KustyTheKlown
Well-known member
::suppresses urge to be rude and condescending::
get skis that are an appropriate length for your height and weight, guy.
get skis that are an appropriate length for your height and weight, guy.
-
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
The right short ski for intermediate skier
- Thread starter Clemson
- Start date
bdfreetuna
New member
178cm is probably the correct recommendation if you are not a very good skier.
If you are a decent skier IMO 185 is the correct length. Mostly because once you are comfortable going fast you will start to appreciate a ski that is stable at higher speeds. And if you like skiing slow I would think you'd want one that goes in a straight line at least.
I am 6 foot and 195lbs currently. Weight doesn't matter, I've been anywhere between 150lbs and 220lbs and never thought to go less than 185. Height matters a bit more, your style of skiing matters the most.
I usually recommend planning to advance, if you are an intermediate, and not waste money on intermediate gear when you should be spending time on the fundamentals of proper skiing and perhaps even growing into some more advanced gear in some ways.
If your aspirations aren't that high maybe go mid 170s. If your legs are weak or you have some injury issues maybe go 170s.
I truly believe now that all mountain / freeride skis have more tip and tail rocker that basically you can add 5cm or more to what was considered skiable even 5 years ago. My 185cm Atomic Vantage 90 CTi turn on a dime, no matter what.
KustyTheKlown
Well-known member
yep, 5'11, 190 lbs, all of my skis are 180-186 cm lengths
Boxtop Willie
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 147
- Points
- 28
This may be the instructor in me speaking, but taking a lesson (from someone experienced) might be a great first step. All skiers are different; skill levels, technique and preferred terrain are different. An instructor may be able to assess technique issues and address problems. Then demo, demo, demo. Lots of different skis out there. It's the ultimate personal decision. For me (PSIA L3, 5'10" 170) I ski short. I teach on a volkl race ski at 165, daily driver is the Salomon XDR 88 at a 172. It works for me. Clemson needs to figure out what personally works best. BTW, I'm finding the XDR a pretty impressive ski, in multiple conditions.
sankaty
Member
There are plenty of good 6' skiers running 178cm skis. I'm one of them. They feel rock solid at any speed I care to drive them and float great in knee-deep snow so why go longer? I *hate* the sensation of the tails of my skis hitting a bump or tree behind me and knocking me off my line. For me, I prefer the shortest ski that feels stable. Obviously, this is a personal thing, but there is a pretty wide range that will work for people.
I'm also puzzled by the contention that weight shouldn't be a factor. At 145lbs, I will generate far less momentum that a ski has to counteract with effective edge or surface area compared to a much heavier skier. Why not go with a shorter ski that will fit in smaller places if I don't have the body mass to overdrive it under normal conditions?
I'm not saying everyone should ski short. But there is a pretty wide range of suitable lengths for good skiers depending on what kind of terrain folks are skiing, body type, skiing style, and personal preference. No need to stigmatize shorter skis for those that prefer them.
bdfreetuna
New member
Great point, especially recognizing your priorities. A couple weeks ago I was at Pico skiing some sidecountry and had to pop the 185s off in a couple gnarly sections because a jump turn was impossible due to length.
Not my favorite thing either, but I spend a lot more time skiing regular woods or trails at a good clip so the trade off doesn't work in my case. I don't like feeling squirrely when skiing at potentially dangerous speeds (if crash and slide into woods, etc).
I don't think it's a non-factor. Just there is a wide range of weighted people that can handle and drive "full length" skis. Know your style and know your limits.
Scruffy
Active member
Again, refer to my first post and all the other great advice you're getting for free, that you seem set on ignoring; respectfully, your logic is flawed.
You might have perceived from your limited experience that it is easier to turn short skis, that simply tells us that you're doing it wrong.
The wrong path for you is to continue investing in skis, short or long, without addressing the underlying issue. Take a few lessons and demo some skis before you spend anymore money on skis by shooting from the hip and guessing what you need; it will pay off for you in the long run. And we're all trying to help you here.
BTW, there are a hell of lot of skiers older than 50yo just starting skiing, infrequent skiers, and experienced skiers, and none of them, at your height or weight, are on 160cm skis, let along 147cm ( basically ski blades ). So, unless you're not telling us something about your health, or physically limitations we can't understand why you're being so recalcitrant.
Scruffy
Active member
Yeah, way too stiff for you at this point. Don't go there. I have plenty of ski friends that went that route before they had the skills to drive a race ski; they wasted too much time and money down that road.
gmcunni
Active member
i can't find detailed specs but from past experience and reputation i think Volkl skis are typically considered stiff. they have some all mountain skis in 161 length you might find interesting.
https://www.voelkl.com/en-us/products/skis/all-mountain/
https://www.voelkl.com/en-us/products/skis/all-mountain/
Too long. He said 160 dammit!
gmcunni
Active member
i saw a guy in line ahead of me today, he as about 5'10" and was skiing on 150s... maybe it is a new trend?
bdfreetuna
New member
Nope just a guy who went on a ski forum, asked a bunch of expert skiers for their opinions, and completely disregarded the consensus anyway.
gmcunni
Active member
meh... if the guy is happy skiing short skis more power to him. he's buying the gear and the lift ticket.
ski blades are a thing too.
99 cm https://www.levelninesports.com/defiance-blade-snowblades-2018
mister moose
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2007
- Messages
- 1,088
- Points
- 48
Uh, you ignored his (160cm) question, and then went on with your own expert opinion on longer skis.
sankaty
Member
Seeing as you had such a great experience with the Salomon XDR in a 147, perhaps demoing those in a longer length would be a good place to start?
I'd be wary of gong the extra stiff route if ease of turn initiation is the priority. Stiffer skis will generally require more energy for turn initiation at slower speeds, though perhaps you should demo some and see how it feels to you.
BenedictGomez
Well-known member
People being uninformed isnt a trend.
gmcunni
Active member
Saw a ski instructor with some pretty short skis. I think they were 2018 Kastle MX84 which come in a 152 size.
John9
Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2018
- Messages
- 100
- Points
- 18
There is a guy I often see at Camelback bombing the diamonds on ski blades. To me it looks insane. I bomb the same runs, on 174s, and I'm a shade under 5"9.
BenedictGomez
Well-known member
To me it would look like a trip to an orthopedic surgeon's in his future.
Similar threads
