Stephen we got to get over this Clinton sex thing that happen a decade ago. Anyway were talking about GWB not Clinton.Stephen said:7) It' sex. S-E-X. Oral SEX. The problem with morality in this nation is that we can't call it what it is. You have to say "Whatever" because to call it SEX would mean your war hero Clinton actually LIED under oath. Perjury is a serious crime in this nation. In a nation of laws, perjury is the one thing that can destroy it utterly. Try it sometime... I doubt you'll get off as easily. (Pun intended).
-Stephen
Getting back to GWB, the following does not surprise me given GWB's record number of executions while Govenor of Texas.
GWB's interrogation techniques might, one day, reveal interesting information about al-Qaida. To do that GWB is in violation of the Geneva Convention Article 17 rules that captives are obliged to give only their name, rank, number and date of birth. No "coercion may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever". In the hope of breaking them, however, the authorities have confined them to solitary cells and subjected them to what is now known as "torture lite": sleep deprivation and constant exposure to bright light. Unsurprisingly, several of the prisoners have sought to kill themselves, by smashing their heads against the walls or trying to slash their wrists with plastic cutlery.
GWB administration argues that Al Qaeda members don't qualify because they don't have these qualifications: (1) being under a responsible command; (2) having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance; (3) carrying arms openly; and (4) conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war. At times they have included the qualification of wearing a military uniform. Back last February, Bush said the Taliban and Al Qaeda were enemy combatants. After a lot of heat, he revised his position to recognize that Taliban soldiers were entitled to POW protections but not Al Qaeda. I think they call this a FLIP FLOP. This Administration has been making up the rules as it goes along and refuses to concede that enemy combatants are entitled to judicial review of its decision.
"Article 5 of the Third Geneva Convention states that if there is "any doubt" as to whether captured combatants should be recognized as POWs, "such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal." In other words, if doubt exists, the status of each detainee must be determined individually, not by a blanket decision of the President."
"Even if not technically prisoners of war, al Qaeda and Taliban captives still qualify for "humane treatment" under the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment, a resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1988."