• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Wasatch Update: November 2025

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
13,051
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Snowbasin has a similar altitude like DV and has been boilerplate. I like it, it keeps the crowds down......What do western skiers and the Titanic have in common? ....
They both go down when they hit ice.

Accurate. People from here have no idea.

So many times I'll hear the native born say, "it's terrible", and I'm thinking, this would actually be pretty decent in Vermont. LOL
 

KBL Ed

New member
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
20
Points
3
Who does everyone use for forecasts? There is a guy for N.E., Snowology, who does a really good job. Any reliable people who actually know the mountains, and is not forecasting just for "Park City" or whatever?
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
34,230
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Who does everyone use for forecasts? There is a guy for N.E., Snowology, who does a really good job. Any reliable people who actually know the mountains, and is not forecasting just for "Park City" or whatever?
Personally, I just read the NWS/NOAA forecasts. This product is specifically for the Cottonwoods:


Click "Salt Lake Area" if you do not see a forecast for the Cottonwoods.

I also read this blog, but Jim has not been posting as often:


Finally, some folks read Evan's site, but most of the information is behind a paywall:


And then some folks go for the alternative forecast, which is Powder Buoy. He has been striking out though this season and his site is kind of messy. I think he usually posts on social media.

 

KBL Ed

New member
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
20
Points
3
Snowology: If by "hack" you mean he constantly shills his paywalled site, you are absolutely correct. But his forecasts have been on point.

Yeah, I used to like OpenSnow when less of it was behind a paywall.

Good idea to click on a point at elevation at NWS, though that still won't have the human interpretation. I'll look and see if they have something more general for the Park City areas. I'll check the other ones, too. Thanks.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
13,051
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
What’d you get? I want new pow boards but lacking inspiration with choosing.

I got a the fattest Bacons (122 underfoot) that Line makes. My in-season skis are 106 underfoot (Soul 7), but when we get a really great dump it's just not enough. It's not a huge deal, but after living out here the last 2 winters I did wish I had something fat for those 12"+, 15"+, 20"+ days and cycles, but since I ski Park City and not Alta/Bird, we get far fewer 12"+ days, so I didnt want to spend a lot and so was looking used. Visited the places outside the Cottonwoods figuring I'd find more used powder skis there than maybe anywhere on the planet, and I was right, but they still wanted like $450 - $650 even well-used. Then I found these in SLC on clearance at EVO as the only 2 pairs from prior year they had on clearance for $320, and a different shop across the street I got a straggler set of bindings for $99. So for $450 new total I was fine with it given the skis alone should be $900 or so.

Then the S/Force pictured I just go too because my new boots I got last year don't fit my rock skis. Went into the local shop we go to and the guy gave me 3 or 4 narrow options underfoot and told me to take any one I want for $150. SOLD! They're actually in great shape for being 4 year old rentals, which makes me think most people don't want to rent 80 underfoot rentals.

1765870545315.png
 
Last edited:
Top