kbroderick
Active member
Re: Olympic coverage.
Well, a lot of folks in the US have three choices with regard to Olympic coverage:
1. Get the results online and not be able to actually watch the competitions
2. Watch the tape-delayed competitions and pretend that they're live. Or at least not tape-delayed by quite as long as they are.
3. Watch the Eurosport webcast online
Option 2 requires steadfast avoidance of any mention of results prior to the airing of the event, and it's in NBC's best interest to encourage that option, so they'd be pretty stupid to drop results in ahead of the actual broadcast. Quite frankly, I'd rather have good live coverage that I could either watch or tape (so I'd be tape-delaying it at my discretion rather than NBC's). Since I'm stuck with a limited selection of US-based TV channels and I don't have my computer hooked up to a TV, I'm taking option 2. There is also a logistics aspect to it--by doing as much of the work as possible prior to the event, as if doing it live, they'd be able to do it during daytime rather than later at night.
So as annoyed as I am by NBC's coverage, covering events as if they haven't happened yet is not amongst my gripes.
kickglide said:The network coverage amuses me as it is rather schmaltzy and bogus. It was already common knowledge that the Men's Downhill was won by a Frenchman and the American contenders were only also rans. Why can't they include that in their opening remarks instead of pumping the losers? They have the whole day to change the report.
Well, a lot of folks in the US have three choices with regard to Olympic coverage:
1. Get the results online and not be able to actually watch the competitions
2. Watch the tape-delayed competitions and pretend that they're live. Or at least not tape-delayed by quite as long as they are.
3. Watch the Eurosport webcast online
Option 2 requires steadfast avoidance of any mention of results prior to the airing of the event, and it's in NBC's best interest to encourage that option, so they'd be pretty stupid to drop results in ahead of the actual broadcast. Quite frankly, I'd rather have good live coverage that I could either watch or tape (so I'd be tape-delaying it at my discretion rather than NBC's). Since I'm stuck with a limited selection of US-based TV channels and I don't have my computer hooked up to a TV, I'm taking option 2. There is also a logistics aspect to it--by doing as much of the work as possible prior to the event, as if doing it live, they'd be able to do it during daytime rather than later at night.
So as annoyed as I am by NBC's coverage, covering events as if they haven't happened yet is not amongst my gripes.