Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
If air is the limiting factor of your snow making plant, you can run more guns at once. I do not know if these guns produce more acre feet of snow with x gallons of water.Air is the more expensive component of snow making.
At some point with modern low E guns, water can almost become the limiting agent too. If you've got a gun that uses 1/4th the air that a "traditional gun" uses, then obviously one can run more guns, as long as they can pump enough water to supply all that excess air those low E guns. Not so much an issue in warmer, more humid conditions, but if you get some cold, dry air with a nice low wet bulb when hardly any air is needed, then if you've got a system that can pump say 10,000 gallons of water a minute, that could easily be the limiting factor in the snowmaking equation. The reality is that even more efficient snowmaking is still expensive, and with the increases in modern technology, the fine folks that make and groom the snow, and the folks that keep track of how much it costs to make and groom the snow have a much better handle on both how much snow they'll typically need to meet their operations target and also when it's the most efficient time to make snow. This is one of the reasons why in a typical year nowadays, you'll see many ski areas "finish" making snow for the season at an earlier and earlier date than in years past, and very often having made more acre feet of snow in less time because they simply have better "tools" and a better grasp of the cost/efficiency ratio than ever before. Win-win situation for sure
You're such a snow-making nerd. We need to get together for beers soon. This off-season is very anti-social!
FYI - These are the snowguns installed on Outer Limits at Killington last year. You know, the ones that have exceptionally poor performance in wind, and no throw.
Good luck with that, these things are basicly complete garbage.
I kind of had this basic thought too.
If they're to be installed mainly on trails that are say 50 - 75 feet wide, no problems with the limited throw they have shown to have. If you're talking a trail that 150+ feet wide, then you're going to end up spending a bunch more in diesel (even the Loaf's promoted Bio Diesel) to push that snow across the trail to get good edge to edge coverage.
In the world of air/water guns, this seems to be one of the major differences aside from the amount of air used, how close the whale of snow produced is to the gun in a low e gun vs. an "old school air hog" gun
The end product though is still pretty darn good
FYI - These are the snowguns installed on Outer Limits at Killington last year. You know, the ones that have exceptionally poor performance in wind, and no throw.
Good luck with that, these things are basicly complete garbage.
FYI - These are the snowguns installed on Outer Limits at Killington last year. You know, the ones that have exceptionally poor performance in wind, and no throw.
Good luck with that, these things are basicly complete garbage.
Those "garbage" snow guns enabled Loon to open terrain as quick as anyone at the start of last season. Those "garbage" snow guns also enabled Loon to have vastly more open terrain than Killington at the end of the season.
I'm not suggesting they're great; truthfully I know jack shit about snowmaking technology. However, with what Loon put out last season, it's pretty clear that these kind of guns can be employed very effectively.
I am pretty sure they are real. I saw them in action and they do have absolutely zero through. The snow quality was very nice, but it doesn't make it very far from the gun.