marcski
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2005
- Messages
- 4,576
- Points
- 36
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52907844-78/avalanche-pierre-resort-hoyal.html.csp
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
that sucks for his family.
It's a little bit ironic though. With Pierre there was never a question of "if" he would die skiing just "when". He seemed almost hell-bent on killing himself with his big drops. But this accident didn't fit that profile. He was snowboarding (not his main tool) and was caught in a slide rather than intentionally plummeting hundreds of feet. Although it sounds like it was an ill advised choice to be there given the avy conditions.
I think we do already know. It is why avi deaths keep happening. Skiers and riders think they know what they are doing. No one skis a line thinking "this is probably going to kill me" but rather "this aspect is different than that other aspect, I am confident it won't go". I gotta wonder if Avalanche instruction needs to focus even more on decision making and less on the science? I don't know. It is why I don't pursue avalanche terrain... I know I couldn't trust myself to be unbiased after hiking 3k vert to ski pow.Wonder why he didn't turn around and head for a safer lower angle route down. Guess we'll never know.
It's somewhat ironic that Pierre jumped off a 255 ft cliff in 2006 and survived only to be killed skiing fairly conservativel.
We interviewed the victim's ski partner. While neither had any rescue gear or formal avalanche training...
You would think a guy with his experience would have more common sense than to ski gullies that are at a high risk to slide.
The article stated he and his buddy likely triggered another slide before the slide that killed him. Wonder why he didn't turn around and head for a safer lower angle route down. Guess we'll never know.
RIP
definitely a great skier
I think we do already know. It is why avi deaths keep happening. Skiers and riders think they know what they are doing. No one skis a line thinking "this is probably going to kill me" but rather "this aspect is different than that other aspect, I am confident it won't go". I gotta wonder if Avalanche instruction needs to focus even more on decision making and less on the science? I don't know. It is why I don't pursue avalanche terrain... I know I couldn't trust myself to be unbiased after hiking 3k vert to ski pow.
You know it was not a matter of easy vs hard terrain. The snow was just too unstable everywhere yesterday.
Yea, totally. That is the really weird that they didn't heed what nature was telling them. Perhaps lack of avi training was part of the reason. Though I could easily see someone well versed in avi training thinking they were just on the wrong aspect when something went and that another aspect might be better. Just bad decisions all around even in the face of overwhelming evidence that something was wrong.I would've figured had Jaime set off one already, that he'd call it a day. That would've been my decision anyhow.