• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

What is the most challenging glade trail here in the East coast?

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
586
Points
43
Then Slidebrook or Walts Woods or even Eden is where you'll find that - the other places that are steeper - well, been skiing them for years but their names tend to escape me - I'm sure others can add those that have long lines with less traversing. They just get skied out very quickly for that same reason.
 

crazy

New member
Joined
Oct 14, 2018
Messages
171
Points
0
Some of the stuff mentioned in here for being difficult kind of sound like they suck. I prefer flow for skiing trees, not that weird two turns to close out to traverse to whatever. I guess that stuff is “hard” but is it really fun?

I completely agree. Most of the terrain that I find fun is challenging, but the converse is often not true. Super tight glades where it's hard to link up turns, or steep icy glades with luge tracks can each be extremely difficult, but generally aren't fun to me. I prefer flow too. I want to be able to safely link together a bunch of turns. I've found that many of the tight, steep glades in the East are really fun right after a storm (but less challenging), but become less fun very quickly as they get tracked out (though they become more challenging).

To me at least, both skiing in the East and West presents many challenges, but the challenge out West is generally a lot more fun. It might look cooler in a TGR video to see someone making jump turns down a steep couloir, but I would argue that it's probably almost as challenging to make turns down an extremely tight, steep glade here in the East after it's been tracked out and it's icy/a luge track.
 

KustyTheKlown

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
5,365
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn
Btw I believe the out of bounds glades that you are referring off to the skiers right of the gondola at Stowe is called the kitchen wall. I wanted to ski it last year but the glades were too icy the days I was up there. It's on my list to try this season though!

Sent from my SM-T820 using AlpineZone mobile app

kitchen wall is not immediately skier's right of the gondola line. its further right. its the area between the forerunner pod and the gondola pod. you'll notice that the trail map has the yellow boundary line a bit above rim rock and cliff trail - that is the kitchen wall.

the woods to skier's right of the gondola (basically between perry merrill and cliff trail) are essentially too tight to ski. i've gone in there and had a bad time.
 

bdfreetuna

New member
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
4,300
Points
0
Location
keep the faith
Kitchen wall is not really hard though unless it's icy, it's mainly a scenic traverse and then after the traverse it's very similar to Valhalla at Jay but not as long.

There's many more difficult things at Stowe, among them Tomba's chute, which has both a steep luge track up top and an actual steep chute at the bottom which requires jump turns or at least very high level skiing. Don't suggest attempting on icy or bad snow days. The bottom chute is similar in difficulty to Pump House at Jay IMO, although not lasting as long. My photo absolutely does not do it justice.

top-ish
Tombas0.jpg
middle luge track
Tombas1.jpg
bottom chute aka Big Tomba
Tombas2.jpg
 

bdfreetuna

New member
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
4,300
Points
0
Location
keep the faith
Here's one at Cannon. Something off the summit. Not "Wicked Haaarrd" which is definitely harder and steeper but I didn't take a photo.

(and yes that line was as good as it looks)

View attachment 25471
 
Last edited:

Keelhauled

Active member
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
192
Points
28
Sometimes I think I'm a good skier, and then I see videos like that to bring me down to earth.
 

ss20

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
3,919
Points
113
Location
A minute from the Alta exit off the I-15!
Sometimes I think I'm a good skier, and then I see videos like that to bring me down to earth.

The thing with skiing I've found, compared to other sports, is the talent gap is still huuuuge at the top. A fantastic recreational mogul skier is going to get absolutely destroyed by someone who does it at the professional level. At both a technical perspective and a laymen's perspective. Most of my ski days that I'm skiing in the trees I won't get passed by anyone the whole day (in the woods). Time to time though I'll be ripping through and someone will fly by me and they seem to just be "dancing" through on skis. And kicking my ass. Not by a little...by a lot.

Bowling...for example, has a narrow gap where the best guy on the local league will average 220 and the pros average 230-240. Or get a really built, and skilled high school football player. They might be able to throw it to within a few yards of what the pros can do.
 

Smellytele

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
9,915
Points
113
Location
Right where I want to be
The thing with skiing I've found, compared to other sports, is the talent gap is still huuuuge at the top. A fantastic recreational mogul skier is going to get absolutely destroyed by someone who does it at the professional level. At both a technical perspective and a laymen's perspective. Most of my ski days that I'm skiing in the trees I won't get passed by anyone the whole day (in the woods). Time to time though I'll be ripping through and someone will fly by me and they seem to just be "dancing" through on skis. And kicking my ass. Not by a little...by a lot.

Bowling...for example, has a narrow gap where the best guy on the local league will average 220 and the pros average 230-240. Or get a really built, and skilled high school football player. They might be able to throw it to within a few yards of what the pros can do.

Maybe bowling but the skills at high school football nowhere near a pro.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

kingslug

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
6,990
Points
113
Location
Stamford Ct and Stowe
I suck at trees..which suck because now I'm a regular at Stowe. I didn't start skiing trees until around 10 years ago and that was out west. I tried to hang with a local at Stowe but he scared the hell out of me..ala The Kitchen Wall..the trees in there weren't too bad but the traverse was sick..if you fall off the side your toast. I just can't get through tight trees without picking up too much speed ..then I fell like I'm going to hit one eventually. But I keep trying as the best conditions at Stowe are usually in the trees. Just hate going in there alone.
The sickest line I have ever seen is Octopus Garden at MRG..you can see it from the chair and I think Krusty skied it the day I was wandering around there.
 
Last edited:

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
586
Points
43
its amazing how speed can be controlled by knees flexing, absorbing bump/turn and how one 'stands up' just after the pole plant.

you hit a turn and allow speed absorbtion by 'bending z knees' - the more bent, the more speed control.

and in the trees, as KtK mentioned, the flat foot/heel is important in that technique. control of speed in trees is far more important than open terrain/trails - go as fast as you like, but you better be able to change course very quickly or stop very quickly.


I swear I go much faster in trees since helmets came on the scene in the early 90's. probably the same with seatbelts . . . .

Seriously, if you're too stressed to enjoy yourself in the trees, either pick less grade or practice practice practice.

I just love stuff that pushes me and gives me some stomach willies. . ..
 
Top