• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Toggenburg Purchase Deemed to Violate New York Antitrust Law

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,457
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Some of you might have seen that a New York State judge determined that Intermountain's purchase of competing Toggenburg Ski Area, before shutting it down to maintain marketshare of the company's two competing ski areas, violated state anti-trust law. It is not clear what will happen, but Intermountain could face stiff fines and might have to resell the ski area.

 

urungus

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
2,251
Points
113
Location
Western Mass
Some of you might have seen that a New York State judge determined that Intermountain's purchase of competing Toggenburg Ski Area, before shutting it down to maintain marketshare of the company's two competing ski areas, violated state anti-trust law. It is not clear what will happen, but Intermountain could face stiff fines and might have to resell the ski area.

If only this had happened to the owners of Jiminy Peak when they purchased and then shut down Brodie
 

2Planker

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
1,691
Points
113
Location
MWV, NH
Some of you might have seen that a New York State judge determined that Intermountain's purchase of competing Toggenburg Ski Area, before shutting it down to maintain marketshare of the company's two competing ski areas, violated state anti-trust law. It is not clear what will happen, but Intermountain could face stiff fines and might have to resell the ski area.

Same thing happened to Les in '96, the early days of ASC.
They were forced to sell Waterville after acquiring both Attitash and Cranmore
 
Top