Then how in the world did it worm its way into your argument?
I know I promised to bow out of my role as amateur PI attorney, but this was just too much to pass up. Let's rehearse. I make some claim about how your resort might be found to have breached a duty to some skier it was teaching. Some poster responds with a tired old meme of Picard expressing what the poster obviously intended to be interpreted as exasperation at my claim. I respond by interpreting it is acknowledgement on the part of Picard that my argument is incontrovertable and your resort will be liable for significant damages. Since your resort is probably not the premier destination for foreign celebrities, the only other reason I could think of for why Picard might care is that the verdict would put in jeopardy something you could offer him that premier resorts could not. How anyone could interpret this (feeble perhaps) attempt at a joke as an argument for the claim that your resort breached a duty to that child? Is your economic development program such a sore spot for the JP PR and marketing departments that it impairs your sense of humor? I realize your resort is located in one of the more insular and xenophobic parts of this country, but I would have thought that the majorty of your target demographic wouldn't care, particularly when many of them are Canadian. Perhaps you should leave the resort propaganda to the PR department.