gmcunni
Active member
i used to think 100mm or more was a fat ski but as i contemplate a new 1 ski quiver i'm thinking ~95.
What do you consider a fat ski these days?
What do you consider a fat ski these days?
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
You can either call Dan
After seeing what was under people's feet and leaning on the ski racks last week during a big powder week in Utah, my definition of how fat is fat went up by a good 20mm or so! One had to be seriously bow legged to ski on some of the sticks that folks had out there!
this pic from Magic over the weekend is what got me thinking that my definition of FAT was old.
this pic from Magic over the weekend is what got me thinking that my definition of FAT was old.
Would not have minded having one of those instead of the all-mountain skis I was on...couldn't get any float out of them and I couldn't chop through the tracked out stuff either...this pic from Magic over the weekend is what got me thinking that my definition of FAT was old.
My new Theorys are 95. When I saw them in person I thought they would turn like a toaster. Not true.
what binding did you go with?