• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Hunter News!!

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,887
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Curious if this is already part of the 6 pack financing or for future use. A 6 pack costs more than 4.8 million
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,646
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
Curious if this is already part of the 6 pack financing or for future use. A 6 pack costs more than 4.8 million

That's likely close to the cost of the 6 pack - I know that the $ figure that Mount Snow is tossing around for their 6 pack and high speed quad upgrades for next summer is 10 million. Sure the installs are going to be a bit different, but most base to summit high speed chairs these days are running in the 4 to 6 million range
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,887
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Pretty sure Killington's Skye Peak HSQ was 6 mil. I would assume a 6 pack would run a bit more due to more expensive chairs and most likely the engine needed to haul the added weight. Of course the Skye Peak lift might be much longer. Never been to Hunter.
 

skiadikt

Active member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
1,081
Points
38
Pretty sure Killington's Skye Peak HSQ was 6 mil. I would assume a 6 pack would run a bit more due to more expensive chairs and most likely the engine needed to haul the added weight. Of course the Skye Peak lift might be much longer. Never been to Hunter.

actually think the hunter chair is a little longer.
 

millerm277

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
1,828
Points
48
Location
NH
actually think the hunter chair is a little longer.

Probably about the same in vertical rise, but the skye peak quad is probably a bit longer. (However, I'd think Hunter would be more technically challenging with all the cliffs and varying pitch of the climb.

Anyway, it sounds good, should definitely help them with the expansion. :grin:
 

RichT

Active member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
804
Points
43
Location
N Haledon, NJ/Jewett, NY/South Seaside Park, NJ
Hunter used quite a few of the original pads from the old quad, they have at least half of the towers up and haven't used the helicopter yet. Makes me think it's going to cost them alot less, then 4.8m. That's why it states "move a lift and install a new one"??
 

threecy

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
1,930
Points
0
Website
www.franklinsites.com
Assuming the article is right, they were awarded a loan guarantee. The amount would secure what they'd be borrowing from a private institution - in other words, it would give a bank (or the lift manufacture) reason to loan a large amount of money while minimizing risk.

I highly doubt they're executing this project with $0 down, thus the guarantee may be on the loaned amount, not the total contract value.
 

millerm277

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
1,828
Points
48
Location
NH
The loan amount makes sense to me. They've got a lot of projects related to this happening/going to happen soon. Tearing down the Quad and the Y-lift, and putting the Quad back in where the Y was (with new towers and such), installing the 6-Pack, building a new snowmaking reservoir on the West Side, and I'd assume installation/upgrades of the snowmaking on the West Side.
 

Highway Star

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
2,921
Points
36
Pretty sure Killington's Skye Peak HSQ was 6 mil. I would assume a 6 pack would run a bit more due to more expensive chairs and most likely the engine needed to haul the added weight. Of course the Skye Peak lift might be much longer. Never been to Hunter.

That was the claimed cost including "trail improvements", which was major blasting and grading for 2 new sections of Great Eastern, plus the stash park. $5.1M was the claimed figure for the lift - but I think that's inflated quite a bit, since they re-used the towers....
 

dmc

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
14,275
Points
0
The loan amount makes sense to me. They've got a lot of projects related to this happening/going to happen soon. Tearing down the Quad and the Y-lift, and putting the Quad back in where the Y was (with new towers and such), installing the 6-Pack, building a new snowmaking reservoir on the West Side, and I'd assume installation/upgrades of the snowmaking on the West Side.


FREE THE X TRAIL!!!! :) Plant trees on 44... Maybe dig out a Fiddle style rock band.. haha.
 
Top