Connect with us:

  • Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

The 2025-2026 SKI Magazine Rankings are In

C

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
7,003
Points
113
Location
NJ
Smellytele said:
Confused with likelihood to return. As the winner got 1/20 and the 20th place got a 20/20
Click to expand...

That confused the hell out of me at first as well. I think that is the ranking (i.e. 1st out of 20 as in survey respondents rated it as the resort they were most likely to return to). Super weird that they didn't just list it the same way as the ranking. Why put two different rankings in two vastly different formats?
 
thetrailboss

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,925
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Having two Maine areas top the list on the east is very interesting. It shows how far Saddleback has come.

I find interesting that Killington is not higher. I think that it should move up next year after more improvements and local ownership continues to implement their plans.

I also find it interesting that MRG dropped so far and based, at least in part, about "parking" issues. That seems pretty odd to me.

Looks like Jay got dinged for its aging lift infrastructure and resulting lines. Makes sense.

No Sunapee at all. That is weird as it is a very busy area.
 
thetrailboss

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,925
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
As to the west: no surprise that Big Sky is finally at the top. Considering the serious amount of money invested in the place, I am surprised that they have not been ranked higher. My only negatives with Big Sky is that it does not get as much snow as Utah (and it needs it for the terrain) and it can be very cold up there.

The comments for Park City do not match the ranking. And the comment that operations in 2024-2025 were better than in the past was very odd considering that last year was the strike over Christmas.

Pow Mow's position reflects the concern about the recent changes.

Solitude dropped a lot. Moving from 8 to 26. Definitely due to the parking and crowding issues. The volitle nature of their ranking (not in top 30, to 8, to 26) also is curious.

I am surprised that Steamboat is not higher considering the recent improvements. And it ranked 28 out of 30 for liklihood to return? Wow.

Loveland was the #1 in terms of liklihood to return, but yet only sits at 24. Must be the other categories hurt it. I can see that wind, basic facilities, and slow lifts are negatives.

Vail's move up from 21 to 12 is very interesting and counter to the Vail hate.

I am not sure why people ding Snowbird as to "lifts". Perhaps they mean lift lines? Snowbird has pretty much high speed lifts everywhere. When I first skied there they had twice as many double chairs as they have now.

Interesting that Jackson is where it is considering that folks generally like it. Perhaps the cost and accessiblity are weighing it down.

I expect Deer Valley will move up next season after the expansion. But 9th place is much worse than what they used to be. For years they were legitimately number one.

Alta's ranking certainly outperforms where I would expect it to be considering that it is relatively low-frills.

The big surprise for me is how high Grand Targhee is on the list--and that it beat Jackson Hole. With the exception of the new six pack, a lot of the lifts are starting to get old and they have a fair number of fixed grips still. Like Alta, folks apparently really appreciated character in this survey.

The Aspen resorts are about where I would think they would be.

Snowbasin moving to third is interesting. They also had a good snow year and have been improving lifts.
 
Last edited:
K

Keelhauled

Active member
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
224
Points
43
thetrailboss said:
Vail's move up from 21 to 12 is very interesting and counter to the Vail hate.
Click to expand...
My unpopular opinion is that Vail Mountain is a fantastic and largely well run ski resort. The only lack is true expert terrain and for >95% of skiers what they have is more than enough. Otherwise the mountain distributes crowds well, the infrastructure is top notch, the base village is pleasant and because Vail Resorts doesn’t run much real estate is actually less “corporate” than slope side at other mountains. It’s not a day skiers mountain but it doesn’t pretend to be and as a ski vacation #12 is very fair and arguably still a little too low.
 
jimmywilson69

jimmywilson69

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
3,650
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg, PA
Keelhauled said:
My unpopular opinion is that Vail Mountain is a fantastic and largely well run ski resort. The only lack is true expert terrain and for >95% of skiers what they have is more than enough. Otherwise the mountain distributes crowds well, the infrastructure is top notch, the base village is pleasant and because Vail Resorts doesn’t run much real estate is actually less “corporate” than slope side at other mountains. It’s not a day skiers mountain but it doesn’t pretend to be and as a ski vacation #12 is very fair and arguably still a little too low.
Click to expand...

agreed although I've only ever day tripped there...

The terrain is fine, sure there isn't much (if any) advanced expert terrain, what it offers in the back bowls and blue sky basin is not like anything else in the country. it TYPICALLY handles crowds even on a powder day well. Yes we've all see the nightmare videos/pictures of those long lines but I've personally never waited in a line that long there (or even close to that long) and I gather most typically don't. it would really really suck if you did though...
 
snoseek

snoseek

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
6,591
Points
113
Location
NH
jimmywilson69 said:
agreed although I've only ever day tripped there...

The terrain is fine, sure there isn't much (if any) advanced expert terrain, what it offers in the back bowls and blue sky basin is not like anything else in the country. it TYPICALLY handles crowds even on a powder day well. Yes we've all see the nightmare videos/pictures of those long lines but I've personally never waited in a line that long there (or even close to that long) and I gather most typically don't. it would really really suck if you did though...
Click to expand...
Ive only paid to park once at Vail and that was only because I had people with me that were ok with paying for the convenience. there's enough reasonably challenging terrain, but lets face it you go to CB or Telluride or Abasin for that. I really like the place for what it is and it is indeed huge. and then theres Beaver Creek...
 
jimmywilson69

jimmywilson69

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
3,650
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg, PA
The paid parking and finding said spot is kinda annoying. I'm to the point now where trying to find that allusive free spot is not worth my time. I'm on vacation and its part of the expense... Which is exactly what Mr. Katz and the Town of Vail want me to think! :ROFLMAO:
 
snoseek

snoseek

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
6,591
Points
113
Location
NH
jimmywilson69 said:
The paid parking and finding said spot is kinda annoying. I'm to the point now where trying to find that allusive free spot is not worth my time. I'm on vacation and its part of the expense... Which is exactly what Mr. Katz and the Town of Vail want me to think! :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
The free spots fill super early and yeah it's a super pain in the ass but im just a cheap bastard. I've not been in 4 or 5 years so I dont know the current status of those spots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top