Did I buy the wrong skis?? - Page 3

AlpineZone

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 56
  1. #21
    JimG.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Hopewell Jct., NY
    Posts
    10,298
    Quote Originally Posted by kingslug View Post
    I find 185 is a good length for everything. Shorter is easier in the tight trees though. My 191's are big powder boards but have no trouble on groomers..just not solid ice. Long skis on groomers work great..see how long race skis are.
    I've read very good things about the Head Kore line. I bought the 117's in 191 length . The 93 width got very good reviews for all conditions.
    Go slug!

    I am about to pull the string on a pair of Kore 93's along with a pair of 117's for powder days. Will probably go 180 for the 93's and 191 for the 117's.


  2. #22
    kelly001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    MA Inside 495, Outside 95.
    Posts
    228
    I just changed my daily skis for similar reasons. These days I spend a lot of time skiing with the wife and teaching less experienced skiers so a long/beefy ski was a pain on a daily basis. Last season, I went back to skiing a shorter and less stiff ski, which was a lot more fun.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Connecticut and Killington
    Posts
    12
    The beauty about the Pinnacle 95 and the entire k2 Pinnacle series is that there is a lot of front rocker, plus a small tail rocker. They ski short, which means they feel like a shorter ski. You will engage most of the ski length at high edge angles, and only a portion of the ski has pressure on it when mostly upright. I have a lot of time on the 95 and 105, older models as well as the gray 2018-2019 version. Standing upright you will pressure only about 150cm of the ski thanks to the early rise rocker.

    The more you get them on edge the more the length rewards you with stability. Since they are not stiff, the typical descriptive word is playful. With a 95mm waist and 191cm, it will do everything you want on the East Coast and would be great as a daily ski out west. And they are lighter than comparable brands.

    When running the groomers with your wife, try to focus on getting them on edge at slower speeds. You will make effortless round turns, won't intimidate her by ripping away, and you can change your turn shape at will.

    As with all rocker skis you don't want to sit back ever. Stay forward and pressure the tips in everything you do and the ski will reward you.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by beefstew177 View Post
    The past few years I've been on blizzards which were 180-- pretty snappy skis but borderline too short and beat to sh*t...and I tried out line and rossignol last year which were in the 180 range as well. The 191s are definitely the longest I've had. When I purchase (online) them I felt like I was making the right call, but when they arrived they were longer than expected. I have looked at some other 190's and they didn't feel as big. The pinnacles are relatively light so I'm hoping I still feel as nimble as before. I usually buy new then sell the old ones, but maybe I should just start a collection so I can select the right one for the day
    I don't see how 180 is too short for you, and for a strong skier I don't think +10cm is going to make that much difference. 5% longer. A skilled skier should feel the difference, but not be overcome by the difference. One thing worth pointing out is woods and bumps don't elongate for taller skiers. You're skiing a pattern laid down by the average 165 cm skier on the longest pair of skis in that model. So you're further departing the groove.

    As Da Pimp said, rockered skis ski short on the flat. However in powder (and when I say powder I'm not talking about a 4 inch freshie) the entire ski is immersed and tracking 100% of the time.

    If you recently bought the 2018 model, you must have saved $$, so not a huge loss if you don't like the ski. Consider skiing 2 pairs instead of one. Maybe find an only driven to church on Sundays pair of used Brahmas, since you know and like them.

    Looking around some liftlines it seems some guys buy their 1 pair of skis for the 8% of their ski days that are true powder days. That's a heck of a lot of compromising for the other 92%.

    As for skiing with your wife, kudos. I say you're doing it right. However, you can sometimes ski the steep fork that rejoins the Blue cruiser. You can sometimes take the double Black and meet at the lift. You can hang back and crank turns at speed to catch up if it isn't crowded. And when she's tired or cold she can go in and you can crank it for 2 or 3 runs.

    You say extensive research and trying out a few skis. This year find some demo days and do less research and more trying.

    How many days per season do you ski?
    Last edited by mister moose; Oct 9, 2019 at 7:47 PM.

  5. #25
    You'll be just fine on the 191s and they do measure long, like 193.5 I think but the rocker kills the length. I say drill'm and rip'm

    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using AlpineZone mobile app
    15-16 Killington 11-17-16

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Edd View Post

    For groomers, shorter skis are better.
    Huh? For real? I am 5'10 and wouldn't use a ski under 180cm for groomers. I actually use 180s in the glades/woods/bumps and looking for a little longer for groomers. At you're height, 191 is IDEAL. That is if you really are an expert lol..

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by da pimp View Post
    The beauty about the Pinnacle 95 and the entire k2 Pinnacle series is that there is a lot of front rocker, plus a small tail rocker. They ski short, which means they feel like a shorter ski. You will engage most of the ski length at high edge angles, and only a portion of the ski has pressure on it when mostly upright.
    Bingo! What length will affect your skiing more - tip to tail, or the amount of edge on the snow? I say the later. And the more rocker, the less edge on the snow. Which is why my rockered up powder skis are about 10cm longer than my cambered front side skis.

    Stiffness also plays a roll but I would guess the skis in question are not radically different, but I don know for sure.
    2017/18 = 37
    2016/17 = 31
    2015/16 = Depressing
    2014/15 = 28
    2013/14 = 27

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lower Hudson Valley
    Posts
    3,240
    Quote Originally Posted by Edd View Post
    Traditional wisdom dictates shorter skis for groomers and trees, longer for pow, blah, blah.
    I don’t buy that.

    The only time to go “short” is in the trees. On groomer, you can get away with skis “too long” or “too short” easily. Any “expert” should be able to easily adapt to any length of skis on the groomer.

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by slatham View Post
    Bingo! What length will affect your skiing more - tip to tail, or the amount of edge on the snow? I say the later. And the more rocker, the less edge on the snow. Which is why my rockered up powder skis are about 10cm longer than my cambered front side skis. .
    Quote Originally Posted by abc View Post
    The only time to go “short” is in the trees. On groomer, you can get away with skis “too long” or “too short” easily. Any “expert” should be able to easily adapt to any length of skis on the groomer.

    Everything is a compromise. The longer rockered ski will have more swing weight. The rockered ski generally takes higher edge angles to engage, and doesn't engage linearly, meaning the feel changes as the longer edge engages, and the longer rockered edge can feel grabby sometimes in uneven snow.

    Even if you're an expert, it isn't about making do, its about maximizing fun. Choose the right ski for the day, or if you only have one ski, buy one that suits you most of the time. For many skiers, that means an "all mountain ski", which means it does everything sorta good and does nothing really good.

    If you're skidding turns, you're not as concerned with edge hold. If you're carving turns, that by definition means zero skidding, all edge hold, so length matters. You can overpower a too-short ski.


    Each ski does have its own personality, its own unique set of trade-offs, so that's why it's better to ski it before buying it.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by abc View Post
    I don’t buy that.

    The only time to go “short” is in the trees. On groomer, you can get away with skis “too long” or “too short” easily. Any “expert” should be able to easily adapt to any length of skis on the groomer.
    What about bumps ? I am certainly not a mogul expert, but I struggle with longer skis in the troughs of big or tight bumps.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:55 PM.