ChileMass
Active member
Skiing Hero or Future Darwin Award winner??
http://www.helenair.com/articles/2006/01/29/national/a07012906_02.txt
http://www.helenair.com/articles/2006/01/29/national/a07012906_02.txt
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
montageskier said:That was actually broken a month or so after this happened.
riverc0il said:it is a logical fallacy to believe that something is safe just because one person tried it and didn't die. i prefer to look at this guy's survival as a fluke. at the least, it is amazing the guy did not have any breaks or other serious physical damage. i think the real danger is people don't realize just how dangerous this is, not the other way around.
ChileMass said:It's a miracle, not a result of planning, that he survived the 245 foot drop......even in "perfect" conditions, there's no way he survives that jump twice......
it's pretty raw up here. occasional sprinkles with poor visibility. generally that would indicate even worse conditions in tucks with a wet TRT to boot. not my thing. i'll wait for a nice day. it's not like i have much to look forward to, it is desperation only at this point. besides, i need to get my stuff together for a short trip these next few days to the windy city.awf170 said:Why aren't you out skiing?
awf170 said:He went of a 220 ft. drop before and landed on a rock and was perfectly fine.
shwilly said:Remove the "not dying" requirement, and people have fallen thousands of feet.
YardSaleDad said:Some even lived, but they were not wearing skis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_fall#People_surviving_free_fall
JimG. said:Oddly appropriate that the hang glider amongst us has these facts close at hand.