• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Western trip...where to go?

RISkier

Active member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
1,062
Points
38
Location
Rhode Island
Any thoughts on the best place out west to plan for well in advance? I'm leaning towards Utah for next February but am open to suggestions.

Also, are any areas out west less or more intermediate-friendly?

We’ve been to UT 3 times, recently returned from Vail but otherwise have no direct experience with other CO resorts and we’ve not been anywhere in CA. Some thoughts:

The SLC airport is pretty easy to negotiate. Seems easy to get in and out of and the car rental companies are (or at least were 3 years ago) right at the airport. It’s less than an hour drive from the airport to Alta, Snowbird, Solitude, Brighton, or Park City. Roads to the Cottonwoods Canyons areas can be closed or access might be restricted to AWD in some weather conditions. Roads to PC are expressway and don’t go through any passes. It would take a horrible storm to close the roads to PC. It’s about 1.5 hours or so to Powder Mountain and Snowbasin. The Denver airport is quite a ways from downtown and is much larger. You need to take a train from most of the terminals to the pick up luggage and access transportation. You’ll need a shuttle to pick up a rental, etc. The drive to Summit Co is probably a little over 1.5 hours but you do go up to 11k and go through the Eisenhower Tunnel. Going further West you’d also go over Vail pass. You definitely need to allow more time to get to and through DIA than SLC airport. You have lots of lodging options in UT. You can stay down in Sandy or Midvale near the entrances to BCC and LCC, or you can stay in the Park City area, or, on one of our trips we stayed up in Eden. You can probably find the most cost effective lodging down in the suburbs of SLC; everything from inexpensive hotels to condos. You’re also sleeping at a lot lower elevation. The potential negative is you’re basically staying in a suburb with strip malls, car dealerships, etc. Doesn’t feel like a ski resort. The villages at Solitude, Alta, and Snowbird are pretty small with little off slope activity. I’d happily stay at Alta 2-3 nights, not sure I’d want to stay up there for a week. Eden was extremely quiet. Downtown Park City is lively and you feel like you’re in a ski village. As for the skiing Alta is our favorite. It has good intermediate terrain off of every lift, there’s some steeper groomed terrain, it’s wide open and you have lots of opportunity to veer off groomed terrain into areas of bumps and powder without getting in over your head. Great views and terrain for all abilities. We only spent one day at Solitude but really liked it. Lots of blue and dark blue terrain and generally quiet slopes. I’ve only skied at Snowbird 1 day and I’m not sure I can give it a fair review; it was snowing hard and very windy with poor visibility. Rode up the long chair, went through the tunnel, exited into Mineral Basin, and absolutely couldn’t see the tips of my skis. On a day when I could have seen some of the stuff I was skiing I think I would have enjoyed it but better for strong and adventurous intermediates and above. The Canyons is large and spread out over a bunch of peaks, there’s a lot of interesting terrain for intermediates but it takes time to learn to get around efficiently. DV is also a great place for intermediates. We’ve not skied PCMR but given it’s location I’d assume there would be lots of intermediate terrain there as well. While the skiing is good in PC if you go to UT you have to spend time in the Cottonwoods Canyons. I think you’d also love Powder Mountain and Snowbasin if they have good snow. PM is very retro with mostly slow lifts. But no liftlines and the slopes are virtually empty. Lots of intermediate level off-piste opportunities. Snowbasin has a very upscale feel but without any snobbery. Lots of good intermediate skiing at Snowbasin too, IMO. I think most of the resorts in CO are better developed as resort villages. We really liked skiing at Vail, the terrain is vast and the back bowls have to be seen to be believed but the village is more like a ski metropolis with an interstate running through it. We’re going to try staying in Frisco this March and I think that’s more our kind of town. One other issue to consider is that in CO you’d likely be staying at higher altitude, the base at Vail is a bit over 8k and I could really feel the effects of altitude the first night, Frisco is about 9k, Breck and Copper 9.5k+. Park city is around 7K and if you stay down in SLC you’d be sleeping at even lower altitudes. Base at Alta is around 8.5k.
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,995
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
Any thoughts on the best place out west to plan for well in advance? I'm leaning towards Utah for next February but am open to suggestions.

Also, are any areas out west less or more intermediate-friendly?
Not been to Montana. But of CO, UT and Tahoe, that's the order of difficulty (from less to more). Consensus being, Colorado (Summit County) are most intermediates friendly!

Not that there's no easy terrain in Tahoe or extreme terrain in CO. But the percentage of terrain stack up is obvious. As an upper intermediate who can hack my way down terrain over my head, I cruise around much of Summit County resort of Colorado without a care. But would be a bit more cautious in some of Utah's mountain, and MUCH MORE careful in some of Tahoe's mountain (notably Squaw, Heavenly and Kirwood).
 

dbking

New member
Joined
Jan 13, 2009
Messages
97
Points
0
Location
Big Sky, Montana
If you want to see some great photos of Big Sky check out the thread on TGR. I had nothing to do with them but they ARE good.
It is hard to predict who will have powder that far in advance but in March you can bet that a lot of the mountains South of Montana will be pretty firm if they don't get snow. The altitude and latitude keep the snow soft here in Montana. We are having a below average snow season yet the skiing is pretty good.
But if I was on a "guy's trip" I would go to Tahoe. I used to live there and you can have fun there even if it doesn't snow.
 

snoseek

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
6,635
Points
113
Location
NH
Not been to Montana. But of CO, UT and Tahoe, that's the order of difficulty (from less to more). Consensus being, Colorado (Summit County) are most intermediates friendly!

Not that there's no easy terrain in Tahoe or extreme terrain in CO. But the percentage of terrain stack up is obvious. As an upper intermediate who can hack my way down terrain over my head, I cruise around much of Summit County resort of Colorado without a care. But would be a bit more cautious in some of Utah's mountain, and MUCH MORE careful in some of Tahoe's mountain (notably Squaw, Heavenly and Kirwood).

I would agree with this about Summit County but the San Juans are a completely different story. The terrain to the south is every bit as "extreme" as anywhere I've been. As a vacationer flying in from the east I don't think I would even bother with Summit County or Vail unless It's about the resort experience. I'm sure it would almost always be Utah but this is a great year to be able to ski Taos,T-Ride, Silverton with a decnt snowpack.
 

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
I would agree with this about Summit County but the San Juans are a completely different story. The terrain to the south is every bit as "extreme" as anywhere I've been. As a vacationer flying in from the east I don't think I would even bother with Summit County or Vail unless It's about the resort experience. I'm sure it would almost always be Utah but this is a great year to be able to ski Taos,T-Ride, Silverton with a decnt snowpack.
T-Ride...How is it for a West virgin? Not looking for anything crazy my first time out, but some interesting terrain would be good. Some day I'd like to hit places like Squaw, Jackson, or Revelstoke, but I figure I'll work my way up.

Unfortunately, not gonna make it this year, but hopefully next.
 

abc

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
5,995
Points
113
Location
Lower Hudson Valley
I would agree with this about Summit County but the San Juans are a completely different story. The terrain to the south is every bit as "extreme" as anywhere I've been. As a vacationer flying in from the east I don't think I would even bother with Summit County or Vail unless It's about the resort experience. I'm sure it would almost always be Utah but this is a great year to be able to ski Taos,T-Ride, Silverton with a decnt snowpack.
The poster was SPECIFICALLY asking for "intermediate friendly" destination!

Not everyone wants the most extreme terrain.
 

snoseek

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
6,635
Points
113
Location
NH
The poster was SPECIFICALLY asking for "intermediate friendly" destination!

Not everyone wants the most extreme terrain.

Dude the terrain for intermediates is perfect. It just happens to have some crazy terrain as well.
 

Talisman

New member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
673
Points
0
Location
New England, ayup
Mammoth & Tahoe have great conditions right now. Wednesday morning another 5 inches of snow and the breeze yesterday moved the powder around to fill in the troughs of the bumps at Mammoth.

Next week is supposed to be a big warm up. As some one else said Tahoe is eithe great snow or great weather. Heavenly is an intermediate paradise as long as you stay out of the trees, Mott Canyon and Killibrew Canyon.
 
Top