• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Undersea Cables

ctenidae

Active member
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
8,959
Points
38
Location
SW Connecticut
10 terabits per second- hell, anybody could get anything done with that kind of speed. Run an Empire on a 4-channel telgraph, then get back to me...

ATMap2S.jpg
 

Glenn

Active member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
7,691
Points
38
Location
CT & VT
I know we'll always need the ol' inteweb "backbone". But I wonder if we'll see a day where the wireless signal is as fast as a wired connection. Imagine not needing a wired connection at home. Just a small router that picks up a 4G(or faster) signal and all the devices in your house are internet connected.
 

TheBEast

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
1,574
Points
0
Location
Too far south, MA
Some issues with some of the cables in Japan after the earth quake and I was reading somewhere about some dredge fishing boats off Korea/China that were causing havoc on the underwater cables. Would certainly be a neat documentary to see how those are laid out and maintained.
 

Geoff

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
5,100
Points
48
Location
South Dartmouth, Ma
I know we'll always need the ol' inteweb "backbone". But I wonder if we'll see a day where the wireless signal is as fast as a wired connection. Imagine not needing a wired connection at home. Just a small router that picks up a 4G(or faster) signal and all the devices in your house are internet connected.

No. There isn't enough wireless spectrum to ever go faster wireless than what is possible going wired. To get to where we are now with wireless, (LTE, WiMAX, and 802.11n WiFi using QAM modulation), we're running multiple channels in parallel.

"Fast" costs money when you're running over licensed radio spectrum since somebody has to pay the billions for the license & radio infrastructure and you have to share it with all the other users sharing your antenna. To reduce the number of users sharing a single antenna, you bunch the antennas much closer together and reduce the power so they don't interfere with each other. That makes the radio network really expensive.

With COAX or fiber, you can deliver 100 gigabit/sec if you want to. That would never be possible with wireless.
 
Top