• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Warren Miller in new movie. And they get SUED!?

tcharron

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
2,222
Points
0
Location
Derry, NH
The more I read about this, the sicker I get.

They're suing them because they claim trademark of Warren Millers *VOICE* in the film.
 

bvibert

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
30,394
Points
38
Location
Torrington, CT
Wow, that sounds pretty messed up. Certainly not inspiring me to run out and see or buy the next Warren Miller flick..
 

tcharron

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
2,222
Points
0
Location
Derry, NH
Wow, that sounds pretty messed up. Certainly not inspiring me to run out and see or buy the next Warren Miller flick..

Warren Miller Entertainment no longer has *ANY* member of the Warren Miller family associated with them. The judge basically threw out their temporary restraining order and let the movie continue to be shown. But the lawsuits still there. But was involved in this movie as an individual, not as Warren Miller trying to compete with Warren Miller Entertainment. And they don't DARE sue him.
 

riverc0il

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
13,039
Points
0
Location
Ashland, NH
Website
www.thesnowway.com
Wow, that sounds pretty messed up. Certainly not inspiring me to run out and see or buy the next Warren Miller flick..
I have been saying this for years. The folks that run WME have had nothing to do with Warren Miller for a long time. This shows that not only does WME and Warren Miller have nothing to do with each other, but that WME is hostile to Warren Miller continuing his work in film. I am sure Warren Miller got paid handsomely when he sold out and left his own company, but this sort of thing has to turn his stomach for sure. It certainly does mine.

Big thumbs down.
 

tcharron

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
2,222
Points
0
Location
Derry, NH
I have been saying this for years. The folks that run WME have had nothing to do with Warren Miller for a long time. This shows that not only does WME and Warren Miller have nothing to do with each other, but that WME is hostile to Warren Miller continuing his work in film. I am sure Warren Miller got paid handsomely when he sold out and left his own company, but this sort of thing has to turn his stomach for sure. It certainly does mine.

Big thumbs down.

And then there's Warren turning around and starting a new foundation on how to start ethical companies. :-D
 

tcharron

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
2,222
Points
0
Location
Derry, NH
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jamie-starr/warren-miller-is-my-frien_b_298572.html

seems like WME doesnt aprove of what Warren Miller has been up to....

Yes, dup post. :-D

http://forums.alpinezone.com/63700-warren-miller-new-movie-they-get-sued.html

What I can't get is how they POSSIBLY think they have a leg. Warrens name isn't on the box. It isn't even mentioned ANYWHERE. If anything, they look like complete idiots. I personally have decided I'm not going to their movie this year over it, and basically provided that feedback alongside the billion other people complaining on their facebook page.
 

snowmonster

New member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
4,066
Points
0
Location
In my mind, northern New England
Another reason to skip on the WME offerings. Lots of other companies out there to get your ski movie fix (TGR's "Session," Matchstick's "In Deep," etc.) that offer a superior experience IMHO. Plus, this year, we have Edge of Never and Swift Silent Deep. That's a loaded pre-winter movie season even without WME!
 

Glenn

Active member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
7,692
Points
38
Location
CT & VT
It's like Carol Shelby vs. The Cobra Club of America all over a gain.
 

tcharron

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
2,222
Points
0
Location
Derry, NH

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
I'd actually be interested to hear a legal opinion on this. Like it or not, much of the IP value for WME is based on the history of films done by Miller, and his voice is strongly tied to that IP. A movie from Johnny Mosley Entertainment wouldn't get the same caliber talent, same number of premiers, freebies, or DVD sales as from WME, at least not off the bat. That's part of what Warren sold when he stepped away.

If I get a patent with my current company, and then switch companies, the new company doesn't get access to that patent. Miller's name and trademark voice are valuable to WME; if he starts doing voice work for any film company that wants to hire him, that diminishes the value of the IP that Miller sold off with WME.

Bad PR move, but quite possibly legit from a legal standpoint.
 

tcharron

New member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
2,222
Points
0
Location
Derry, NH
I'd actually be interested to hear a legal opinion on this. Like it or not, much of the IP value for WME is based on the history of films done by Miller, and his voice is strongly tied to that IP. A movie from Johnny Mosley Entertainment wouldn't get the same caliber talent, same number of premiers, freebies, or DVD sales as from WME, at least not off the bat. That's part of what Warren sold when he stepped away.

If I get a patent with my current company, and then switch companies, the new company doesn't get access to that patent. Miller's name and trademark voice are valuable to WME; if he starts doing voice work for any film company that wants to hire him, that diminishes the value of the IP that Miller sold off with WME.

Bad PR move, but quite possibly legit from a legal standpoint.

You cannot patent a human. Trademark's, on the other hand. But based on that logic, Warren could never TALK again.

I believe this will get thrown out, and potentially be REALLY bad for WME. For one, based on the fact that they had a non-compete agreement, which has expired, provides evidence that it was understood they expected him to potentially appear in a competitors product. But since that agreement was put in place, there was a reasonable expectation that he may compete with them.

For two, Warren Miller Entertainment cannot use their trademark on the 'Look, Feel, and Sound' when it infringes on Warrens personal rights. Namely, his voice. His 'quips' could be considered part of the look and feel, but he does has a certain right to speech.

Additionally, they can't go after Warren Miller for using his name, or anyone quoting his name. Until lord voldemort tries to take over the wizarding world, you can't force people to refer to him as 'He who shall not be named', and they cannot claim trademark infringement against him.
 

Hawkshot99

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
4,489
Points
36
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
I'd actually be interested to hear a legal opinion on this. Like it or not, much of the IP value for WME is based on the history of films done by Miller, and his voice is strongly tied to that IP. A movie from Johnny Mosley Entertainment wouldn't get the same caliber talent, same number of premiers, freebies, or DVD sales as from WME, at least not off the bat. That's part of what Warren sold when he stepped away.

If I get a patent with my current company, and then switch companies, the new company doesn't get access to that patent. Miller's name and trademark voice are valuable to WME; if he starts doing voice work for any film company that wants to hire him, that diminishes the value of the IP that Miller sold off with WME.

Bad PR move, but quite possibly legit from a legal standpoint.

The government can not prevent a person from working. Skiing is what Miller does for work, so he can not be prevented from doing that. Is there a specific patent on his voice? If there is then they can prevent him from talking in the film such as narrating. Miller also is allowed to use his name as he pleases.

I am not a lawyer, but this is the information I have gathered from talking to the owners of other lawn mowing companies that have employees. They make a employee sign a non-compete contract, but they are basically non enforceable.
 

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
You cannot patent a human. Trademark's, on the other hand. But based on that logic, Warren could never TALK again.
No, Warren just can't lend his vocal talents to ski porn. Ski documentary (a la Steep, discussing the history of ski film making or something,) would probably be ok. But not ski porn. But Level 1 is using Miller's voice to connect their film to the history of WME, and derive profit from WME's previous films to the detriment of WME. That's where the trademark comes in. "In the United States, the test for whether a sound can serve as a trademark 'depends on [the] aural perception of the listener which may be as fleeting as the sound itself unless, of course, the sound is so inherently different or distinctive that it attaches to the subliminal mind of the listener to be awakened when heard and to be associated with the source or event with which it struck'." Also, "It should be noted that trademark rights generally arise out of the use or to maintain exclusive rights over that sign in relation to certain products or services." In my book, Miller's voice when applied to ski porn passes these tests.
 
Top