mondeo
New member
I'm guessing it was actually fairly smart. The big thing is being able to market opening Nov. 2, closing May 2. A full (minus 10 days after Nov. 2) 6 month season, and into May. People may gripe about the Sunday opening/Saturday closing, but it probably isn't going to have any real impact on ticket sales. So the question is would being open one more day offset the additional costs of having an additional payroll period?I didn't like this either. It sent the wrong message to the skiers (customer). The issue was that the payroll week started and ended on a Saturday, and that having folks work on a Sunday would screw it up. Now in the Pres Smith days, they'd figure something out to get around that. Instead, the unintended message that was sent was, "well, our internal needs are more important than opening and delivering the product to the consumer."
What I want to know is did they take the month off in May as an opportunity to rejigger their payroll schedule? It seems pretty stupid to me to have a seasonal business that operates mostly on the weekends have their payroll schedule set up that way. New business week starts Thursday or something like that.