• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

The "Sugarbush Thread"

rtjcbrown

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
160
Points
16
Doesn't look like it was going to be much, based on this article.
attachment.php

Thank you!
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,764
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
Here is the last of it. I did read a couple of different stories for the development of this area. Some talked a little more about trails and all had stated that a base area was out of the question. Unknown-1.jpg
 
Last edited:

benski

Active member
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
1,114
Points
36
Location
Binghamton NY
I looked up the plans for slide brook a while ago and saw an earlier description which said there would be many more lifts. I guess they can up with a big plan then scaled it down a few times until they ended up with the one lift they have now.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

DoublePlanker

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
306
Points
18
Location
Bedford, NH
I remember the old ski or skiing article in the 1980's I think where the plan was laid out to develop all of slide brook. I think the claim was largest ski area in N. America. There were many, many lifts.
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,702
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
Slide Brook died from environmental groups. It was tagged as Black Bear habitat and is now off limits to development. Slidebrook Express is the way it is for multi reasons. Otten wanted to link Lincoln and Ellen over the top (one reason Castlerock was originally proposed to go HSQ and snowmaking, because the summit link would have been from there). That was killed due to sight lines from the valley. So they went to where slide Brook currently is. They looked at a gondola due to the length but tower heights would be too great with cabins and again be seen too much from the valley. So they went with the HSQ, as the height clearance was less an no reflective cabins or windows to cut down on visibility from valley. There you have it, lots of hurdles to jump in ski resort improvements.
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,626
Points
63
Looks like Vermont hasn't changed much in 30 years....


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone

So, in retrospect, 30 years later, do you think leaving slidebrook undeveloped was a good or bad thing?
IMHO, it is better that it was left untouched. But thats just me, who takes his kids backcountry skiing/biking when they've never been to disneyland.
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,626
Points
63
Looks like Vermont hasn't changed much in 30 years....


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone

So, in retrospect, 30 years later, do you think leaving slidebrook undeveloped was a good or bad thing?
IMHO, it is better that it was left untouched. But thats just me, who takes his kids backcountry skiing/biking when they've never been to disneyland.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,338
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
So, in retrospect, 30 years later, do you think leaving slidebrook undeveloped was a good or bad thing?
IMHO, it is better that it was left untouched. But thats just me, who takes his kids backcountry skiing/biking when they've never been to disneyland.

I think it is fine as it is. I was just commenting on the protests. I can't imagine what a "summit-to-summit" lift would look like. And if Win and Company are having issues keeping the SBX running due to costs, can you imagine the cost of a gondola?
 

DoublePlanker

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
306
Points
18
Location
Bedford, NH
Probably better untouched. There seems to be plenty of skiing around for the New England market. Developing slide brook would probably just take market share away from other ski areas causing them to close. It seems so hard for mountains to be sustainable such as Saddleback, Burke, Sugarloaf, Tenney, etc. I can't fathom who is going to dump $$$ into Balsams.
 

DoublePlanker

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
306
Points
18
Location
Bedford, NH
I was referring earlier to what I think was a 1982 plan for slide brook. This plan was much larger than anything conceived by Les Otten. And it predates all the environmental blockages as it won early approval. However, the outcry from the community may have spurned tougher environmental hurdles for the industry. Can't seem to find anything else about it. I'm pretty sure it was in Ski or Skiing magazine around that time.
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,626
Points
63
I think it is fine as it is. I was just commenting on the protests. I can't imagine what a "summit-to-summit" lift would look like. And if Win and Company are having issues keeping the SBX running due to costs, can you imagine the cost of a gondola?

Thats what I thought you would say. guess the tree huggers arent wrong all the time.

They actually ran the SBX more last season. It ran everyday although they pushed the start time back to 10am. With so many people skiing slidebrook and taking the shuttle on german flats to mt ellen, there really isnt much traffic on the SBX. It is invariably ski on and the only time it runs near capacity is at 3pm when people want to get back to the mtn they started from before the lift shuts down.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,415
Points
113
Location
NJ
So, in retrospect, 30 years later, do you think leaving slidebrook undeveloped was a good or bad thing?
IMHO, it is better that it was left untouched. But thats just me, who takes his kids backcountry skiing/biking when they've never been to disneyland.

I vote good that Slidebrook was left virtually untouched.

Although I'm still in favor of developing something else at ME at some point in the future :razz: (I think upper Inverness would be my vote there).
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,415
Points
113
Location
NJ
And if Win and Company are having issues keeping the SBX running due to costs, can you imagine the cost of a gondola?

What makes you say they are having issues keeping SBX running? It ran both weekends and midweek the past 3 seasons as long as wind, temps, and snow cover were adequate.
 

steamboat1

New member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
6,613
Points
0
Location
Brooklyn,NY/Pittsford,VT.
If operating costs are an issue with SBX I think they shouldn't run it non holiday weekdays. It's easy enough to use the regular shuttle service that runs between the two areas. Why have the expense of running the chair & the expense of running the shuttle when one will satisfy the demand for the service. I was quite surprised to see SBX running one weekday I skied there last April (maybe late March) when both mountains were empty. In fact I had a problem that day getting back to Lincoln because the SBX was put on wind hold in the afternoon & didn't run again that day. Shuttle service had already been discontinued for the season. Guest Services was scrambling at Mt. Ellen to find a way to get people back to Lincoln. I got lucky & found a guy in the parking lot with a pick up truck that was heading back to Lincoln & was willing to give me a ride. I don't know the outcome for the other 20 or so people I saw at Ellen that were stuck.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,338
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
What makes you say they are having issues keeping SBX running? It ran both weekends and midweek the past 3 seasons as long as wind, temps, and snow cover were adequate.

When I was a passholder, from 2007-2011, they made a point of saying that "due to cost" it would only run weekends and holidays. Sounds like they have reversed that.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,415
Points
113
Location
NJ
When I was a passholder, from 2007-2011, they made a point of saying that "due to cost" it would only run weekends and holidays. Sounds like they have reversed that.

Yea, the 2011-2012 season was the first year I was a passholder and then they were only doing the weekends/holidays thing with Slide Brook. The 2012-2013 season was when they switched to running it whenever conditions permit. Maybe it isn't entirely needed, but I personally like that they run it all the time now.
 
Top