• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

are killington skiers more passionate about skiing or just a bunch of whiners?

2knees

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,330
Points
0
Location
Safe
lots of good opinions on this. i, for one, am really upset about bear being closed and have voiced my opinion to management. if the season were longer, i would ski longer. that seems to be the opinion of everyone i speak to at killington.
but when i talk to people that ski sugarbush (my brother has had a house there for 20 years) they are fine with the season length and that mt ellen closes early. same thing with the people i talk to at stowe.
i just find it interesting that the killington skiers react differently than at other mtns... maybe it is just the fact that we got used to a long season and now that the place is being run as a money making business, we just cant accept it. and all the people that want to ski until there is no more snow are pass holders
just an observation... not trying to offend anyone

I think you've basically answered your own question.

You're a bunch of bitches....:razz:

In all seriousness, as previously stated by others, i think its simply a fact of k having had a long standing tradition of staying open until there basically wasnt a single patch of snow left worth skiing. Interestingly, this hasnt really happened since before ASC split but as powbmps said, we're all getting old and the memory of the past haunts our present and future. Sugarbush, Jay and Stowe never really were playa's in the late game until recently. Others have tried at times to fill the void but the fact killington closes with such good cover only reinforces the belief that they can still do what they used to do.
 

AMBR

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
27
Points
0
Location
The Jersey Shore
maybe it is just the fact that we got used to a long season and now that the place is being run as a money making business, we just cant accept it. and all the people that want to ski until there is no more snow are pass holders
just an observation... not trying to offend anyone
I'm sure most of the people that ski late are pass holders, but for the record, most of the people in my club and the other Jersey clubs nearby get discount tickets from the NJ Ski Council, but most of us don't have passes. Don't know how many people that is, but it's quite a few, though probably not enough to make a difference.
 

andyzee

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
10,884
Points
0
Location
Home
Website
www.nsmountainsports.com
I'm sure most of the people that ski late are pass holders, but for the record, most of the people in my club and the other Jersey clubs nearby get discount tickets from the NJ Ski Council, but most of us don't have passes. Don't know how many people that is, but it's quite a few, though probably not enough to make a difference.

On the flip side, pass holders buy passes to Killington with expectation of longer season. Season gets shorter, so do the list of reasons to buy Killington pass. Season gets longer, so does list of reasons to buy Killington pass. This year a blackout pass to Killington is going for $720, a blackout pass for Whiteface/Gore is going for $565. Between me and my wife, that's a $310 difference. For me drive time distance is the same. They both have pluses and minuses, but this is something to consider with shorter season. If on the other hand, I get classic Killington May skiing, it's a no brainer for me.
 

roark

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
2,384
Points
0
Location
Seattle WA
^^ exactly why I don't even consider a K pass anymore. The only reason (for me) was early and (especially) late. Much rather be somewhere else mid-season. K has so many little nooks with different aspects so you can find nice corn all day as the sun passes.
 

Riverskier

Active member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
1,105
Points
38
Location
New Gloucester, ME
On the flip side, pass holders buy passes to Killington with expectation of longer season. Season gets shorter, so do the list of reasons to buy Killington pass. Season gets longer, so does list of reasons to buy Killington pass. This year a blackout pass to Killington is going for $720, a blackout pass for Whiteface/Gore is going for $565. Between me and my wife, that's a $310 difference. For me drive time distance is the same. They both have pluses and minuses, but this is something to consider with shorter season. If on the other hand, I get classic Killington May skiing, it's a no brainer for me.

This is an important point. With Boyne's October to May season they virtually have me locked in as a customer. Shorten the season and I would at least consider other options, such as Saddleback's unrestricted season pass for less than Boyne's blackout pass.
 

mediamogul

New member
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
201
Points
0
Location
Noho
lots of good opinions on this. i, for one, am really upset about bear being closed and have voiced my opinion to management. if the season were longer, i would ski longer. that seems to be the opinion of everyone i speak to at killington.
but when i talk to people that ski sugarbush (my brother has had a house there for 20 years) they are fine with the season length and that mt ellen closes early. same thing with the people i talk to at stowe.
i just find it interesting that the killington skiers react differently than at other mtns... maybe it is just the fact that we got used to a long season and now that the place is being run as a money making business, we just cant accept it. and all the people that want to ski until there is no more snow are pass holders
just an observation... not trying to offend anyone

IDK I bet the Sugarbush skiers would be pissed if they watched Castlerock close with wall to wall coverage and 100% open. The difference is that Sugarbush is in the hands of dedicated skiers more interested in preserving the experience of the mountain than attracting droves of tourists.
 

shadyjay

Active member
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Messages
257
Points
28
Website
linktr.ee
We can operate Castlerock at Sugarbush on weekdays with a staff of (roughly) 5 - that's 3 lift operators and 2 ski patrollers. It is fully connected to the rest of the Sugarbush trail network and utilizes the same base area, access lifts, etc.....

If Killington decided to keep Bear Mtn open longer, then they would have to staff 2 lifts (figure at least 5 people for that, give or take), plus patrol. And since Bear Mtn is a designated entry point into the resort, you'd also probably want to staff it with ticket agents, and some limited food/beverage service. Essentially you have to staff an additional base area, each with their own lifts and lodges. At this point in the season, its not economical, especially during the weekday period.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,727
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
This is a forum (place for discussion).

captain_obvious_RE_Evolution-s241x323-54668.jpg


And as to this comment, you completely missed the mark.

You find something wrong with this?



:lol:
 

mediamogul

New member
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
201
Points
0
Location
Noho
We can operate Castlerock at Sugarbush on weekdays with a staff of (roughly) 5 - that's 3 lift operators and 2 ski patrollers. It is fully connected to the rest of the Sugarbush trail network and utilizes the same base area, access lifts, etc.....

If Killington decided to keep Bear Mtn open longer, then they would have to staff 2 lifts (figure at least 5 people for that, give or take), plus patrol. And since Bear Mtn is a designated entry point into the resort, you'd also probably want to staff it with ticket agents, and some limited food/beverage service. Essentially you have to staff an additional base area, each with their own lifts and lodges. At this point in the season, its not economical, especially during the weekday period.

Just run the SPQ and staff the ticket window. Minimal staff and amenities. Noone said open the lodge, just open the parking lot. Also we at K lost Bear, the Needle's Eye area and South Ridge. That is a solid chunk of our mountain and many of those other lifts have no base area. So I believe it is comparable. Either way people at the Bush would be upset if Castlerock closed with 100% open and wall to wall.
 

frankm938

New member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
324
Points
0
Just run the SPQ and staff the ticket window. Minimal staff and amenities. Noone said open the lodge, just open the parking lot. Also we at K lost Bear, the Needle's Eye area and South Ridge. That is a solid chunk of our mountain and many of those other lifts have no base area. So I believe it is comparable. Either way people at the Bush would be upset if Castlerock closed with 100% open and wall to wall.

nobody seems upset about mt ellen closing with great coverage (i think that is more comparable to bear closing than castlerock)
 

SkiFanE

New member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
1,260
Points
0
Location
New England
Agreed, also, early/late skiing is something that has seperated Killington from other mountains for many years. Hate to see that disappear.

Exactly. I've been on skis for 40 years (impossible for a 39yo, eh? lol) and the latest I've ever skied was Killington on May 14th in the mid 90s, still have the lift ticket. Can't remember the lodge, the trail or details, except there was one little ribbon of snow left to connect 2 big trails. What a day...festive sunny deck, beers flowing. THAT was Killington back then, if you didn't want the season to end, you went to K.

BTW - Sunday River is 100% open (or 99.9..see Lollipop is closed).
 

mediamogul

New member
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
201
Points
0
Location
Noho
nobody seems upset about mt ellen closing with great coverage (i think that is more comparable to bear closing than castlerock)

Wouldn't that be more comparable to Pico closing? Pico closed with 100% and nobody at K is terribly up in arms.

Both Bear and Castlerock are on the main mountain which is why they are comparable at least on that front. I acknowledge that they are different in that Bear has a lodge Castlerock does not. Comparable, not identical.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,727
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
We can operate Castlerock at Sugarbush on weekdays with a staff of (roughly) 5 - that's 3 lift operators and 2 ski patrollers. It is fully connected to the rest of the Sugarbush trail network and utilizes the same base area, access lifts, etc.....

If Killington decided to keep Bear Mtn open longer, then they would have to staff 2 lifts (figure at least 5 people for that, give or take), plus patrol. And since Bear Mtn is a designated entry point into the resort, you'd also probably want to staff it with ticket agents, and some limited food/beverage service. Essentially you have to staff an additional base area, each with their own lifts and lodges. At this point in the season, its not economical, especially during the weekday period.

And IIRC Killington has run Bear without the Lodge services before (just bathrooms) and it seemed to work OK.
 

mlkrgr

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
460
Points
18
I think K is a mighty fine mountain. Sure, SR and SL beat them when put together on number of days open in a season, but I guess that's just me because I'm usually too busy to even bother to ski this time of year (and November into early December too for that matter). The lift lines can be managed a bit better at K (singles join the regular line too late to ensure it moves along well) and I think the Snowdon quad wouldn't be a bad idea to replace to spread some traffic out from the gondola. As for someone who just wants to make the most out of the 7-8 days a year I go (and I let other people pick the mountain in exchange for not having much of a driving hassle most times), I feel I get the most from my money at K (assuming equal pricing) as I can go inside the gondola if I'm cold and to eat lunch. I like having that easy cruise one or two times a day to Skyeship base to have that 12 minute gondola ride.

Though, the bus company I like the most didn't go to K this year; they didn't do so because they didn't get a good enough deal on group tix from them, which is why I had plenty of days to pick from to go to SR or Loon this year. Almost went to Stowe this year, but chose Mt Snow over that for a significantly lower price.
 

skiadikt

Active member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
1,081
Points
38
I think you've basically answered your own question.

You're a bunch of bitches....:razz:

In all seriousness, as previously stated by others, i think its simply a fact of k having had a long standing tradition of staying open until there basically wasnt a single patch of snow left worth skiing. Interestingly, this hasnt really happened since before ASC split but as powbmps said, we're all getting old and the memory of the past haunts our present and future. Sugarbush, Jay and Stowe never really were playa's in the late game until recently. Others have tried at times to fill the void but the fact killington closes with such good cover only reinforces the belief that they can still do what they used to do.

nicely said ... regarding the mt ellen/bear mt thing. not really the same. at bear all you'd have to do is run one stinking lift - even the bear chair. keep the lodge & lot closed. firing up the grill & selling refreshments would be optional but certainly profitable. if you did have food service, then you'd have to open the rest rooms but costs would have been minimal. mt ellen isn't really connected to lincoln in the same way and a lot more more expensive to open.
 
Top