RootDKJ
New member
Here's an interesting projection as to where the currents might take the oil.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Note to readers: I apologize in advance for the length of this post. I also want to lead off by saying it's completely not aimed at any individual, in particular WakeboardMom. She just happened to have a reasonable post that reminds me just how unreasonable many people can be. The following is not intended to be political. I fully realize that to the engineers among us, the sequence of events is a gross oversimplification. The nitty gritty isn't that important for our purposes. I also realize that I cannot type "the" or "and" accurately regularly.
As I understand it, it's absolutely not a case of this or that alarm not going off. It was an exploration well that they drilled, to see if there were hydrocarbons present. There are, hooray, so you plug the hole up, seal it up tight, and call in a development drilling rig (the one that sank drills 1 hole fast, then moves on. A development rig sits there, drills 5-10 holes, gets the wells hooked up to the pipeline, then moves on. Rinse, repeat). The hole had been cemented, as I understand it, with a plug (think a wine cork) topped by cement, topped by another plug, with a Blow Out Preventer (BOP) on top of that. On top of all that was the riser, which is the pipe that runs from the seabed up through 5,000 feet of water to the platform, typically filled with mud. Imagine how much 5,000 feet of mud in a 12-14 inch pipe weighs- yet another safety check holding the gas and down. Somehow the pressure down in the hole jumped beyond what the plugs and cement could hold (faulty design, a bad pour, a bad read on the pressure, or the engineers weren't familiar with an average Tuesday morning for Marc, it's hard to say), and hydrocarbons worked their way into the riser and up to the platform. Now, the first plug should have held, but it didn't. The cement should have held, but it didn't. The second plug should have held, but it didn't. The BOP should have slammed shut (huge pointy rams jam closed, pinching off the pipe and closing it), but it didn't. The mud in the riser should have held everything down, but it didn't. So, hydrocarbons made it to the platform, and found an ignition source, which, as anyone who's been at Marc's on a Tuesday morning will tell you, it always does. So, boom.
So, what went wrong? Was there mud in the riser, and was it the right mud? Maybe, but they may have been clearing the riser preparing to disconnect. Were the plugs put in wrong? Maybe, but the cement job around the casing (you drill the hole, then put a piece of casing pipe in, then pour cement around that) might have failed, letting everything seep up past the plugs. Did the BOP fail? Maybe- it might not have activated at all, or maybe a plug got jammed back up into it preventing it from closing.
In the end, until it's contained and re-drilled, it's all a guessing game. Maybe it was the crew, maybe it was the cement, maybe it was the BOP, maybe it was the casing, maybe it was some dumbshit bad luck.
The efforts to contain and control the damage have been quite amazing. BP's reaction has actually been great- they stood right up and said "We'll pay for it." I'm sure they'll be going after folks, too, but no cattle egrets are dying waiting for that check to clear.
It's a disaster, sure. It's a shame those 11 crew members lost their lives, absolutely. Could it have been prevented? Maybe, tighter regs, better control, who knows, maybe it could have. The thing is, it's the risk we run. We need the oil and the gas. We want the power and the plastics. We crave all things petroleum. Pure and simple. If you drive a car to your favorite environmental protest wearing your animal friendly plastic Crocs eating your heart healthy tofu imported from China where they know the value of a hard day's work, then step on up and roll the dice at the Deepwater Casino.
There aren't that many choices. Drive, and either destroy the Gulf or fund terrorists, or don't. Or, drive less, spend more to do it, and pay for an alternative. Whatever, don't go lambasting the evil oil executives who are intentionally trying to destroy the environment.Throw a little of that blame around, splash a little on the NIMBYs and BANANAs. Give a cup to SoccerMom, and a jigger to...okay, I don't have a male equivalent to SoccerMom. Because the engineers will figure out a way to keep this from happening again, just like they'll figure out a way to keep the next bad thing from happening again, and the next bad thing after that. And some day, we'll decide the price is too high. Whether it's at the gas pump, or at the grocery store, or at the tarmac wasteland that used to be a beach. And then, maybe, just maybe, we'll do something useful about it.
I thought I read that the drilling mud was in place only sea water. I do not remember where I saw this. This could expalin the the plugs failing.
Yeah, apparently they were pulling the mud and replacing it with seawater, a normal step prior to disconnection. Issue seems to be that the cement wasn't good, and couldn't hold wihtout the mud on top. BP's looking worse and worse in all of it, as it seems they did whatever they could to cut a day or two off the time the rig was on site. Not, in and of itself, a bad thing, but therer are some corners that shouldn't be cut.
C-10 well done
You have analytically described in layman's terms that the complexity and ultimate repair of the failure is akin to peeling back the layers of the problem like an onion until SOMETHING works .
Many of us do not comprehend the whys and wherefores of various design elements for control systems that are /were in place and continue to fail and as a result grow weary of the seemingly stultifying pace of problem resolution --------------Not saying i agree with that but right or wrong that's HUMAN Nature and expecting systemic behavioral modification relative to lifestyle choices within a society that is self centered is a Pipedream ( No Pun intended )
Thanks again for 'splainin it to us rubes
Yup, good explanation to say the least by c-ten!
I think the "best" way I've heard in an attempt to explain now why capping this sucker is so tough (aside from being about a mile below the surface) is from a mechanical engineering prof they were interviewing on TV who described it in the following way (paraphrasing here) - it's easy to screw a sprayer onto the end of a garden hose when the water isn't flowing through the hose, now try and do the same thing when the water is flowing though the hose - much tougher, and now have that hose be 14" in diameter![]()
Yup, good explanation to say the least by c-ten!
I think the "best" way I've heard in an attempt to explain now why capping this sucker is so tough (aside from being about a mile below the surface) is from a mechanical engineering prof they were interviewing on TV who described it in the following way (paraphrasing here) - it's easy to screw a sprayer onto the end of a garden hose when the water isn't flowing through the hose, now try and do the same thing when the water is flowing though the hose - much tougher, and now have that hose be 14" in diameter![]()
BP's looking worse and worse in all of it, as it seems they did whatever they could to cut a day or two off the time the rig was on site. Not, in and of itself, a bad thing, but therer are some corners that shouldn't be cut.
That's a pretty good article. Not sure I entirely agree with BP's definition of "not uncommon," but that's neither her nor there.
Main reason for cutting corners: $533,000 a day for the rig to be on station.
I think they might review the risk v. reward analysis on that decision.
Everyone is really dumping on BP lately. I have to ask the question: why BP? Does any one really think any other energy company could have done a better job with this? I find that hard to believe. If people want to be outraged, they should look in the mirror first. Then.... well, then it gets political so I will leave it at that.