• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Creditors Force Liftopia into Bankruptcy

JimG.

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
11,989
Points
113
Location
Hopewell Jct., NY
Eastern powder baby, didn’t think of this angle, but you could be right, liftopia potentially going belly up hurts a lot of small ski areas since liftopia did a lot of the online work for these small ski areas, it’s a kick to the gut for them.

Exactly why I said prices will be going up...step 2 of the megapass playbook is to drive the small guys out of business.
 

Cobbold

Active member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Messages
424
Points
28
Exactly why I said prices will be going up...step 2 of the megapass playbook is to drive the small guys out of business.

Wonder if this helps the Indy pass group, by allowing them to take over the web/online presence of the independents, the side benefit is they go onto the Indy pass.

My guess in a few years just about everybody will be on some kind of super pass, whether it’s, epic, ikon, mountain collective, indypass and future passes
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,340
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Wonder if this helps the Indy pass group, by allowing them to take over the web/online presence of the independents, the side benefit is they go onto the Indy pass.

My guess in a few years just about everybody will be on some kind of super pass, whether it’s, epic, ikon, mountain collective, indypass and future passes

Again, Liftopia is staying in business. They’re planning on reorganization. It’s just the creditors want their money.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,130
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
EPIC & IKON are primarily to blame for the cost of skiing increasing for the masses. Those here who disagree with this (repeatedly) do so because they are not, "the masses", but fervent SPH skiers, and can't separate their personal experience from that of the average skier as defined by NSAA data.
 

EPB

Active member
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
966
Points
28
Again, Liftopia is staying in business. They’re planning on reorganization. It’s just the creditors want their money.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
I believe TB is a lawyer (could be wrong), if so, I'll defer to him on the finer points.

That said, this is Chapter 11 which means Liftopia's management will continue to operate the business during bankruptcy. That said, operations become more challenging as the court appointed trustee now oversees business dealings and management's focus shifts from being focused on ownership's best interest exclusively to the best interest of all parties. In short, they're under a different level of scrutiny now. Also bear in mind that vendors, etc. are now less likely to want to do business with Liftopia now that they are in bankruptcy (perceived higher likelihood of not being paid in full for services rendered).

While it's impossible to know from Aspen's perspective, the case could later switch to Chaper 7 (liquidation) if no better alternative is found. As I recall, another party cannot force a debtor directly into Chapter 7. It is somewhat unlikely creditors think this goes full liquidation assuming Liftopia's business model makes sense in a non-COVID environment.

Forcing another party into bankruptcy is generally considered an aggressive move, so the fact that Aspen and others (who certainly compete with Liftopia) are doing this in the middle of a liquidity crunch is suspicious at best. I'm sure they would all want their money they feel is owed to them, but this is unlikely to be a quick or cheap endeavor (so "I need my money from liftopia so I can turn and and pay my creditors next month" is an unlikely motivation). Hence why I think this could be strategic.

Sent from my VS988 using AlpineZone mobile app
 

Cobbold

Active member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Messages
424
Points
28
I believe TB is a lawyer (could be wrong), if so, I'll defer to him on the finer points.

That said, this is Chapter 11 which means Liftopia's management will continue to operate the business during bankruptcy. That said, operations become more challenging as the court appointed trustee now oversees business dealings and management's focus shifts from being focused on ownership's best interest exclusively to the best interest of all parties. In short, they're under a different level of scrutiny now. Also bear in mind that vendors, etc. are now less likely to want to do business with Liftopia now that they are in bankruptcy (perceived higher likelihood of not being paid in full for services rendered).

While it's impossible to know from Aspen's perspective, the case could later switch to Chaper 7 (liquidation) if no better alternative is found. As I recall, another party cannot force a debtor directly into Chapter 7. It is somewhat unlikely creditors think this goes full liquidation assuming Liftopia's business model makes sense in a non-COVID environment.

Forcing another party into bankruptcy is generally considered an aggressive move, so the fact that Aspen and others (who certainly compete with Liftopia) are doing this in the middle of a liquidity crunch is suspicious at best. I'm sure they would all want their money they feel is owed to them, but this is unlikely to be a quick or cheap endeavor (so "I need my money from liftopia so I can turn and and pay my creditors next month" is an unlikely motivation). Hence why I think this could be strategic.

Sent from my VS988 using AlpineZone mobile app


Eastern powder baby,

I think you are spot on, also think this is a tremendous opportunity for the Indy pass people as well as Indy pass holders, time will tell, originally I thought it was liquidity issue at alterra but your analysis is the correct one. Depending on how this virus thing goes, all four of the big four may face liquidty problems this winter/spring, not sure about powder Corp, but the other three have large loans out.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,416
Points
113
Location
NJ
Eastern powder baby,

I think you are spot on, also think this is a tremendous opportunity for the Indy pass people as well as Indy pass holders, time will tell, originally I thought it was liquidity issue at alterra but your analysis is the correct one. Depending on how this virus thing goes, all four of the big four may face liquidty problems this winter/spring, not sure about powder Corp, but the other three have large loans out.

Another reason an Alterra liquidity issue doesn't make much sense is that they're only owed 64K per the filing. For a small company/ski area that might be a lot of money, but for one of Alterra's size I can't see that being a make or break type of deal. That's less than 100 Ikon passes that they need to sell to generate that much money. Aspen on the other hand is owed 2.4M. That's a sizeable chunk of money to be owed. Even A-Basin is owed 176K.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,340
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Another reason an Alterra liquidity issue doesn't make much sense is that they're only owed 64K per the filing. For a small company/ski area that might be a lot of money, but for one of Alterra's size I can't see that being a make or break type of deal. That's less than 100 Ikon passes that they need to sell to generate that much money. Aspen on the other hand is owed 2.4M. That's a sizeable chunk of money to be owed. Even A-Basin is owed 176K.

I wonder if these are Mountain Collective Resorts who never got their $$$ back.
 

Smellytele

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
9,915
Points
113
Location
Right where I want to be
If they are owed money then they were working together they weren’t competitive. Why would they try to put them out of business if they went into the agreement knowing Liftopia would be selling the tickets at a discount?


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

EPB

Active member
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
966
Points
28
If they are owed money then they were working together they weren’t competitive. Why would they try to put them out of business if they went into the agreement knowing Liftopia would be selling the tickets at a discount?


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
I get the spirit of this, and I actually think the creditors will clutch their pearls if accused of being sharks in the water.

That said, there are countless examples of being customer and competitor at the same time. The simplest example I can think of this are grocers that carry brand names and private label simultaneously. My Wegmans sells Wegmans cheese and Cabot next to another. They are a customer AND competitor with Cabot.

Sent from my VS988 using AlpineZone mobile app
 

ScottySkis

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
12,294
Points
48
Location
Middletown NY
I get the spirit of this, and I actually think the creditors will clutch their pearls if accused of being sharks in the water.

That said, there are countless examples of being customer and competitor at the same time. The simplest example I can think of this are grocers that carry brand names and private label simultaneously. My Wegmans sells Wegmans cheese and Cabot next to another. They are a customer AND competitor with Cabot.

Sent from my VS988 using AlpineZone mobile app

Sometimes those brand name make the generic cheaper food items
 

EPB

Active member
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
966
Points
28
Sometimes those brand name make the generic cheaper food items
100%. Makes the customer-supplier relationship even more fluid in this case. Love the Platty updates, BTW.

That said Aspen/Alterra is without question a client of Liftopia. I wouldn't be surprised if Liftopia's presence is more of a hindrance to Aspen/Alterra at this point though.

Sent from my VS988 using AlpineZone mobile app
 

dblskifanatic

Active member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
767
Points
43
EPIC & IKON are primarily to blame for the cost of skiing increasing for the masses. Those here who disagree with this (repeatedly) do so because they are not, "the masses", but fervent SPH skiers, and can't separate their personal experience from that of the average skier as defined by NSAA data.

I would like to understand your perspective on this! My cost per day skiing has never been lower than it has been since I have skied Epic. And the season passes at many Colorado ski areas are very reasonable - cheaper than Pats Peak or Magic and other independents. Not doubting , just curious.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

Killingtime

Active member
Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
393
Points
28
Location
Long Island, NY
I would like to understand your perspective on this! My cost per day skiing has never been lower than it has been since I have skied Epic. And the season passes at many Colorado ski areas are very reasonable - cheaper than Pats Peak or Magic and other independents. Not doubting , just curious.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone

He's probably talking about the price of a walk-up day pass for the person who skis a few times per year, which has been on a steady upward trajectory. I'm not sure how much of that can be attributed to mega passes versus the increasing cost of operating a ski resort such as insurance, taxes, energy and labor. Seems that most places are pushing $100 now for a day pass. It pays to do some research for discounted tickets but believe it or not some people are just not aware that deals are out there especially if they are new to the sport.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,130
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
He's probably talking about the price of a walk-up day pass for the person who skis a few times per year, which has been on a steady upward trajectory.

Correct. I thought I made it clear, but upon
reading my post again I have no idea why i assumed everyone would be familiar with the gleanings of NSAA data.
 

fbrissette

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
1,672
Points
48
Location
Montreal/Jay Peak
He's probably talking about the price of a walk-up day pass for the person who skis a few times per year, which has been on a steady upward trajectory. I'm not sure how much of that can be attributed to mega passes versus the increasing cost of operating a ski resort such as insurance, taxes, energy and labor. Seems that most places are pushing $100 now for a day pass. It pays to do some research for discounted tickets but believe it or not some people are just not aware that deals are out there especially if they are new to the sport.


The ski industry is clearly steering customers toward seasons passes. Not that long ago, you needed to ski 20 to 25 days for a season pass to be worth it. This number of days has steadily decreased to around 8-10 days for most season passes since walk up day passes have increased so dramatically. Nowadays you need to have a lot more money or be a good bargain hunter if you want to ski without a season pass (or mega pass such as Ikon or Epic).
 

Killingtime

Active member
Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
393
Points
28
Location
Long Island, NY
Correct. I thought I made it clear, but upon
reading my post again I have no idea why i assumed everyone would be familiar with the gleanings of NSAA data.

No problem BG. I have a buddy who put together a last minute 4 day trip to Killington last year with his wife and three kids. He is a two to three times a year skier who will never buy a pass. No discounted lift tickets. With lodging, lift tickets, food and misc expenses he spent over $3,000 to ski in crowded, crappy conditions. Not the ski resorts fault but yeah, its expensive for people who haven figured out how to shave a few dollars off here and there.
 

ss20

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
3,919
Points
113
Location
A minute from the Alta exit off the I-15!
No problem BG. I have a buddy who put together a last minute 4 day trip to Killington last year with his wife and three kids. He is a two to three times a year skier who will never buy a pass. No discounted lift tickets. With lodging, lift tickets, food and misc expenses he spent over $3,000 to ski in crowded, crappy conditions. Not the ski resorts fault but yeah, its expensive for people who haven figured out how to shave a few dollars off here and there.

....and Killington has become one of the least expensive major-players in Vermont...

That still means buying a lift ticket for a Saturday two weeks away will cost you $90-100. I think only Jay is more reasonable than that for large resorts in Vermont. Okemo, Mount Snow, Sugarbush, Stowe will all be asking for over $100. Oddly enough now I believe Stratton's online advance rate is below that of the majority.
 

Cobbold

Active member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Messages
424
Points
28
No problem BG. I have a buddy who put together a last minute 4 day trip to Killington last year with his wife and three kids. He is a two to three times a year skier who will never buy a pass. No discounted lift tickets. With lodging, lift tickets, food and misc expenses he spent over $3,000 to ski in crowded, crappy conditions. Not the ski resorts fault but yeah, its expensive for people who haven figured out how to shave a few dollars off here and there.

I love guys like that, that’s how major ski areas can afford to upgrade their snowmaking, groomers, put high speed six packs in, yes yes I love people like them.
 

Cobbold

Active member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Messages
424
Points
28
According to Doug fish of the Indy pass, non pass holders on average ski 4 days a year, if Bretton woods and or Waterville valley join the Indy pass, for most people 2 days at cannon and Bretton woods or Waterville valley makes for a pretty inexpensive Trip to New Hampshire, if jay Peak joins, 2 days at jay and two at Bolton valley is pretty decent too, in my opinion, my opinion and twenty bucks gets you a small coffee at Starbucks, lol
 
Top