• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Receiver Announces that Burke has a Stalking Horse Bid and Deal will Close by End of 2024

B-Eastski

New member
Joined
Dec 10, 2024
Messages
25
Points
3
Again, what upgrades are needed? HSQ’s cover all the terrain. The Sherburne likely needs a rebuild but lifts are not really an issue. They have more capacity than currently needed.
Okay a rebuild is probably what is needed which would be for two HSQs 4-8 million alone. Stratton is rebuilding American Express costing 4 million. 1 lift.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,513
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Wonder what the typical lifespan is on a rebuild. I think of the Wildcat HSQ as it's nearing 30 years old. A full replacement probably would cost what? $10M? If you could get another 20 years for a $4M rebuild, that probably makes sense for a mid sized area.
 

SkiingInABlueDream

Active member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
879
Points
43
Location
the woods of greater-Waltham
Okay a rebuild is probably what is needed which would be for two HSQs 4-8 million alone. Stratton is rebuilding American Express costing 4 million. 1 lift.
Where are you getting TWO HSQs needing rebuild at Burke?
Edit. My point being, one of those chairs is fairly new still and doesn't need rebuild
 

Big Wave Dave

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Messages
135
Points
18
From the NEK had an easy and inexpensive proposal: shorten the Willoughby Quad and have it end right below Upper Fox's Folly so that intermediates can ski the lower blues. But the poor Willoughby is dying a slow and painful death. :(
That’s a great idea. Those trails are underutilized as is.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,476
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
That’s a great idea. Those trails are underutilized as is.
I can't take credit. It was From the NEK's idea.

Are you going to the "Community Forum" tomorrow night to hear a former bidder complain about how unfair it is that they are not in the running for the ski resort? I think that the community has dodged a bullet without realizing it quite yet.

My sources confirm that the purchaser is who folks suspected. The family name, when added to the word 'Cracker', is a favorite sweet treat used with S'mores.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,756
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
I dont want to engage in a public war of words, which is why in a completely unsolicited, voluntary, and unnecessary fashion I'm releasing a letter to the press.
 

jimmywilson69

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
3,483
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg, PA
I see no issue with the statement, but also see your point. The whole receiver thing is weird. It sounds like he has a better and higher offer which his job.

What a bizarre saga from the get go...
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,513
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I can't take credit. It was From the NEK's idea.

Are you going to the "Community Forum" tomorrow night to hear a former bidder complain about how unfair it is that they are not in the running for the ski resort? I think that the community has dodged a bullet without realizing it quite yet.

My sources confirm that the purchaser is who folks suspected. The family name, when added to the word 'Cracker', is a favorite sweet treat used with S'mores.

The estate of Reverend Billy Graham?

Hallelujah!!!
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,475
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
I see no issue with the statement, but also see your point. The whole receiver thing is weird. It sounds like he has a better and higher offer which his job.

What a bizarre saga from the get go...
Yup, the job of the receiver is ultimately to get the most $$ back to the original investors, as possible. Even if that may ultimately mean that whoever the receiver eventually agrees to a deal with, may not be the "best" person/group to oversee the next era of operating Burke. Hopefully it will end up with that person/group, actually being the "best" for the next phase of Burke operations, but that isn't a given
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,476
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Yup, the job of the receiver is ultimately to get the most $$ back to the original investors, as possible. Even if that may ultimately mean that whoever the receiver eventually agrees to a deal with, may not be the "best" person/group to oversee the next era of operating Burke. Hopefully it will end up with that person/group, actually being the "best" for the next phase of Burke operations, but that isn't a given
The highest bidder is not a stranger to Burke and has previously brokered two sales and even owned it as a silent partner.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,476
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
I am listening to the presentation. I am not impressed. The main speaker, Tood Firestone, is just rambling. Some observations, so far.

1. He admitted that they did lower their offer because of the delays in the process. He is trying to justify this as being normal. I call B.S.
2. He did not offer any specific ideas and instead just offered general ideas and thoughts.
3. His partner, from this Wisconsin Resorts, commented that Burke is "similar" to Searchmont (it is not).
4. He wants to lower the base of the Mid-Burke HSQ to the level of the hotel.
5. The first question he was asked about selling the hotel rooms as condos and people were not happy about it. He then went on to basically say he is going to sell them.
6. They are asking the public to demand a public auction of the area.
7. Todd claims that he and his partners manufacture fan guns. He is saying that they can do it for $8-10,000 per gun and is relying on this for the mountain.
8. The first question was by the guy who had started the petition a few weeks ago. His was disappointed that this presentation provided no specifics.
9. Todd is openly questioning the Receiver.
10. A second person pushed back on the sale of the hotel rooms as condos. Todd just is ignoring that feedback.
11. A person pushed back on the access issues when BMA is training.
12. Todd admitted that he had not skied in Vermont in five years due to IKON/Epic and crowds.
13. He claimed that Burke only has "two blue runs" and it needs more. Someone did not do their homework. :rolleyes:
14. Many people expressed discomfort that this group does not have adequate capital. The response was, "trust me, we have the capital".
15. One partner said they plan on $20 million investment in 3-4 years "depending on the reaction" to their improvements.
16. The question was asked about how many units would be converted to condos. They said "84-116 units", or the entire hotel.
17. Someone said that the most important thing that needs to remain is the Bear Den Lounge :LOL:
18. They disclosed that the average occupancy rate is 40%. They are not giving up on this idea to condominimize the Hotel.
19. Todd said that the mountain is a "distressed asset" and that they would of course consider increasing their bid.
20. Mark said that there was an offer of $12 million that did not move forward. He also took some shots at the Receiver.

Overall, I am not impressed at all by this group. I stand by my assessment that this seems shady. The intent tonight was to get everyone excited for their bid and try to convince the Receiver to sell to them. People were less than enthusiastic. It’s also clear to me that their real intent is to buy the Hotel for a steep discount and to resell all the units as condos for a huge profit. That’s their only plan.
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: Edd

AdironRider

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
3,676
Points
83
Firestone seems to completely miss that a hostile takeover is not the right way to start off owning the largest business in a small community.
 
Top