Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Very cool! I wonder how that thing is gonna stand up to high winds though. It looks like 82 little sails running up the lift.
I was thinking the same thing.
Also, winter tends not be too sunny. And who's going to have the job of constantly clearing the snow off them.
It's going to take decades of energy savings to pay off that $1.6m. Chances are the slope will be closed before they come close to seeing the savings.
It's going to take decades of energy savings to pay off that $1.6m. Chances are the slope will be closed before they come close to seeing the savings.
True enough, but from a design and engineering standpoint, it's damn cool.Solar has a long way to go before it makes sense from a financial standpoint.
x2 Solar has a long way to go before it makes sense from a financial standpoint.
From the article: So what happens to the 82 solar "wings" when it dumps? Not a problem, because they rotate to follow the path of the sun in the sky and can be tilted to perpendicular during a storm, so there's no load and the snow slides right off.
Hard to say but it looks like more than savings. It's also a profit source. From the article: It's more than solar-powered, in fact -- it's a smart investment. The Tenna lift generates 90,000 kilowatt hours a year, or three times the juice needed to run the lift, and the extra power goes back into the grid, which makes money for the town, which can pay residents back.
I'm reporting you to Mr. Fuller Wycliff. Can he please step in?
Did you read the article?90,000 kwh is nothing. Maybe enough to run 10 average homes for a year. A ski resort has to use well over 400,000 kwh, could be wrong, but I can't imagine it being much less. So even if they knock that down by 90,000 a year, they still have a considerable amount left, plus the mortgage on their solar system. A 30 year loan on 1.5 million would be $50,000 a year before any interest. It would take a long time for them to see any benefit from it. Wind power is the way to go. They generate millions of kwh.
If anyone can learn anything from the Swiss, it's their business shrudness!
Solar HAD a long way to go when they came on the market a few year back. We're already half of that long way now.Solar has it's place, but it has a long way to go.
It's going to take decades of energy savings to pay off that $1.6m. Chances are the slope will be closed before they come close to seeing the savings.