Which is why I have stated my argument in normative terms. I did not claim that relocating your learners' area to the G lift would necessarily be required to satsify the heightened duty of care that I think applies to ski areas when they assume the responsibility of teaching someone to ski. Perhaps that would require your developing a whole new learners' area. Or maybe you've done everything right and don't need to change a thing. Based on your trail map, it looks like there are better places to teach people to ski than on a runout that services three high capacity lifts. However, as you mention, that is a matter for the courts to decide. I can only assume that your attorneys will have a better argument than that your critics are somehow "under-informed."
If I understand where the accident happened, I wouldn't really call that a 'run-out'. Its a gentle slope.
Oh - I see - you're calling it a run out, or thinking of it that way, because a lot of higher mountain trails can head toward it. Yeah, I've only skied Jay for 4 days, but really, if I understand the spot, that wasn't really where we ended up from up top all that frequently.