• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Lift Line Etiquette

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
27,984
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
No, it's definitely 50%. Pretty much everyone I've skied with on this board (which is dozens of people) or really anyone throughout my skiing lifetime approaches a liftline on a busy day and makes a judgment call. Do we wait an extra 5-10 minutes in line and ride together or go up separately and meet at the top and not wait in line so long. It comes down to how important it is to you to ride the lift with your skiing partners.

"True singles" don't have a monopoly on shorter lift lines. They pay the same price as everyone else to ski.

And how exactly would you expect a mountain to enforce your standards? "Hey you two! Don't think I didn't see you talking to each other! You're fraudulent singles. Get out of the singles line and to the back of the regular lines!" That kind of policy enforcement would go over like a loud fart in church.
 

farlep99

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
266
Points
18
Location
VT
If 50% of people who got into a singles line did this, I'm pretty sure mountains would either do-away with singles lines, or (*gasp*) actually start to enforce it on crowded days like they should.

I'm not exactly sure what you would want enforced? Here's a scenario: I'm skiing with 1 other friend. We ski down to a double chair that has a decent size line, but also has a roped off singles line with only 6-7 people in it. We decide to ski into the singles line & take the chance of not riding up together. That's wrong in your view? You only get the benefit of a shorter lift line if you're skiing alone? How would preventing this be enforced? Someone complains, "hey those 2 are friends!" & we are not eligible for single line status? I've seen some weird opinions on here, but this may be tops. It's definitely August...
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,185
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
And how exactly would you expect a mountain to enforce your standards? "Hey you two! Don't think I didn't see you talking to each other! You're fraudulent singles. Get out of the singles line and to the back of the regular lines!"

Pretty much. It's a rule. I have seen signs before with language that notes something to the effect of, "The Singles line is for singles only", and/or to please respect this etc...

So I don't see this as being any different as any other rule you choose to enforce. In fact, the somewhat recent disappearance of singles lines might be for the reason you suggest, that the mountain may not want to get involved and/or have to babysit people.
 

Scruffy

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,157
Points
38
Location
In the shadow of the moon.
News flash, the mountain ops does not care if the singles line consists of 100% lonely hearts clubs members, or if the singles line fills with the two or three buds types, who get into it one behind the other. If run correctly, they use the singles line to fill in seats, because we all know, the non-singles line will not manage itself - sure some people merge to form a quad/six/whatever, but most do not care and only want to ride with their peeps, empty seats or not.

Yeah sure, lift ops sometimes will load up a couple of chairs only from the singles line if they see it getting too long. And, yes, some lift ops are better than others at managing the line, but I've observed the crashing the singles line technique both work and not work, in terms of getting up the lift faster. I think it's a wash on whole.
 

Scruffy

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,157
Points
38
Location
In the shadow of the moon.
In fact, the somewhat recent disappearance of singles lines might be for the reason you suggest, that the mountain may not want to get involved and/or have to babysit people.

Where are you see that? I've seen just the opposite on busy weekends, two singles lines when normally there are one.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,185
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
I've seen some weird opinions on here, but this may be tops.

I think it's a weirder opinion to genuinely believe that the real reason most people do not get into the 4 minute singles line, but rather get into the 17 minute regular line, is NOT because they think it's rude, but rather because they desperately wish to ride the chair with the person(s) they came with, and if that means having to wait an extra 13 minutes multiple times per day, well..... then so be it!
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
27,984
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I have not seen the "disappearance of the singles line" anywhere I've skied recently. I'd like to hear an example where because that mountain will have a lot of seats without asses in them. I'm with Scruffy. The heard won't manage itself.
 

MEtoVTSkier

Active member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
1,234
Points
38
Location
Aroostook County, ME
How about this, do away with the singles line, EVERYBODY forms up in order and waits the same initial amount of time and tries to form groups of full chairs before they get to the head of the line, if for some reason a chair isn't full, you have to step aside at the loading area, until another non full chairload gets to the head of the line, and then pull people from the "non-full chair" group to top off the empty slots in the order that they ended up in the group. This will ensure that people try to group in full chairloads as quickly as possible to keep things moving and get to the top quicker. Removes the benefit of trying to use the singles line to beat the crowd, and everyone equally has to wait the at least the same initial amount of time to get to the head of the line.

Of course, the "it's all about me" crowd isn't gonna like this...

Those willing to quickly form full groups shouldn't be penalized by those using the singles line to beat the pack.
 

yeggous

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
2,170
Points
36
Location
Eagle, CO
Why aren't we talking about pizza?

Because these guys spend too much time skiing southern Vermont. I refuse to go near the place because of the rage that their lift lines create.


Sent from my iPad using AlpineZone mobile app
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,185
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
How about this, do away with the singles line, EVERYBODY forms up in order and waits the same initial amount of time and tries to form groups of full chairs before they get to the head of the line, if for some reason a chair isn't full, you have to step aside at the loading area, until another non full chairload gets to the head of the line, and then pull people from the "non-full chair" group to top off the empty slots in the order that they ended up in the group. This will ensure that people try to group in full chairloads as quickly as possible to keep things moving and get to the top quicker. Removes the benefit of trying to use the singles line to beat the crowd, and everyone equally has to wait the at least the same initial amount of time to get to the head of the line.

Of course, the "it's all about me" crowd isn't gonna like this...

Those willing to quickly form full groups shouldn't be penalized by those using the singles line to beat the pack.

I've seen something like this before, but it wasn't skiing, but at a theme park I believe. There were spots (circles) on the floor for 1s, 2s, 3s, and 4s, and you were loaded that way.

Where are you see that?

It seems to me that there was always a singles line present. I mean always, even if it was an empty midweek Wednesday and it wasnt used. Now it seems often there's no singles line, or perhaps it comes and goes at their discretion. But I feel I hear the lift operators yelling "single?" a lot more now and just doing it that way (which frankly seems to work fine), than having a dedicated singles line.
 

Smellytele

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
9,953
Points
113
Location
Right where I want to be
How about on a quad have 4 singles lines and nothing else. each chair would be full of 4 people if there are only 4 singles lines. same for doubles and triples.
 

MadMadWorld

Active member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
4,082
Points
38
Location
Leominster, MA
How about on a quad have 4 singles lines and nothing else. each chair would be full of 4 people if there are only 4 singles lines. same for doubles and triples.

The Madonna I line could get very interesting that way. On bad weekends, folks are already forced to lineup on an incline.
 

farlep99

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
266
Points
18
Location
VT
I think it's a weirder opinion to genuinely believe that the real reason most people do not get into the 4 minute singles line, but rather get into the 17 minute regular line, is NOT because they think it's rude, but rather because they desperately wish to ride the chair with the person(s) they came with, and if that means having to wait an extra 13 minutes multiple times per day, well..... then so be it!
I can't follow this reply at all. I just think there's nothing "rude" about getting into the singles line even if I happen to be skiing with someone I know as long as we're not trying to crowbar our way on to the same chair or something obnoxious like that. And I'm sure 95% of others on here agree.
 

moresnow

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
477
Points
16
How about on a quad have 4 singles lines and nothing else. each chair would be full of 4 people if there are only 4 singles lines. same for doubles and triples.

Not a terrible idea. It would fill every seat. There is nothing worse than empty seats going up on a busy day.
 
Top