• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

9% NH Lift Ticket tax - now, back to our show

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
586
Points
43
The number is getting higher everyday, and we happen to have a rightist politician in the Whitehouse. Coincidence?

Another coincidence, the federal deficit ALWAYS increase when rightist politicians are in the Whitehouse!

$9T 2009-2016. That was doubled.

and yes, he's wrong to support over income spending. He can't change it because his veto would be overridden by House.

Even the 90's was a temporary fix because we have enough fiscal conservatives in Congress for 1st time in 40 years - and it didn't last. ( and it was an accounting trick anyway - 'projected' being key word.)


Seems 9% sales tax on lift tickets are crumbs, but thats how it starts. . . drip, drip. . . .
 

JimG.

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
11,988
Points
113
Location
Hopewell Jct., NY
Money waste is most certainly a bipartisan issue.

Term limits my friends. We need them more now than ever. 2 terms max for president and it should be the same for the house and senate. I would apply the rule to any bureaucratic positions as well.

The only way to fix government today is to eliminate career politicians/bureaucrats.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,412
Points
113
Location
NJ
Money waste is most certainly a bipartisan issue.

Term limits my friends. We need them more now than ever. 2 terms max for president and it should be the same for the house and senate. I would apply the rule to any bureaucratic positions as well.

The only way to fix government today is to eliminate career politicians/bureaucrats.

Well said...completely agree.
 

MEtoVTSkier

Active member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
1,234
Points
38
Location
Aroostook County, ME
And while at it... eliminate the possibility of spouses of previous Presidents running for high offices too. 330M people in this country, we can do much better than the possibility of the same couple residing in office for 16 years. Rosalynn Carter, Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush, and Michelle Obama DO NOT need to run for President or Vice-President.
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,806
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
And while at it... eliminate the possibility of spouses of previous Presidents running for high offices too. 330M people in this country, we can do much better than the possibility of the same couple residing in office for 16 years. Rosalynn Carter, Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush, and Michelle Obama DO NOT need to run for President or Vice-President.
How about appointing your household members in various positions? ;)
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
How about appointing your household members in various positions? ;)

Are you referring to Hillary Clinton and healthcare in 1992?

I don’t see this tax passing. However, if it did pass, I don’t think it would have much impact on the number of skier days in New Hampshire. People will just absorb it as they have absorbed the rooms and meals taxes. Heck, just look at how many taxes there are when you rent a car at the airport.
 

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
586
Points
43
Are you referring to Hillary Clinton and healthcare in 1992?

I don’t see this tax passing. However, if it did pass, I don’t think it would have much impact on the number of skier days in New Hampshire. People will just absorb it as they have absorbed the rooms and meals taxes. Heck, just look at how many taxes there are when you rent a car at the airport.

Uber and Lyft have cut airport rentals by 40%.

In old days I outsmarted those airport taxes by taking a taxi 1 or 2 miles to Enterprise in SLC, have my 8 ski buds grab my bags, save 20-25% on the 11 passenger van by going to the city. Now they are trying to make it hard for people to have choices by limiting the pick up area for those services at airports.

Lobby $$ from taxi companies. . . . . are the airport customers being serviced or are the companies who spend $$ being served?


While I understand the sentiment on term limits - seems the way - we will have even LESS people voting - not a good thing. They will say ' hey, he or she has x more years. . . . '

A constitutional republic requires the people served by the government be active in its election process.

A better course - limit the entire Congress to 3 things: Average salary of their districts - pay into Social Security - limit their lobbying activity to 5 or 7 years after they leave Congress.

At a $175K a year then 80% of that for life, plus health care coverage till they ( and their spouses I think) pass away.

Where does that happen in volume in the private sector?
 

MEtoVTSkier

Active member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
1,234
Points
38
Location
Aroostook County, ME
How about appointing your household members in various positions? ;)

When you are a "current" administration, you set it up the way you want (within the boundaries of the law) Once you are "former" administration, that should eliminate you from becoming "current" again, unless you've only served 4 of your 8 year limit (whether or not there is a break between the 2 4year stints. 4 years served by a former admin should limit either spouse to only 4 more years. 8 by either eliminates any possibility of the other.
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,806
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
Let me understand, you’re saying it’s ok to appoint your family to position while in the Whitehouse? If so, Hillary Clinton was appointed by the then “current” administration. You think it’s fine because it’s “set it up the way you want”?
 

JimG.

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
11,988
Points
113
Location
Hopewell Jct., NY
And while at it... eliminate the possibility of spouses of previous Presidents running for high offices too. 330M people in this country, we can do much better than the possibility of the same couple residing in office for 16 years. Rosalynn Carter, Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush, and Michelle Obama DO NOT need to run for President or Vice-President.

Got busy finishing up winterizing but I thought of the family limitation as I was outside working.

Totally agree, 2 terms per family as a rule.

We don't need any former president's kids, brothers, sisters, cousins or in-laws in office either.
 
Last edited:

mister moose

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
1,086
Points
48
To me, tax policy should be both consistent and competitive. Lift tickets shouldn't be taxed any differently than other services in the state. And the State should be mindful of the total tax burden for a ski area (or any business) relative to bordering states - including property taxes, workman's comp, etc. Those vary quite a bit state to state.

Nationally I also like the idea of term limits, but with a twist. Don't prohibit a wildly popular senator from multiple terms, ie do not outlaw competence - but raise the performance standard. So the first two terms you need 50% +1 of the vote to win. On the third term, 55% is required. 4th term, 60%. 5th term, 65%.

Patrick Leahy, Senator from VT, has been in office since 1975, and is the most senor Senator. In 2022 if he runs again for a 7th term, he would need 75% of the vote to hold his seat.

While the President has the bully pulpit and can veto a bill, it is Congress that sets the budget and makes appropriations. The deficit is really Congress's fault. Congress can't even pass a budget; we now live on continuing resolutions, like a 12 year old that can't make his allowance last.
 

JimG.

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
11,988
Points
113
Location
Hopewell Jct., NY
To me, tax policy should be both consistent and competitive. Lift tickets shouldn't be taxed any differently than other services in the state. And the State should be mindful of the total tax burden for a ski area (or any business) relative to bordering states - including property taxes, workman's comp, etc. Those vary quite a bit state to state.

Nationally I also like the idea of term limits, but with a twist. Don't prohibit a wildly popular senator from multiple terms, ie do not outlaw competence - but raise the performance standard. So the first two terms you need 50% +1 of the vote to win. On the third term, 55% is required. 4th term, 60%. 5th term, 65%.

Patrick Leahy, Senator from VT, has been in office since 1975, and is the most senor Senator. In 2022 if he runs again for a 7th term, he would need 75% of the vote to hold his seat.

While the President has the bully pulpit and can veto a bill, it is Congress that sets the budget and makes appropriations. The deficit is really Congress's fault. Congress can't even pass a budget; we now live on continuing resolutions, like a 12 year old that can't make his allowance last.

I like that type of variation.

I agree we don't want to outlaw competence; but since there is no competence I can see anywhere right now I didn't think of it.
 

KustyTheKlown

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
5,365
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn
While it’s nice in theory to set the hypothetical high bar for leahy, losing at 74%-26% means Vermont would wind up with a senator with no popular mandate whatsoever. maybe you can set a higher bar for a primary, but in a general this would result in very unrepresentative people in office
 

Dickc

Active member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
567
Points
43
Location
Northeast Mass
While it’s nice in theory to set the hypothetical high bar for leahy, losing at 74%-26% means Vermont would wind up with a senator with no popular mandate whatsoever. maybe you can set a higher bar for a primary, but in a general this would result in very unrepresentative people in office
The fix for Kusty's problem is to have a new candidate slate WITHOUT the incumbent and re-run the election. Should they fail to get the required percent in a primary, it would be fairly easy and quick to hold a second primary to garner the required replacement.

I like many of the ideas that this thread has come up with, and do agree that Congress has done a terrible job with budgets (both parties).
 

icecoast1

Active member
Joined
Mar 27, 2018
Messages
757
Points
43
Money waste is most certainly a bipartisan issue.

Term limits my friends. We need them more now than ever. 2 terms max for president and it should be the same for the house and senate. I would apply the rule to any bureaucratic positions as well.

The only way to fix government today is to eliminate career politicians/bureaucrats.


Completely agree but the same career politicians would have to vote for this and will never happen because they will never vote to give up power or status.
 

Killingtime

Active member
Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
393
Points
28
Location
Long Island, NY
Quick update: Epic resorts are exempt. They are not sure about Ikon, Indy. I don't think this will pass anyway. Doesn't Sununu own Waterville Valley?

https://www.newenglandskiindustry.com/viewstory.php?storyid=808

"Five Southern New Hampshire Democrat lawmakers have sponsored legislation which would levy a 9% tax on ski lift tickets. HB 1652-FN-A would use the tax revenue to fund scholarships for department of corrections inmates, with remaining revenue going to a general scholarship fund.

New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu, former general manager of Waterville Valley, has pledged to veto the bill if it reaches his desk.


Sponspored by Jennie Gomarlo (D-Swanzey), Lee Oxenham (D-Plainfield), Joe Schapiro (D-Keene), Michelle St. John (D-Hollis), and Craig Thompson (D-Harrisville), the bill would apply to one- to three-day lift tickets for buyers above the age of 18 starting with the 2020-21 ski season.

With skier visits skewing toward multi-area season pass products, independent ski areas would see a larger impact from the tax.

The tax would not apply to the Vail Resorts Epic Pass, the largest selling season pass product in the world. Vail Resorts operates four New Hampshire ski areas: Attitash, Crotched, Mt. Sunapee, and Wildcat.

It is not clear how the Department of Revenue Administration would handle multi-area products such as the Ikon Pass and Indy Pass, in which skiers pay an out-of-state entity that then compensates participating New Hampshire areas based upon their redeemed day tickets.

Other parts of the bill include a requirement for ski areas to obtain a license to sell lift tickets, as well as a clause allowing state liquor stores to sell lift tickets."
 

Edd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
6,537
Points
113
Location
Newmarket, NH
I’m not reading that as Epic resorts are exempt. It’s saying the Epic Pass itself is exempt. Only taxing lift tickets 1 to 3 days long.


Sent from my iPad using AlpineZone
 
Top