Impressed by this Ski! Is it Fat or Mid Fat??

[skidmarks]

2012/2013/2014 Dynastar Cham 97

118-133-97-113-94 mm Size tested 178cm

Tested the new Dynastar Cham 97 at Stowe this past Monday March 19th at Stowe VT.
It made skiing the wet manky snow fun! You know it's going to rock in powder too.

 

[Nick]

Cool video, reggae mon

 

[Trekchick]

Everyone who tested that ski on the EpicSki Gathering Demo day at Mt Rose loved it. Even those who felt that they were going too long on the test length.

Pretty nice ski!

 

[Hawkshot99]

Demoed those things on a spring day a few weeks ago, and they sucked! Every Dynastar I skied that day was horrible. I know it was not the conditions, as we enjoyed almost every Volkl that day.

 

[WWF-VT]

The key question that needs to be answered - is Highway Star impressed by this ski?

 

[andyzee]

In this case, I would say phat.

 

[ski_resort_observer]

The key question that needs to be answered - is Highway Star impressed by this ski?

It wasn't the ski HS was not impressed by but the people who skied on fat skis and I too am waiting for his commentary.

 

[skidmarks]

Demoed those things on a spring day a few weeks ago, and they sucked! Every Dynastar I skied that day was horrible. I know it was not the conditions, as we enjoyed almost every Volkl that day.

Was it bad weed???