her age.

The payout after 3 years of legal back and forth? $100k. I'd think being forced to carry around a bag of your own crap for the last 4 years of your life due to no fault of your own should be worth more than $100k. It constantly got infected and occasionally would leak. She basically didn't want to leave her apartment because of it. This was ten years ago. So, probably not that much more money today.
 

urungus

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
2,171
Points
113
Location
Western Mass

JoeB-Z

Active member
Joined
Mar 1, 2011
Messages
403
Points
28
That is not the case when the defendants conduct is merely negligent. Negligence, or a failure of ordinary care, entitles the victim to compensatory damages which are limited to their loss. If the conduct is reckless then the defendant can be liable for punitive damages.
Further, New Hampshire does not recognize gross negligence which is intermediate between negligence and recklessness. Given the waiver you agree to and the difficulty of proving recklessness plus the background of support for the ski industry I am starting to see that despite the drama, this case might not have a lot of value.
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,722
Points
83
deep pocketed ski corp may pay a decent penny to just settle it on the relative quiet, which is plenty valuable to a plaintiff and their lawyer
This is more the exception than the rule. Plaintiff and their lawyer are usually dealing with a penurious insurance company and not the actual culprit
 

KustyTheKlown

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
5,859
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn
right. usually defendant is not mega publically traded ski corp already having a rough run in the market, with a nasty publicity issue that is more of a threat than the actual liability
 
Top